VS

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Nissan Qashqai comparison

Compare performance (71 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (11,600 £ vs 29,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Space Star or Nissan Qashqai?

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Nissan Qashqai: Key differences

Mitsubishi Space Star

3.8 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Space Star

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mitsubishi Space Star is substantially cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,957 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Qashqai uses 4.3 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Mitsubishi Space Star with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.

Qashqai

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai offers substantially more power – delivering 205 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 134 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Qashqai is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 6.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Qashqai delivers clearly more torque with 330 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 228 Nm more.

Space Star

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is clearly lighter – 940 kg compared to 1,420 kg. The difference is around 480 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers clearly more boot space – 504 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 269 L.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Qashqai carries noticeably more – 516 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 116 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan Qashqai holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £29,600
Qashqai

Nissan Qashqai

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 158 - 205 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Captur
VS
The Nissan Qashqai stays the sensible family favourite — roomier, better built and more composed on the motorway, so it’s the pick if you value comfort and practicality without drama. The Renault Captur, meanwhile, charms with bolder styling, clever packaging and nippier city manners (usually for …
Mitsubishi Space Star
Nissan Qashqai

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details
DSC_2683_low
DSC_6272_low
DSC_8755_low
050_low

Reviews Mitsubishi Space Star

3.8 (1 Reviews)
rate
Bernard
19 May 2026, 19:43:01

Mitsubishi is more reliable brand, also the mirage /space star is more Fuel efficient than dacia Sandero

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Nissan Qashqai

The Nissan Qashqai is a compact crossover that blends everyday practicality with a comfortable, composed driving experience and a smart, well finished interior. It feels sensible and versatile for city life and longer trips, appealing to buyers who want a reliable, low fuss family car.

details
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_005
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_001
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_011
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_032
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_022

Reviews Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Nissan Qashqai
Opel Grandland
VS
The Nissan Qashqai feels sharper on the road with refined handling and clever packaging, while the Opel Grandland answers with a roomier cabin and bolder looks that’ll please practical families. Pick the Qashqai for polished tech and a composed daily drive, choose the Grandland if you want more …
MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Symbioz
VS
Comparing the Nissan Qashqai with the Renault Symbioz highlights a clash between a proven compact crossover and Renault's forward-looking Symbioz concept that showcases the brand's electric and connected ambitions. This comparison will focus on how they differ in design, practicality and technology …
BYD Seal U
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The BYD Seal U storms in as a slick, electric fastback that outpoints the Qashqai on pace, tech and running costs, while the Nissan Qashqai stays sensible with higher ride height, roomy practicality and a pedigree for reliability. If you crave EV performance and futuristic cabin kit — and can live …
Nissan Qashqai
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Qashqai and Opel Mokka are two popular compact SUVs that take very different approaches: the Qashqai focuses on roomy practicality and comfortable family motoring, while the Mokka favours bold styling and nimble city driving. Below I'll outline the key differences in space, driving feel, …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Austral
VS
Pick the Nissan Qashqai if you want a composed, easy-to-live-with compact SUV that feels refined and sensible on running costs; choose the Renault Austral if you crave a roomier, more stylish cabin with sharper tech and hybrid efficiency. Both have their charms — Qashqai is the safe, comfortable …
Nissan Qashqai
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Nissan Qashqai feels like the classier, more refined compact crossover—crisper handling, a plush interior and sharper infotainment—while the Toyota Corolla Cross is the sensible rival, offering rock-solid reliability, excellent economy and no-nonsense practicality that will age well. If you …
Mitsubishi Space Star
Nissan Qashqai

Costs and Consumption
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Price
29,600 - 39,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
112 - 125 g/km
co2
98 - 152 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,624 kg
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
Length
3,845 mm
Length
-
Width
1,665 mm
Width
1,835 mm
Height
1,505 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
359 - 400 kg
Payload
446 - 516 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
71 HP
Power HP
158 - 205 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
102 Nm
Torque
260 - 330 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
52 kW
Power kW
116 - 151 kW
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Nissan
What drivetrain options does the Mitsubishi Space Star have?

The Mitsubishi Space Star is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.