VS

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Skoda Kamiq comparison

Compare performance (71 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (11,600 £ vs 22,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Space Star or Skoda Kamiq?

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Skoda Kamiq: Key differences

Mitsubishi Space Star

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • barely more efficient
  • markedly lighter
details

Skoda Kamiq

4.9 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Space Star

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mitsubishi Space Star is clearly cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Skoda Kamiq costs 22,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,620 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Space Star uses 4.9 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.

Kamiq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kamiq offers considerably more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 79 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kamiq is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kamiq delivers significantly more torque with 250 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 148 Nm more.

Space Star

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is markedly lighter – 940 kg compared to 1,231 kg. The difference is around 291 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kamiq offers substantially more boot space – 400 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 165 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kamiq carries markedly more – 539 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 139 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kamiq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,300
Kamiq

Skoda Kamiq

  • Engine Type Petrol
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 95 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
Mitsubishi Space Star
Skoda Kamiq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details

Skoda Kamiq

The Skoda Kamiq is a practical, well-built small crossover that mixes city-friendly manners with surprisingly versatile interior space and clever storage solutions. It offers a comfortable ride, user-friendly technology and solid value, making it a sensible choice for everyday driving.

details
Mitsubishi Space Star
Skoda Kamiq

Costs and Consumption

Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Price
22,300 - 32,700 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
112 - 125 g/km
co2
121 - 128 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Trunk capacity
400 L
Length
3,845 mm
Length
-
Width
1,665 mm
Width
1,793 mm
Height
1,505 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
359 - 400 kg
Payload
439 - 539 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
71 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
102 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
52 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General

Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.