VS

Nissan Juke vs Polestar 4 comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 544 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 53,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Juke or Polestar 4?

Nissan Juke vs Polestar 4: Key differences

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • significantly lighter
details

Polestar 4

4.8 (13 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Juke

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Nissan Juke is significantly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Polestar 4 costs 53,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 31,672 £.

4

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Polestar 4 offers clearly more power – delivering 544 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 401 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Polestar 4 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 6.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Polestar 4 delivers clearly more torque with 686 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 486 Nm more.

Juke

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is significantly lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 2,230 kg. The difference is around 956 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Polestar 4 offers somewhat more boot space – 526 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 104 L.

When it comes to payload, the Polestar 4 carries very slightly more – 455 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 28 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Polestar 4 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £53,100
4

Polestar 4

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 272 - 544 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.8 - 19 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 590 - 620 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Polestar 4
Volvo EX60
VS
Polestar 4 and Volvo EX60 go head-to-head in a clash of Scandinavian design, tech and electric muscle — one is a sporty provocateur, the other a polished family flagship. Time to find out which brings the sharper drive, smarter cabin and better real-world value for buyers who want style with …
Polestar 2
Polestar 4
VS
Polestar 2 is the compact, drivers‑first EV — nimble, practical and hard‑working for daily commutes — while the Polestar 4 ups the ante with coupe‑SUV looks, more interior space and a higher‑spec feel that commands a premium. If you want sharp handling and better value, choose the 2; if you crave …
Nissan Juke
Polestar 4

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7)
Exterieur statisch (2)
Exterieur statisch (12)
Interieur (25)

Reviews Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

Polestar 4

The Polestar 4 wears a coupe-like profile and a Scandinavian-minimal interior that feels premium and unexpectedly roomy, with composed handling that makes urban driving and country roads a pleasure. For buyers who want an electric car that turns heads without shouting, the Polestar 4 is a stylish, clever choice that balances practicality with personality.

details
7458E184-FE1C-49CD-8688-8D9AD87DD167
3ACA6B65-1C98-412F-9D32-588E078B6285
3634B075-6672-406F-B1C3-46F68F4A8DD7

Reviews Polestar 4

4.8 (13 Reviews)
rate
BigB
27 Jun 2026, 07:17:13

Awesome car, the quietest in its class, lightning-fast and of very high quality, good promotions in June 2026

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Didier
6 Jun 2026, 19:04:29

Beautiful car with exceptional comfort. Tesla is still the more affordable car, but if I'm going to drive, I'd go with Polestar without hesitation.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alain Lescadres
2 Jun 2026, 01:50:33

Fantastic car in all ways

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dave
21 May 2026, 08:55:02

Very nice comfort and interior feel. Big wide car with great seating front and rear.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Carlos
21 Jan 2026, 19:23:48

The Polestar 4 has a very attractive design that doesn’t go unnoticed.
The interior is elegant, comfortable and finished with good materials.
Easy to drive, great grip on the tarmac and strong acceleration.
For the price, there are things to improve to be competitive with other brands of equal quality and technology; it needs meaningful upgrades — e.g., better driving ADAS, true autonomous parking and the ability to move the car remotely if you can’t get inside. Improving charging times is essential, and not having a rear window while relying on a camera in the interior mirror shouldn’t be a cause for concern. Otherwise, a spectacular car with a gorgeous design.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Polestar 4
XPeng P7+
VS
The Polestar 4 and XPeng P7+ represent two different approaches to the modern electric car—Polestar 4 leans on Scandinavian design, premium materials and driver-focused dynamics, while the XPeng P7+ emphasizes tech-packed features, range efficiency and value. This comparison will cut through specs …
BYD Seal
Polestar 4
VS
Meet the BYD Seal — a tech-packed, value-driven challenger — and the Polestar 4, the sleek Swedish upstart angling for premium credibility. We pit Seal vs Polestar 4 to find out which one delivers the sharper blend of range, performance and everyday usability, and which should earn a spot in your …
Ford Focus
Nissan Juke
VS
The Ford Focus and the Nissan Juke take very different approaches to the compact segment: the Focus focuses on balanced driving dynamics, practicality and refined handling, while the Juke trades conventional packaging for bold styling, higher ride height and city-friendly presence. Choose the Focus …
Dacia Sandero
Nissan Juke
VS
The Dacia Sandero and Nissan Juke both aim at buyers wanting compact, city-friendly cars, but they take very different approaches: the Sandero focuses on affordability and practical simplicity, while the Juke leans into distinctive styling and a more dynamic feel. This comparison will help you …
Polestar 4
Polestar 5
VS
Polestar 4 and Polestar 5 are sibling EVs with shared design DNA but different missions: the Polestar 4 is a compact coupe‑SUV aimed at style and everyday practicality, while the Polestar 5 is a larger four‑door gran turismo focused on performance, range and long‑distance comfort. This comparison …
Nissan Juke
Renault Clio
VS
Choosing between the Juke and the Clio comes down to whether you want a compact crossover with bold styling and a higher driving position or a polished, practical hatchback focused on everyday usability. If you prioritise standout looks and a more commanding ride go for the Juke; if you want …
BMW iX3
Polestar 4
VS
The BMW iX3 and Polestar 4 are both premium electric SUVs but take very different approaches—BMW favors refined, familiar SUV comfort while Polestar pushes a sportier, design-forward experience. This comparison will focus on range, performance, interior quality and everyday practicality to help you …
Nissan Juke
Polestar 4

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 30,100 £
Price
53,100 - 59,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 19 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
590 - 620 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
105 - 136 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Curb weight
2,230 - 2,355 kg
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Trunk capacity
526 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,800 mm
Width
2,008 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
405 - 427 kg
Payload
455 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Power HP
272 - 544 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 7.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 Nm
Torque
343 - 686 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Power kW
200 - 400 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Polestar
Is the Nissan Juke offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.