Compare performance (143 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 23,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Juke or Suzuki Vitara?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, two formidable contenders stand out: the Nissan Juke and the Suzuki Vitara. For 2024, these vehicles bring their latest innovations, showcasing different strengths while catering to diverse preferences. Let's delve into the technical aspects and innovations that define these models and determine which might suit your needs better.
Both the Nissan Juke and Suzuki Vitara sport bold designs typical of modern SUVs. The Juke measures 4210 mm in length, 1800 mm in width, and 1593 mm in height, giving it a slightly larger stance compared to the Vitara's dimensions of 4185 mm x 1775 mm x 1595 mm. While both offer a comfortable interior with five seats and five doors, Nissan's trunk capacity stands at 422 liters or 354 liters dependent on configuration, edging over the Vitara's 375 liters at maximum.
The Nissan Juke offers versatility with its petrol and full hybrid powertrains. With power outputs ranging from 114 HP to 143 HP and a torque of 200 Nm, it offers a spirited drive with options of manual, dual-clutch automatic, or automatic gearboxes. The Juke's top speeds coordinate between 166 to 180 km/h, coupled with 0-100 km/h acceleration times between 10.1 and 11.8 seconds depending on the configuration.
On the other hand, the Suzuki Vitara is available with a petrol MHEV and full hybrid options, offering slightly higher power outputs of 129 HP or 116 HP with torque reaching 235 Nm. Its top speed spans from 180 to 190 km/h, and it accelerates to 100 km/h in 9.5 to 12.7 seconds. Its dual-drive option, including all-wheel drive, offers added versatility.
Fuel consumption is a critical factor for many drivers, and both models aim to offer competitive efficiency. The Juke's consumption ranges from 4.7 to 6 L/100 km, with CO2 emissions between 107 and 137 g/km. Meanwhile, the Vitara boasts a fuel consumption range of 5 to 5.6 L/100 km and slightly better CO2 emissions, spanning from 113 to 129 g/km, potentially making it a more eco-friendly choice.
Both the Nissan Juke and Suzuki Vitara are equipped with advanced technologies and safety features that cater to the modern driver’s needs. The Juke's full hybrid system is innovative in delivering efficient power distribution, while its array of transmission options offers drivers enhanced control. The Vitara’s all-wheel-drive capability emphasizes adaptability across diverse terrains and conditions, providing peace of mind regardless of road conditions.
Choosing between the Nissan Juke and Suzuki Vitara comes down to personal preference and specific requirements. The Juke offers a slightly more powerful performance and a larger trunk, while the Vitara may attract those seeking better fuel efficiency and potential for off-road handling with its all-wheel drive. Both models, however, align well with the expectations of modern SUV drivers, providing style, functionality, and innovation.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Nissan Juke is a bit cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Suzuki Vitara costs 23,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,186 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Juke uses 4.7 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Suzuki Vitara with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Vitara offers visibly more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 41 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Vitara is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 2.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Suzuki Vitara delivers clearly more torque with 307 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 107 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is very slightly lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 1,274 kg. The difference is around 19 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Nissan Juke offers moderately more boot space – 422 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 47 L.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Juke carries only slightly more – 427 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 2 kg.
The Suzuki Vitara stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.
details
The Vitara is a city-smart SUV with a cheeky streak of off-road promise, perfect for drivers who want practicality without pretense. It’s honest, easy to live with and surprisingly likeable, a sensible companion for everyday adventures and weekend escapes.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,400 - 31,800 £
|
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
105 - 136 g/km
|
co2
0 - 138 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
|
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
|
Trunk capacity
310 - 375 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,185 mm
|
|
Width
1,800 mm
|
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,595 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,120 L
|
|
Payload
405 - 427 kg
|
Payload
395 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 Nm
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España