Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Nissan Juke vs Toyota Aygo – Differences & prices compared
Two cars, one duel: Nissan Juke meets Toyota Aygo.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
Juke
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Toyota Aygo has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 15500 £, while the Nissan Juke costs 21400 £. That’s a price difference of around 5880 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Nissan Juke manages with 4.70 L and is therefore hardly perceptible more efficient than the Toyota Aygo with 4.80 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.
Aygo
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Juke has a significantly edge – offering 143 HP compared to 72 HP. That’s roughly 71 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Juke is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 10.10 s, while the Toyota Aygo takes 15.50 s. That’s about 5.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Nissan Juke performs slightly better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Toyota Aygo tops out at 158 km/h. The difference is around 22 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan Juke pulls clearly stronger with 200 Nm compared to 93 Nm. That’s about 107 Nm difference.
Juke
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Nissan Juke offers to a small extent more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.
In curb weight, Toyota Aygo is noticeable lighter – 1015 kg compared to 1274 kg. The difference is around 259 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Nissan Juke offers clearly more room – 422 L compared to 231 L. That’s a difference of about 191 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Nissan Juke performs distinct better – up to 1305 L, which is about 476 L more than the Toyota Aygo.
When it comes to payload, Nissan Juke to a small extent takes the win – 427 kg compared to 345 kg. That’s a difference of about 82 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Nissan Juke shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £21,400
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Juke
Nissan Juke
The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.
details
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Toyota Aygo
The Aygo is a cheeky city car that turns congested streets into a playground, with bold styling and sprightly manners that make parking a pleasure rather than a pain. Economical to run and surprisingly well equipped for its size, the Aygo is a smart choice for urban buyers who want personality without a premium price and a car that brings a smile to the daily commute.
details
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Nissan Juke
Toyota Aygo
|
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
|
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21400 - 30100 £
|
Price
15500 - 22100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 4.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
107 - 136 g/km
|
co2
108 - 111 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
46 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1274 - 1405 kg
|
Curb weight
1015 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
|
Trunk capacity
231 L
|
|
Length
4210 mm
|
Length
3700 mm
|
|
Width
1800 mm
|
Width
1740 mm
|
|
Height
1593 mm
|
Height
1510 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1237 - 1305 L
|
Max trunk capacity
829 L
|
|
Payload
405 - 427 kg
|
Payload
345 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
|
Power HP
72 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
15.5 - 15.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
166 - 180 km/h
|
Max Speed
151 - 158 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 Nm
|
Torque
93 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
|
Power kW
53 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Toyota
|
What drive types are available for the Nissan Juke?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.