VS

Nissan Qashqai vs Suzuki Vitara comparison

Compare performance (205 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (29,600 £ vs 23,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Qashqai or Suzuki Vitara?

Nissan Qashqai vs Suzuki Vitara: Key differences

Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • markedly more trunk space
details

Suzuki Vitara

4.5 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Qashqai

In the ever-evolving world of compact SUVs, the Nissan Qashqai and Suzuki Vitara have carved out their individual niches. Both vehicles boast a dynamic blend of style, efficiency, and technology, making them strong contenders in the market. In this article, we will explore the technical specifications, innovations, and unique offerings of both models to help potential buyers make an informed decision.

Vitara

Design and Dimensions

The Nissan Qashqai stands at 4425mm in length, 1835mm in width, and 1625mm in height, giving it a robust presence on the road. Weighing between 1420kg and 1665kg, the Qashqai offers a spacious interior designed for comfort and practicality with a trunk capacity of up to 504 liters.

In contrast, the Suzuki Vitara is slightly smaller, measuring 4185mm in length, 1775mm in width, and 1595mm in height. With a curb weight ranging from 1255kg to 1395kg, the Vitara’s lighter construction enhances maneuverability. However, it sacrifices a bit of cargo space with a trunk capacity of 375 liters, which may be a consideration for families or adventurers needing additional storage.

Qashqai

Performance and Engine Options

The Qashqai offers a range of engine options, including petrol mild hybrid and full hybrid variants, with outputs between 140 to 190 horsepower. Notably, it can achieve a fuel consumption as low as 5.1 L/100km, coupled with torque figures ranging from 240 to 330 Nm. The Qashqai also impressively accelerates from 0-100 km/h in as little as 7.9 seconds, depending on the variant chosen. Drivers can choose between manual and automatic transmissions, including a continuously variable transmission (CVT), further enhancing the driving experience.

On the other hand, the Vitara features lower power outputs, peaking at 129 horsepower. It also employs petrol mild hybrid technology, achieving fuel consumption figures as efficient as 5.0 L/100km. The Vitara’s torque output is rated at 235 Nm, and its acceleration times show a wider range, with the quickest variant reaching 100 km/h in 9.5 seconds. Transmission options include manual and automated manual selections, providing adequate versatility for various driving styles.

Vitara

Technology and Features

Both models embrace modern technology, enhancing the driving experience. The Nissan Qashqai is equipped with an advanced driver assistance system that includes features like adaptive cruise control, emergency braking, and lane departure warning, all aimed at increasing safety on the road. Additionally, the Qashqai integrates smart connectivity options such as smartphone mirroring and an intuitive infotainment system.

The Suzuki Vitara also emphasizes safety with features like autonomous emergency braking and a lane-keeping assist system. While it may not have all the bells and whistles of the Qashqai, the Vitara provides a user-friendly infotainment system with connectivity options that cater to today’s tech-savvy drivers.

Qashqai

Environmental Impact

When evaluating the environmental footprint, the Qashqai shines with lower CO2 emissions ranging from 116 g/km to 154 g/km, classifying it within various CO2 efficiency ratings from E to D. This is a substantial aspect for environmentally conscious consumers.

The Suzuki Vitara, while efficient, produces higher emissions at rates between 113 g/km and 129 g/km, placing it within the C to D efficiency classes. Although it presents commendable performance, the Qashqai holds an edge in eco-friendliness.

Vitara

Final Thoughts

Choosing between the Nissan Qashqai and Suzuki Vitara ultimately depends on personal preferences and needs. The Qashqai leans towards a more powerful and feature-rich offering with advanced technology, safety, and efficiency advantages. Meanwhile, the Vitara provides a lightweight and agile alternative, appealing for those seeking reliability and practicality in a compact SUV.

Whether navigating city streets or exploring the great outdoors, both the Nissan Qashqai and Suzuki Vitara present compelling choices for consumers looking to balance performance, efficiency, and innovative technology in a competitive segment. The next step is to test drive both models to discover which one feels right for you!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Qashqai

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Suzuki Vitara is markedly cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,034 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Qashqai uses 4.3 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Suzuki Vitara with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.

Vitara

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai offers a bit more power – delivering 205 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 21 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Vitara is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.6 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Qashqai delivers marginally more torque with 330 Nm compared to 307 Nm. That’s about 23 Nm more.

Qashqai

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is moderately lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 1,420 kg. The difference is around 165 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers markedly more boot space – 504 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 129 L.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Qashqai carries moderately more – 516 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 91 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Suzuki Vitara has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,600
Vitara

Suzuki Vitara

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 110 - 184 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 344 - 426 km
Nissan Qashqai
Suzuki Vitara

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Nissan Qashqai

The Nissan Qashqai is a compact crossover that blends everyday practicality with a comfortable, composed driving experience and a smart, well finished interior. It feels sensible and versatile for city life and longer trips, appealing to buyers who want a reliable, low fuss family car.

details

Suzuki Vitara

The Suzuki Vitara is a practical compact SUV that balances a comfortable, composed ride with easy-to-live-with interior space, making it well suited for daily driving and weekend getaways. It's widely praised for reliable engineering and sensible running costs, offering straightforward value to buyers who want a no-nonsense, economical crossover.

details
Nissan Qashqai
Suzuki Vitara

Costs and Consumption

Price
29,600 - 39,900 £
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
98 - 152 g/km
co2
0 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,624 kg
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
Trunk capacity
310 - 375 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,835 mm
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
446 - 516 kg
Payload
395 - 425 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
158 - 205 HP
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
260 - 330 Nm
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
116 - 151 kW
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Suzuki
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.