Compare performance (205 HP vs 326 HP), boot space and price (29,600 £ vs 28,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Qashqai or VW ID.3?
In a rapidly transforming automotive world, choosing the right car can be both exciting and daunting. Today, we pit the popular Nissan Qashqai against the electron-powered VW ID.3 to uncover their strengths, weaknesses, and what truly sets them apart. Are you ready to embrace modern petrol MHEVs and full hybrids, or does the electric future beckon? Let's dive in.
Both contenders offer distinct visual appeals. The Nissan Qashqai struts with its SUV stance, measuring 4,425 mm in length, 1,835 mm in width, and 1,625 mm in height, exuding a commanding road presence. On the other hand, the VW ID.3 is a hatchback with a more compact form factor, spanning 4,264 mm in length, 1,809 mm in width, and standing 1,564 mm tall. Though smaller, the ID.3's sleek design communicates progressive intentions.
The Qashqai offers a range of petrol engines, available both in mild hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) forms and full hybrids. With power options ranging from 140 to 190 HP, drivers experience 0-100 km/h acceleration times between 7.9 to 10.2 seconds, depending on the variant. The wide variety ensures that potential buyers can select a configuration suiting their daily driving needs.
In contrast, the VW ID.3 is all-in on electric. Available with power outputs ranging from 170 to 326 HP, it doesn’t compromise on performance. Electric acceleration is exemplified by ID.3's ability to race from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 5.7 seconds in its most powerful configuration, demonstrating electric power's impressive torque and responsiveness.
The Qashqai's driving experience caters to varying climates and needs, offering both front-wheel and all-wheel-drive configurations. With a consumption range of 5.1 to 6.8 L/100km, it provides a balance between performance and efficiency. The CO2 emissions sit between 116 to 154 g/km, aligning with current environmental policies, yet not perfectly matching the ID.3’s zero-emission journey.
The ID.3 impresses with its rear-wheel-drive, providing an engaging ride typical of electric vehicles. Its electric consumption hovers around 14.5 to 15.8 kWh/100km, depending on the variant. With an impressive range that maxes out at 604 km, the ID.3 stands as a testament to how far electric technology has come in addressing range anxiety concerns.
Both cars comfortably accommodate five passengers. The Qashqai, being an SUV, offers a larger trunk capacity of up to 504 liters, significantly more than the ID.3's 385 liters. However, what the ID.3 lacks in trunk space, it compensates with a tech-forward interior that might appeal to the tech-savvy driver.
Deciding between the Nissan Qashqai and the VW ID.3 truly boils down to lifestyle preferences and individual needs. The Qashqai is ideal for those who appreciate a robust and versatile vehicle with a diverse powertrain lineup. Meanwhile, the ID.3 represents the next step for those ready to make the leap into the zero-emission, electric future.
As the automotive industry evolves, these two vehicles provide vivid illustrations of what's available today, offering a glimpse into the dynamic and rapidly changing world of modern transportation.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
VW ID.3 is only slightly cheaper – starting at 28,600 £ , while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,037 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the VW ID.3 offers clearly more power – delivering 326 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 121 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW ID.3 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.6 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Nissan Qashqai is marginally faster – reaching 206 km/h, while the VW ID.3 tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 6 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the VW ID.3 delivers clearly more torque with 545 Nm compared to 330 Nm. That’s about 215 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is noticeably lighter – 1,420 kg compared to 1,787 kg. The difference is around 367 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers clearly more boot space – 504 L compared to 385 L. That’s a difference of about 119 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Nissan Qashqai offers a bit more capacity – up to 1,447 L, about 180 L more than the VW ID.3.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Qashqai carries marginally more – 520 kg compared to 473 kg. That’s a difference of about 47 kg.
The VW ID.3 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.
details
The VW ID.3 is a crisply styled electric hatch that masks serious practicality behind a friendly, modern face, making city runs and longer trips pleasantly fuss free. For buyers seeking a sensible, well-equipped EV that doesn't take itself too seriously, the ID.3 strikes a neat balance of comfort, tech and everyday usability with a cheeky smile.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,600 - 39,900 £
|
Price
28,600 - 49,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.5 - 15.8 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
383 - 605 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
52 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
102 - 154 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,665 kg
|
Curb weight
1,787 - 1,993 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
Trunk capacity
385 L
|
|
Length
4,425 mm
|
Length
4,264 mm
|
|
Width
1,835 mm
|
Width
1,809 mm
|
|
Height
1,625 mm
|
Height
1,564 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,422 - 1,447 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,267 L
|
|
Payload
466 - 520 kg
|
Payload
437 - 473 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
|
Power HP
170 - 326 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 8.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 545 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
|
Power kW
125 - 240 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
VW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España