Compare performance (205 HP vs 231 HP), boot space and price (29,600 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Qashqai or VW ID.3?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In a rapidly transforming automotive world, choosing the right car can be both exciting and daunting. Today, we pit the popular Nissan Qashqai against the electron-powered VW ID.3 to uncover their strengths, weaknesses, and what truly sets them apart. Are you ready to embrace modern petrol MHEVs and full hybrids, or does the electric future beckon? Let's dive in.
Both contenders offer distinct visual appeals. The Nissan Qashqai struts with its SUV stance, measuring 4,425 mm in length, 1,835 mm in width, and 1,625 mm in height, exuding a commanding road presence. On the other hand, the VW ID.3 is a hatchback with a more compact form factor, spanning 4,264 mm in length, 1,809 mm in width, and standing 1,564 mm tall. Though smaller, the ID.3's sleek design communicates progressive intentions.
The Qashqai offers a range of petrol engines, available both in mild hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) forms and full hybrids. With power options ranging from 140 to 190 HP, drivers experience 0-100 km/h acceleration times between 7.9 to 10.2 seconds, depending on the variant. The wide variety ensures that potential buyers can select a configuration suiting their daily driving needs.
In contrast, the VW ID.3 is all-in on electric. Available with power outputs ranging from 170 to 326 HP, it doesn’t compromise on performance. Electric acceleration is exemplified by ID.3's ability to race from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 5.7 seconds in its most powerful configuration, demonstrating electric power's impressive torque and responsiveness.
The Qashqai's driving experience caters to varying climates and needs, offering both front-wheel and all-wheel-drive configurations. With a consumption range of 5.1 to 6.8 L/100km, it provides a balance between performance and efficiency. The CO2 emissions sit between 116 to 154 g/km, aligning with current environmental policies, yet not perfectly matching the ID.3’s zero-emission journey.
The ID.3 impresses with its rear-wheel-drive, providing an engaging ride typical of electric vehicles. Its electric consumption hovers around 14.5 to 15.8 kWh/100km, depending on the variant. With an impressive range that maxes out at 604 km, the ID.3 stands as a testament to how far electric technology has come in addressing range anxiety concerns.
Both cars comfortably accommodate five passengers. The Qashqai, being an SUV, offers a larger trunk capacity of up to 504 liters, significantly more than the ID.3's 385 liters. However, what the ID.3 lacks in trunk space, it compensates with a tech-forward interior that might appeal to the tech-savvy driver.
Deciding between the Nissan Qashqai and the VW ID.3 truly boils down to lifestyle preferences and individual needs. The Qashqai is ideal for those who appreciate a robust and versatile vehicle with a diverse powertrain lineup. Meanwhile, the ID.3 represents the next step for those ready to make the leap into the zero-emission, electric future.
As the automotive industry evolves, these two vehicles provide vivid illustrations of what's available today, offering a glimpse into the dynamic and rapidly changing world of modern transportation.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
VW ID.3 is only slightly cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 467 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the VW ID.3 offers a bit more power – delivering 231 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 26 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW ID.3 is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 7.1 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.6 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the VW ID.3 delivers marginally more torque with 350 Nm compared to 330 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is noticeably lighter – 1,420 kg compared to 1,885 kg. The difference is around 465 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers clearly more boot space – 504 L compared to 383 L. That’s a difference of about 121 L.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Qashqai carries somewhat more – 516 kg compared to 464 kg. That’s a difference of about 52 kg.
The VW ID.3 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Nissan Qashqai is a compact crossover that blends everyday practicality with a comfortable, composed driving experience and a smart, well finished interior. It feels sensible and versatile for city life and longer trips, appealing to buyers who want a reliable, low fuss family car.
details
The VW ID.3 is Volkswagen’s compact electric hatch that prioritizes practical daily usability with a comfortable, modern interior. It delivers a smooth, quiet driving experience and intuitive tech that makes switching to electric straightforward.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,600 - 39,900 £
|
Price
29,100 - 40,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.9 - 14.4 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
410 - 629 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
98 - 152 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,624 kg
|
Curb weight
1,885 - 1,966 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
Trunk capacity
383 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,835 mm
|
Width
1,809 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
446 - 516 kg
|
Payload
422 - 464 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
158 - 205 HP
|
Power HP
170 - 231 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.1 - 8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
260 - 330 Nm
|
Torque
350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
116 - 151 kW
|
Power kW
125 - 170 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
VW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España