VS

Nissan X-Trail vs Mazda CX-60 comparison

Compare performance (213 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan X-Trail or Mazda CX-60?

Nissan X-Trail vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences

Nissan X-Trail

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • moderately lighter
  • marginally more trunk space

Mazda CX-60

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

X-Trail

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Nissan X-Trail is noticeably cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,514 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Nissan X-Trail with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.9 L/100km.

CX-60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers visibly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 213 HP. That’s roughly 114 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Nissan X-Trail takes 7 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers marginally more torque with 550 Nm compared to 525 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm more.

X-Trail

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Nissan X-Trail offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan X-Trail is moderately lighter – 1,668 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 222 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Nissan X-Trail offers marginally more boot space – 585 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 15 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries only slightly more – 612 kg compared to 574 kg. That’s a difference of about 38 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-60 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 63 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like the small SUV that went to design school — rear-driven poise, a near-luxury cabin and punchy petrol or PHEV options that reward drivers who crave refinement and involvement. The Toyota RAV4, by contrast, is the stubbornly sensible choice: roomier, more practical, famously …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Nissan X-Trail
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan X-Trail

The Nissan X-Trail is a roomy, no-nonsense family SUV that mixes sensible practicality with a quietly modern look, making it an easy choice for busy lives and weekend escapes. It drives with calm confidence, delivers a comfortable ride and sensible tech, and won’t demand drama while doing the everyday heavy lifting.

details
X-Trail - Dynamic High 22
X-Trail - Dynamic High 14
Nissan_Xtrail_High_043
Nissan_Xtrail_High_033

Reviews Nissan X-Trail

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
Marcin
17 Feb 2026, 12:21:57

I drive an Outback every day; I had an X‑Trail as a courtesy car while mine was in for service. First impression after a few kilometres of driving — the suspension is a disaster. You get the feeling this car picks up every single imperfection in the tarmac. Also, at idle the engine causes noticeably more vibrations in the cabin than the Subaru. On the plus side, a more ergonomic gear lever and 360° cameras. But I wouldn’t swap...

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rafał
6 Feb 2026, 00:23:47

Beautiful, modern design, very good-quality materials, mega acceleration and power. Very modern, loaded with electronics. This is my second Nissan X‑Trail.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Shan Ak
24 Jan 2026, 14:20:58

I have 163 hp platinum premium pack . Car is going very smoothly and comfortable. Also powerful and useful details.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-60 or the Mazda CX-6e is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting …
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a compact luxury tourer — beautifully detailed cabin, taut chassis and an engaging powertrain (there’s even a slick PHEV option) that rewards drivers who care about style and dynamics. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family workhorse: cavernous interior, optional …
Mazda CX-60
Volvo XC60
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Mazda CX-60 and the Volvo XC60, both vehicles offer distinct advantages that cater to different driving preferences. The CX-60 impresses with its dynamic handling and engaging driving experience, while the XC60 shines in terms of luxury and advanced safety …
Nissan X-Trail
VW Tiguan
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Nissan X-Trail and VW Tiguan stand out with their distinct strengths. The X-Trail boasts a spacious interior and versatile cargo space, making it ideal for family adventures, while the Tiguan impresses with its premium interior quality and advanced tech features. …
Ford Kuga
Nissan X-Trail
VS
In the competitive arena of compact SUVs, the Ford Kuga and Nissan X-Trail stand out with their unique offerings. The Kuga impresses with its sleek design and advanced technology features, providing a more dynamic driving experience. Meanwhile, the X-Trail shines in practicality and spaciousness, …
Hyundai Tucson
Nissan X-Trail
VS
Hyundai Tucson arrives with sharper styling, a high-tech cabin and punchy powertrain options — the gadget-forward, sporty choice for buyers who want flair and value. Nissan X‑Trail plays the practical card: roomier, more family-friendly and supremely comfortable on long runs, so pick the Tucson to …
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-60
VS
Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-60 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Nissan X-Trail
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption
Price
34,200 - 50,500 £
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
63 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
131 - 161 g/km
co2
85 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,668 - 1,961 kg
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Trunk capacity
177 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,840 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
432 - 574 kg
Payload
581 - 612 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 213 HP
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 9.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
300 - 525 Nm
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
120 - 157 kW
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Mazda
What drive types are available for the Nissan X-Trail?

The Nissan X-Trail is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.