VS

Omoda 5 vs Skoda Elroq comparison

Compare performance (204 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (31,600 £ vs 32,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Omoda 5 or Skoda Elroq?

Omoda 5 vs Skoda Elroq: Key differences

Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • somewhat lighter
details

Skoda Elroq

4.5 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • noticeably more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

5

Omoda 5 VS Skoda Elroq — quick comparison and who this match-up speaks to

Omoda 5 VS Skoda Elroq sets up a familiar trade-off: a value-packed, feature-heavy newcomer against a quietly mature, spacious compact SUV. The Omoda 5 arrives with generous equipment and a reassuring long warranty that makes the purchase decision feel simple; the Skoda Elroq answers with a calmer, more grown-up package that prioritises space, refinement and everyday usability. If you care most about headline equipment, a strong safety score and low initial cost, the Omoda 5 pulls you in; if you prioritise rear-seat room, highway composure and long-distance calm, the Elroq stands out. Read on to see how those different priorities play out in real-world driving, day-to-day comfort and family practicality.

Elroq

Character and driving feel: playful promise versus composed reserve

The Omoda 5 trades on visual flair and a punchy showroom spec but drives with a softer, less accurate steering and a body that can feel unsettled over rough surfaces. The Skoda Elroq, by contrast, is built around composure: its steering is more assured and the suspension soaks bumps with less follow-up movement, which makes it feel more grown-up on longer runs. Omoda 5’s hybrid option quiets and smooths the powertrain, narrowing the gap on refinement, yet the Elroq still feels fundamentally more stable and confidence-inspiring at speed. For drivers who like directness and a rewarding turn-in, neither is a sporty fireworks display, but the Elroq clearly favours calm control while the Omoda 5 favours conspicuous value and comfort in the front seats.

Comfort and long-distance behaviour: one built for motorway miles, the other optimised for daily polish

On long journeys the Skoda Elroq shows its strengths: low noise, settled ride and rear-seat space that keeps adults comfortable for hours, so fatigue is less of an issue on cross-country trips. The Omoda 5 can be pleasant up front, especially in the hybrid form where engine noise is tamer, but its softer, sometimes waggish body motions and tighter rear packaging make long hauls less relaxed for passengers. Elroq’s suspension and acoustic tuning make cruising less taxing, while Omoda 5 rewards shorter commutes and drivers who value spec and warranty over plush long-distance manners. If most miles are motorway or you regularly carry adults in the back, the Elroq’s package simply reduces stress compared with the Omoda 5.

Practicality and cabin usability: clever, roomy routines versus compact-but-fully-loaded

The Skoda Elroq wins the usability battle in everyday terms: a more generous second row, more flexible boot arrangements and small, clever storage touches that make family life easier. The Omoda 5 counters with lots of kit up front, many cubby holes and a feeling of getting more gadgetry for the money, but it gives up practical height and depth in the load bay and becomes cramped with larger items or three adults in the rear. Both cabins look modern, yet Elroq’s layout feels more mature and intuitive while Omoda 5’s interior prioritises perceived value and technology over outright cargo flexibility. For parents who regularly pack strollers, suitcases or rear-facing seats, the Elroq will be the less frustrating daily companion.

City friendliness, tech and driver aids: helpful abundance versus considered simplicity

The Omoda 5 arrives bristling with driver aids and cameras that make tight manoeuvres easier on paper, but the assistance can be overzealous and infotainment menus are sometimes fussy to use. The Skoda Elroq takes a quieter approach: its systems are generally sensible, the infotainment feels more straightforward and the car’s calm handling and steering make urban driving naturally less taxing. Both cars suffer from restricted rear visibility that pushes drivers toward cameras and assistants, yet in practice the Elroq’s clearer logic and softer controls translate into fewer nagging alerts and a steadier feel at low speeds. If you value lots of tech and a long feature list, the Omoda 5 rewards you; if you want systems that stay out of the way, the Elroq is easier to live with day-to-day.

Buyer fit: who should choose the Omoda 5 and who should lean toward the Skoda Elroq

Choose the Omoda 5 if your priority is maximum kit for your money, a long warranty and a convincing safety score — it appeals to buyers who want to feel well-equipped from the first key turn and value headline features. Opt for the Skoda Elroq if you put a premium on rear-seat space, boot practicality and a composed, low-noise cruising experience that makes long commutes and family trips less wearing. The trade-off is clear: Omoda 5 prizes upfront value and technology, while Skoda Elroq emphasises usable space, refinement and everyday calm. Below this editorial comparison you’ll find the technical details that explain how differences in powertrain, range and load space create these real-world strengths and compromises.

Video - Skoda Elroq

Video Thumbnail
▶

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
Skoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Elroq and the Toyota C‑HR comes down to practicality versus personality in the compact crossover class. The Elroq emphasises roomy, clever packaging and value, while the C‑HR focuses on bold styling and efficient drivetrains—pick the Elroq for everyday versatility or the …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

5

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Omoda 5 is very slightly cheaper – starting at 31,600 £ , while the Skoda Elroq costs 32,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 420 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Elroq is only slightly more efficient: consuming 15.1 kWh/100km compared to 15.9 kWh/100km for the Omoda 5. That’s a difference of about 0.8 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Elroq offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 574 km, about 144 km more than the Omoda 5.

Elroq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Elroq offers markedly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 136 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Elroq is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Omoda 5 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Elroq delivers clearly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 340 Nm. That’s about 339 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Omoda 5 is somewhat lighter – 1,710 kg compared to 2,036 kg. The difference is around 326 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Elroq offers markedly more boot space – 470 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 120 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Elroq carries barely more – 549 kg compared to 536 kg. That’s a difference of about 13 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Elroq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £32,000
Elroq

Skoda Elroq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 441 - 574 km
details
Omoda 5
Skoda Elroq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 is a stylish compact crossover that catches the eye with a bold, contemporary look and a tech-forward cabin. It offers a comfortable ride and a surprisingly spacious interior, making it a practical yet distinctive choice for buyers who want modern features and solid value.

details
IMG_2691

Reviews Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Pablo
8 May 2026, 07:59:00

Fantastic. It would be great to have a bit more battery capacity and a higher DC charging speed.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
maurizio
22 Nov 2025, 17:34:12

Depending on your needs: better for safety, comfort, boot space, trim and performance — downside: higher fuel consumption.

Skoda Elroq

The Skoda Elroq is a practical and well-rounded compact SUV that blends clever packaging with a calm, comfortable ride. It offers a sensible interior, straightforward technology and a value-focused approach, making it a particularly good choice for families and everyday drivers.

details
1_skoda_elroq_166e0554
2_skoda_elroq_b393d405
28_skoda_elroq_3a5d05f5

Reviews Skoda Elroq

4.5 (8 Reviews)
rate
Dirk
16 May 2026, 17:53:06

For me personally, compared directly with the ID4 "GTX", the Elroq is the slightly more mature and better-thought-out car for everyday use. It offers better ride comfort, software that runs a bit more smoothly for me, and by far the nicer design.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Gerry
15 May 2026, 09:17:17

First electric buy, so glad we chose the Elroq. Everything is so intuitive, car very spacious comfortable and nicely appointed, everything just feels right. Turning circle of 9.3M is so useful for such a largish car. Only small gripe is it's has quite a bit of road noise at 100KPH plus, absolutely fine below .

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Caelin
14 May 2026, 14:15:42

EV built for 80 km/h roads; range is very disappointing if you use the highway daily. You won't find this in the specifications. Which means in hindsight it wasn't the right choice.
Comfort fine.
Car catches a lot of wind; a lot of wind noise/whistling.
It's a shame that you have to reset a number of functions every time you start; no automatic memory.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Kay
2 Mar 2026, 11:27:36

We’ve been driving the Elroq 85 Sportline for four weeks. Nice SUV — functional and not overdone. Downside for me: software issues. Infotainment crashed once so far, and the traffic-sign recognition isn’t updating (often shows outdated roadworks).

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
ygfg
16 Feb 2026, 01:00:58

yg

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two …
Volvo EX40
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Volvo EX40 and Skoda Elroq offer contemporary takes on the small SUV segment, but they aim at different buyers — Volvo leans toward premium refinement while Skoda focuses on pragmatic value and space. This comparison will look at driving character, interior practicality, technology and running …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Elroq
VS
Comparing the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Elroq helps you decide between two different approaches to modern motoring. I’ll focus on range, interior space, driving dynamics, technology and ownership costs so you can pick the one that best matches your priorities.
VW ID.3
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the VW ID.3 and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a nimble, hatchback-style EV focused on urban driving or a slightly more spacious, crossover-style model prioritizing practicality. This comparison looks at range, interior space, driving feel and overall value to help …
Omoda 5
BYD Atto 2
VS
The Omoda 5 and BYD Atto 2 are eye-catching compact crossovers that compete on modern styling, tech-packed cabins and strong value for money. This quick comparison will show how they differ in space, equipment, driving character and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your priorities.
Hyundai IONIQ 5
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Hyundai IONIQ 5 and Skoda Elroq offer two distinct takes on the compact electric crossover: the IONIQ 5 shines with bold styling, rapid charging and advanced tech, while the Elroq prioritises practical space, sensible packaging and everyday usability. Your choice will hinge on whether you value …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Elroq
VS
Deciding between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you value Audi’s premium feel and refined driving experience or Skoda’s clever packaging and better value. The Q4 e-tron focuses on high-quality materials, tech and a composed ride, while the Elroq prioritises interior …
Omoda 5
Skoda Elroq

Costs and Consumption
Price
31,600 £
Price
32,000 - 47,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
430 km
Electric Range
441 - 574 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,710 kg
Curb weight
2,036 - 2,255 kg
Trunk capacity
350 L
Trunk capacity
470 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,830 mm
Width
1,884 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
536 kg
Payload
482 - 549 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
340 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Omoda
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the Omoda 5?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.