In a head-to-head comparison between the Peugeot 2008 and the Volvo XC40, the stylish French crossover offers a more dynamic driving experience, appealing to those who prioritize agility and urban maneuverability. Meanwhile, the XC40 stands out with its robust safety features and premium interior, making it a strong contender for buyers seeking luxury and practicality in a compact SUV. Ultimately, the choice between these two models hinges on individual preferences for design, performance, and comfort.
In the ever-expanding realm of compact SUVs, the competition is fierce. Two remarkable contenders are the Peugeot 2008 and the Volvo XC40, each of which brings unique features, distinct engineering, and fresh innovations to the table. This article takes a closer look at how these two vehicles stack up against each other in terms of performance, comfort, and technology.
The Peugeot 2008 boasts a modern and dynamic design, with a length of 4304 mm, a width of 1770 mm, and a height of 1523 mm. Its striking front-end design features sharp LED lights that give it an aggressive stance while ensuring visibility during night driving.
On the other hand, the Volvo XC40 presents a more robust appearance, measuring 4425 mm in length, 1863 mm in width, and towering at 1652 mm in height. The elegant lines and distinctive Volvo grille exude a sense of sophistication, aligning with the brand’s premium image.
When it comes to performance, both vehicles offer a range of engine options. The Peugeot 2008 provides an array of powertrains, including petrol MHEV and electric options, with power outputs ranging from 101 HP to 156 HP. Acceleration is impressive, with the fastest variant achieving 0-100 km/h in just 8.3 seconds. It offers a respectable fuel consumption of 5 to 5.7 L/100km, making it a fuel-efficient choice.
In contrast, the Volvo XC40 comes equipped mainly with MHEV technology, offering power options from 163 HP to 197 HP. Its performance is slightly more robust with a quicker acceleration time of 7.6 seconds for the higher power variant. However, its fuel consumption is higher at around 6.5 L/100km.
Inside, the Peugeot 2008 is designed with a focus on practicality and a user-friendly experience. The spacious cabin provides ample room for up to five passengers and boasts a trunk capacity of 434 liters, making it a suitable option for families or weekend adventures.
The Volvo XC40 takes a luxury approach with high-quality materials and modern design elements, providing a refined atmosphere. With slightly more trunk capacity at 452 liters and generous legroom, the XC40 prioritizes passenger comfort alongside practicality.
Both vehicles showcase advanced technology, but their approaches differ. The Peugeot 2008 is equipped with the latest infotainment system featuring a touchscreen display, Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, and innovative driver assistance features. It integrates modern connectivity options, ensuring that drivers and passengers stay engaged throughout their journeys.
Volvo’s XC40, on the other hand, impresses with its intuitive tech suite, including a high-resolution touchscreen interface and the brand's proprietary safety features. It focuses heavily on driver assistance and safety innovations, giving drivers confidence behind the wheel.
Both the Peugeot 2008 and the Volvo XC40 offer compelling reasons to consider them as your next compact SUV. The Peugeot 2008 excels in efficiency, innovative powertrains, and a stylish design, while the Volvo XC40 brings a premium feel, luxury features, and advanced safety technologies to the forefront.
Your choice will ultimately depend on what you prioritize in a vehicle: efficient performance or premium comfort. Regardless of your selection, both models embody the essence of modern SUV engineering poised to delight drivers in diverse ways.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 23200 - 38200
£
|
Price
about 36400 - 46000
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.7
L
|
Consumption L/100km
6.5
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 - 15.9
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
343 - 406
km
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
46 - 51
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
113, 129, 0
g/km
|
co2
147 - 148
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
44
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1263 - 1623
kg
|
Curb weight
1688
kg
|
Trunk capacity
434
L
|
Trunk capacity
452
L
|
Length
4304
mm
|
Length
4425
mm
|
Width
1770
mm
|
Width
1863
mm
|
Height
1523
mm
|
Height
1652
mm
|
Payload
407 - 447
kg
|
Payload
532
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
101 - 156
HP
|
Power HP
163 - 197
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6
s
|
Max Speed
150 - 206
km/h
|
Max Speed
180
km/h
|
Torque
205 - 270
Nm
|
Torque
265 - 300
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
74 - 115
kW
|
Power kW
120 - 145
kW
|
Engine capacity
1199
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969
cm3
|
Top speed
150 - 206
km/h
|
Top speed
180
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2023 - 2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Brand
Volvo
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.