VS

Peugeot 208 vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison

Compare performance (156 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (21,000 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 208 or Skoda Kodiaq?

Peugeot 208 vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences

Peugeot 208

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • substantially more electric range
  • considerably lighter
details

Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • significantly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

208

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Peugeot 208 is significantly cheaper – starting at 21,000 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,895 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Peugeot 208 with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 3 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Peugeot 208 offers substantially more range – reaching up to 432 km, about 310 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Kodiaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers considerably more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 109 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Peugeot 208 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers visibly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.

208

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 208 is considerably lighter – 1,165 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 519 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers significantly more boot space – 910 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 558 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries clearly more – 563 kg compared to 430 kg. That’s a difference of about 133 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 119 - 122 km
Peugeot 208
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Peugeot 208

The Peugeot 208 feels like a city-savvy fox: compact, stylish and surprisingly grown-up, with a cabin that punches above its weight and enough personality to make daily commutes a little less boring. It’s a smart pick for buyers who want chic practicality without the showroom bluster — easy to park, thrifty to run and oddly fun when the road tightens up.

details

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq is a practical, well built family SUV that puts space, comfort and usefulness ahead of showy gimmicks. Its composed ride, clever interior packaging and sensible feature set make it an easy, unpretentious choice for daily driving and longer journeys.

details
Peugeot 208
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption

Price
21,000 - 33,200 £
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 15.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
363 - 432 km
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 116 g/km
co2
35 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,165 - 1,530 kg
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Trunk capacity
309 - 352 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,745 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
380 - 430 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manual
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
Brand
Peugeot
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.