Compare performance (240 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (35,100 £ vs 25,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 408 or Renault Kangoo Compact Van?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Kangoo Compact Van is noticeably cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Peugeot 408 costs 35,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,944 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Peugeot 408 uses 2.6 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 2.7 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Peugeot 408 is clearly more efficient: consuming 14.7 kWh/100km compared to 20.5 kWh/100km for the Renault Kangoo Compact Van. That’s a difference of about 5.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Peugeot 408 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 456 km, about 172 km more than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 408 offers considerably more power – delivering 240 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 118 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot 408 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 7.2 s, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van takes 12.3 s. That’s about 5.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot 408 delivers noticeably more torque with 360 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 90 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 408 is marginally lighter – 1,544 kg compared to 1,639 kg. The difference is around 95 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van carries significantly more – 901 kg compared to 456 kg. That’s a difference of about 445 kg.
The Peugeot 408 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Peugeot 408 blends a coupe-like roofline with practical sensibility, delivering striking looks and a surprisingly airy, premium-feeling cabin. On the road it prefers comfort and poise over manic thrills, making it a smart, stylish choice for buyers who want something a bit different from the usual family hatchback.
detailsThe Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
35,100 - 48,000 £
|
Price
25,200 - 37,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.5 - 20.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
79 - 456 km
|
Electric Range
279 - 284 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 114 g/km
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,544 - 1,879 kg
|
Curb weight
1,639 - 1,910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
371 - 456 kg
|
Payload
670 - 901 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 240 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 9.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 - 14.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
230 - 360 Nm
|
Torque
245 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
107 - 176 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
|
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Brand
Renault
|