VS

Peugeot 408 vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison

Compare performance (240 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (35,100 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 408 or Skoda Kodiaq?

Peugeot 408 vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences

Peugeot 408

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • significantly more electric range
  • marginally lighter
details

Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • barely more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

408

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Peugeot 408 is marginally cheaper – starting at 35,100 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,760 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Peugeot 408 with 2.6 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Peugeot 408 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 456 km, about 334 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Kodiaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers barely more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 240 HP. That’s roughly 25 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Peugeot 408 takes 7.2 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers barely more torque with 400 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm more.

408

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 408 is marginally lighter – 1,544 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 140 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries a bit more – 563 kg compared to 456 kg. That’s a difference of about 107 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Peugeot 408 holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £35,100
408

Peugeot 408

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 145 - 240 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.6 - 5 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 79 - 456 km
Peugeot 408
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Peugeot 408

The Peugeot 408 blends a coupe-like roofline with practical sensibility, delivering striking looks and a surprisingly airy, premium-feeling cabin. On the road it prefers comfort and poise over manic thrills, making it a smart, stylish choice for buyers who want something a bit different from the usual family hatchback.

details

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq is a practical, well built family SUV that puts space, comfort and usefulness ahead of showy gimmicks. Its composed ride, clever interior packaging and sensible feature set make it an easy, unpretentious choice for daily driving and longer journeys.

details
Peugeot 408
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption

Price
35,100 - 48,000 £
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
79 - 456 km
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 114 g/km
co2
35 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,544 - 1,879 kg
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
371 - 456 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
145 - 240 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 9.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
230 - 360 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
107 - 176 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
Brand
Peugeot
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.