VS

Peugeot Rifter vs Skoda Kamiq comparison

Compare performance (130 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (22,900 £ vs 22,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot Rifter or Skoda Kamiq?

Peugeot Rifter vs Skoda Kamiq: Key differences

Peugeot Rifter

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more trunk space
details

Skoda Kamiq

4.9 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • a bit more power
  • very slightly more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Rifter

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Kamiq is very slightly cheaper – starting at 22,300 £ , while the Peugeot Rifter costs 22,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 592 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kamiq uses 5.3 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Peugeot Rifter with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

Kamiq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kamiq offers a bit more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 20 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kamiq is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the Peugeot Rifter takes 11.3 s. That’s about 3.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot Rifter delivers moderately more torque with 300 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.

Rifter

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Peugeot Rifter offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is visibly lighter – 1,231 kg compared to 1,498 kg. The difference is around 267 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Peugeot Rifter offers substantially more boot space – 1,050 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 650 L.

When it comes to payload, the Peugeot Rifter carries visibly more – 814 kg compared to 539 kg. That’s a difference of about 275 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Peugeot Rifter has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,900
Rifter

Peugeot Rifter

  • Engine Type Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 102 - 130 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 6.5 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you prioritise everyday practicality and value or a bolder, slightly sportier compact SUV. Both share similar underpinnings, but the Kamiq excels in interior space and efficiency while the T‑Roc offers sharper styling and a …
Skoda Kamiq
VW Taigo
VS
Deciding between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW Taigo? Both are compact crossovers aimed at urban buyers, but the Kamiq emphasizes practicality, interior space and value while the Taigo favors sporty styling and a slightly sharper driving feel—this comparison will help you choose which suits your needs.
Peugeot Rifter
Skoda Kamiq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Peugeot Rifter

The Peugeot Rifter is a practical, family-friendly people carrier that makes everyday errands and weekend escapes feel effortless thanks to its airy cabin and clever, flexible interior. With chunky, purposeful styling and storage solutions everywhere, the Rifter manages to be both unashamedly useful and unexpectedly likeable.

details
PEUGEOT_RIFTER_2102STYP003_Aufhaenger
PEUGEOT_RIFTER_2102STYP100
PEUGEOT_RIFTER_2102STYP101
PEUGEOT_RIFTER_2102STYP207

Reviews Peugeot Rifter

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
retrovill13@gmail.com
5 May 2026, 18:40:42

Citroen Berlingo -ПО дизайну напоминает ,те летающее тарелки из фильма ФАНТОМАС.Где время когда Франция не имела представления ,как должен выглядеть автомобиль.

А вот PEUGEOT RIFTER -Это уже уровень моего представления семейного внедорожника-красовера,и рабочей симпатичной лошадки.Эго и выбрал за это .

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Kamiq

The Skoda Kamiq is a practical, well-built small crossover that mixes city-friendly manners with surprisingly versatile interior space and clever storage solutions. It offers a comfortable ride, user-friendly technology and solid value, making it a sensible choice for everyday driving.

details
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114819
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114822
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ _114865
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ – Kofferraum_114870
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ Interieur_114688

Reviews Skoda Kamiq

4.9 (6 Reviews)
rate
Reg
19 Jul 2026, 13:56:09

Roomy nice ride well made reliable very good value

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Citroen Berlingo
Peugeot Rifter
VS
The Citroën Berlingo and Peugeot Rifter are closely related compact MPVs from Stellantis that focus on practicality, generous interior space and versatile packaging for families and small businesses. Mechanically they’re near-identical, but the Berlingo leans towards comfort and value while the …
Skoda Kamiq
Skoda Epiq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the Skoda Epiq comes down to whether you want compact, city-friendly practicality or a more modern, feature-focused package. This brief comparison highlights the key differences in space, efficiency, tech and driving character so you can decide which suits your …
Skoda Kamiq
Skoda Scala
VS
The Skoda Kamiq is a city‑friendly crossover that trades a bit of sportiness for higher seating, clever storage tricks and SUV looks — great if you want practical versatility and a confident view of the road. The Skoda Scala, meanwhile, is the sharper, more car‑like hatchback with better driving …
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Fabia and Skoda Kamiq comes down to whether you prefer a practical, efficient supermini or a taller, more versatile compact crossover. The Fabia excels for city driving and low running costs, while the Kamiq offers extra interior space, a higher driving position and …
Ford Tourneo Connect
Peugeot Rifter
VS
The Ford Tourneo Connect and the Peugeot Rifter are roomy, practical people-carriers aimed at buyers who need versatile family transport, but they take different approaches: the Tourneo Connect emphasises car-like handling and refined packaging, while the Rifter focuses on rugged styling and highly …
Skoda Kamiq
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Deciding between the Skoda Kamiq and the Suzuki Vitara? This quick, no-nonsense comparison focuses on real-world space, practicality, running costs and driving feel to show which crossover suits your everyday needs.
Kia XCeed
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Comparing the Kia XCeed and Skoda Kamiq highlights two different takes on the small crossover market: the XCeed brings a sportier, hatchback‑derived profile and sharper driving manners, while the Kamiq prioritises practicality, interior space and everyday value. If you want style and driving …
SEAT Ateca
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The SEAT Ateca and Skoda Kamiq are two popular compact SUVs that take different approaches: the Ateca leans toward a roomier, more driver-focused experience while the Kamiq prioritizes city-friendly practicality and efficiency. This comparison will focus on space, driving dynamics, equipment and …
Peugeot Rifter
Skoda Kamiq

Costs and Consumption
Price
22,900 - 30,100 £
Price
22,300 - 32,700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
142 - 157 g/km
co2
121 - 128 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
High Roof Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,498 - 1,694 kg
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
Trunk capacity
322 - 1,050 L
Trunk capacity
400 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,793 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
518 - 814 kg
Payload
439 - 539 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
102 - 130 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.3 - 13.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
75 - 96 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Peugeot
Brand
Skoda
Is the Peugeot Rifter offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.