Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Renault Arkana vs Audi Q4 e-tron comparison
Compare performance (143 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 39,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Audi Q4 e-tron?
Renault Arkana vs Audi Q4 e-tron: Key differences
Renault Arkana
3.8 (6 Reviews)
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Arkana
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Renault Arkana is markedly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Audi Q4 e-tron costs 39,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,100 £.
Q4 e-tron
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers clearly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 197 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q4 e-tron is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 5.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers substantially more torque with 679 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 474 Nm more.
Arkana
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is visibly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 2,035 kg. The difference is around 525 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q4 e-tron carries a bit more – 515 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 64 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q4 e-tron is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £39,600
Audi Q4 e-tron
Renault Arkana
Audi Q4 e-tron
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Renault Arkana
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
Audi Q4 e-tron
The Audi Q4 e-tron brings Audi polish into the electric crossover scene, pairing a sleek exterior with a refined, airy interior that makes everyday driving feel distinctly premium. It’s an easy-to-live-with EV that balances comfort and real-world usability with intuitive tech, making it a smart choice for buyers who want electric mobility without giving up Audi character — and yes, it still looks good in the driveway.
details
Renault Arkana
Audi Q4 e-tron
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
Price
39,600 - 58,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 - 17.4 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
406 - 554 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
77 kWh
|
|
co2
106 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
520 - 535 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,588 mm
|
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
Width
1,865 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,614 - 1,632 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,460 - 1,490 L
|
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Payload
505 - 515 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Audi
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.