VS

Renault Arkana vs Maxus Deliver 3 comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 160 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 33,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Maxus Deliver 3?

Renault Arkana vs Maxus Deliver 3: Key differences

Renault Arkana

4.1 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • slightly lighter
details

Maxus Deliver 3

3.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Arkana

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Arkana is slightly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Maxus Deliver 3 costs 33,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,192 £.

Deliver 3

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Maxus Deliver 3 offers somewhat more power – delivering 160 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 17 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Maxus Deliver 3 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.9 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Maxus Deliver 3 delivers very slightly more torque with 225 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.

Arkana

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Renault Arkana offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is slightly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,690 kg. The difference is around 180 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Maxus Deliver 3 carries clearly more – 970 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 519 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Maxus Deliver 3 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

£33,649
Deliver 3

Maxus Deliver 3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 160 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 20.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 269 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
Kia Sportage
Renault Arkana
VS
The Kia Sportage and Renault Arkana compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Renault Arkana
Maxus Deliver 3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4.1 (8 Reviews)
rate
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.
Claude
19 Aug 2026, 22:32:22

The Arkana's lines are softer on the eye and sportier.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Waldemar
16 Feb 2026, 10:35:42

I've been driving the Arkana for over a year. I'm satisfied. It has met my expectations.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Radek
15 Feb 2026, 18:47:30

A very poor car mechanically — at 98,000 km the fuel pump failed; not even a year later and at 132,000 km the fuel pump failed again, and in the shop the gearbox broke. The car was out of warranty; Renault wanted 38,000 zł. Total junk — I don't recommend this Renault hybrid contraption to anyone.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Maxus Deliver 3

The Maxus Deliver 3 arrives as a sensible, modern workhorse that swaps diesel grime for electric smoothness, offering a roomy cargo bay and a tidy, driver-friendly cabin that makes daily runs feel less like a chore. For small businesses and urban couriers it’s a pragmatic, cost-conscious choice that’s easy to live with — and yes, it even makes parking and tight city turns feel almost enjoyable.

details
serpimg_9iDGGq

Reviews Maxus Deliver 3

3.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
Angel
1 May 2026, 20:27:06

1) I trust the electric technology of the MAXUS more than the hybrid mechanics of the PEUGEOT.
2) If you compare the electric version of the Peugeot with the MAXUS, the Maxus clearly wins. It weighs 400 kg less than the PEUGEOT — which translates to carrying over 900 kg more — and it wears less, even down to the brake pads, than the Peugeot.
I'm thinking of buying a used MAXUS (the short one). I saw this week that there are loads of them four years old with under 30,000 km for €14,000, and they still have three or four years of manufacturer warranty left.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Rafale
VS
The Renault Arkana and Renault Rafale represent two different takes on Renault's crossover line-up: the Arkana is a compact, value-focused coupe-SUV, while the Rafale aims higher as a larger, more premium fastback crossover packed with technology. This comparison strips away the marketing to help …
Kia Niro
Renault Arkana
VS
In the competitive crossover market, the Kia Niro and Renault Arkana both offer distinct advantages. The Kia Niro stands out with its impressive fuel efficiency and eco-friendly hybrid and electric options, catering to environmentally conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana captivates with …
Renault Arkana
Renault Captur
VS
The Renault Arkana and Renault Captur are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want a blend of stylish design, efficient engines and everyday practicality. The Arkana leans into a sleeker coupe‑SUV look and a firmer driving feel, while the Captur favours flexible interior packaging and …
BYD ETP3
Maxus Deliver 3
VS
Unsure whether the BYD ETP3 or the Maxus Deliver 3 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Arkana
VS
The Qashqai and Arkana are two compact SUVs that take different approaches: the Qashqai focuses on everyday practicality and comfort, while the Arkana trades a bit of rear space for a sportier, coupe-like profile and distinctive style. I’ll compare them on the things that matter—space and …
Citroen C4
Renault Arkana
VS
The Citroen C4 and Renault Arkana compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Ford Kuga
Renault Arkana
VS
In the competitive crossover SUV segment, the Ford Kuga and Renault Arkana present two distinct approaches to style and capability. The Ford Kuga impresses with its versatile engine options and spacious interior, making it an ideal choice for family-oriented buyers. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana …
Ford Puma
Renault Arkana
VS
In the fiercely competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Ford Puma distinguishes itself with its agile handling and fuel-efficient mild-hybrid powertrain, offering a sporty yet economical ride. On the other hand, the Renault Arkana turns heads with its sleek coupe-like design and spacious interior, …
Renault Arkana
Maxus Deliver 3

Costs and Consumption
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Price
33,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
20.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
269 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
106 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Curb weight
1,690 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,821 mm
Width
1,780 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
451 kg
Payload
970 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
143 HP
Power HP
160 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 Nm
Torque
225 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
105 kW
Power kW
118 kW
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2023
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Renault
Brand
Maxus
What drive types are available for the Renault Arkana?

The Renault Arkana is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.