@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Renault Group Media
VS

Ford Puma vs Renault Arkana – Which model is better for everyday use?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Ford Puma or Renault Arkana fits your lifestyle better.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Battle of the Stylish Crossovers: Ford Puma vs. Renault Arkana

The compact SUV market has been bustling with contenders aiming to offer the perfect blend of style, efficiency, and practicality. Two such contenders, the Ford Puma and the Renault Arkana, have attracted attention for their unique features and performance capabilities. As we delve into the technical details and innovations of these models, we'll see how each holds its ground in this competitive segment.

Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Design and Dimensions

The Ford Puma, often praised for its athletic profile, is relatively compact with a length ranging between 4186 mm to 4226 mm. Its width at 1805 mm and height up to 1555 mm give it a sporty yet spacious design. In comparison, the Renault Arkana takes on a slightly larger footprint. Measuring 4568 mm in length, it's wider and taller at 1821 mm and 1576 mm respectively, offering a more commanding presence on the road.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Engine Options and Performance

The Ford Puma takes versatility to heart with options for Petrol MHEV and Electric engines. Power ranges from 125 HP to 168 HP, achieving a maximum speed of up to 210 km/h. It showcases admirable acceleration, with its fastest model reaching 100 km/h in 7.4 seconds. The MHEV system boosts efficiency with CO2 emissions as low as 121 g/km and fuel consumption down to 5.4 L/100 km.

On the other hand, Renault Arkana offers hybrid technology with its Full Hybrid and Petrol MHEV engines. The power output varies from 140 HP to 158 HP. While slightly less powerful than the Puma, the Arkana focuses on fuel efficiency, with the Full Hybrid achieving an impressive 4.7 L/100 km and CO2 emissions beginning at 106 g/km. It reaches 100 km/h in 9.1 seconds, and its maximum speed tops at 174 km/h.

Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Transmission and Drive

The Puma comes equipped with either a manual gearbox or a Dual-Clutch Automatic transmission across most models, providing flexibility depending on driving preferences. Both vehicles maintain front-wheel drive ensuring a smooth ride with distinct urban prowess.

Renault's Arkana sticks with an automatic transmission, either standard or dual-clutch, ensuring a smooth and comfortable driving experience, ideal for city and suburban journeys.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Innovations and Practicality

Renault Arkana's hybrid system is among its standout innovations, integrating a smaller 0.6 kWh battery paired with its petrol engine. This configuration optimizes fuel efficiency without sacrificing usability, along with a generous trunk capacity of up to 513 L. The fuel tank capacity of 50 L further enhances its long-distance travel capabilities.

Ford Puma's hybrid technology blends eco-conscious driving with performance. With a battery capacity of 43 kWh for its electric models, it offers an electric range of up to 376 km. Puma also takes pride in its cargo space, with a trunk capacity ranging from 456 L to 523 L, cleverly utilizing space for everyday practicality.

Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Conclusion

Choosing between the Ford Puma and Renault Arkana depends largely on personal preferences and driving habits. The Puma caters to those craving agile performance and a greener footprint with its diverse powertrain offerings. Meanwhile, the Arkana shines in efficiency and practicality, perfect for the eco-conscious urban driver. Both models encapsulate the modern SUV spirit, each with a distinctive twist that makes them worthy contenders in the crossover market.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Puma has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Renault Arkana costs 28500 £. That’s a price difference of around 3686 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Arkana manages with 4.70 L and is therefore slightly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.70 L per 100 km.

Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a to a small extent edge – offering 168 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 25 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 3.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs a bit better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Renault Arkana tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 38 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 290 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 85 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is somewhat lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1510 kg. The difference is around 194 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers slight more room – 523 L compared to 480 L. That’s a difference of about 43 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs minimal better – up to 1283 L, which is about 20 L more than the Renault Arkana.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma slight takes the win – 469 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 18 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Ford Puma proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Puma is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £24,800
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.1 - 13.9 kWh
  • Electric Range : 361 - 376 km
details

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Renault Arkana

4 (1)
rate

The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.

details
r210653p @ Renault Group Media
r210654p @ Renault Group Media
r210665p @ Renault Group Media
r210657p @ Renault Group Media
r210613p @ Renault Group Media
r210616p @ Renault Group Media

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising …
Ford Puma
Renault Arkana
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
28500 - 31900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
4.70 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1510 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
480 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4568 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1821 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1576 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1263 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.80 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
172 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Renault

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Arkana
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Symbioz
VS
In the latest showdown between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz, two distinct design philosophies come to the forefront. The Arkana impresses with its sporty coupe-SUV silhouette and practical versatility, making it perfect for urban drivers who crave style and functionality. Meanwhile, …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Focus
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Golf
VS
In the competitive arena of compact cars, the Ford Puma and VW Golf stand out for their exceptional blend of style and performance. The Puma impresses with its sporty design and agile handling, while the Golf continues to be a benchmark for interior quality and tech features. Ultimately, choosing …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
BYD Dolphin Surf
VS
The Ford Puma and the BYD Dolphin went head-to-head in a thrilling comparison, showcasing unique strengths for diverse drivers. The Ford Puma offers a smooth blend of performance and style with its more traditional compact SUV design, appealing to those who value a sporty driving experience. …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Bayon
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover market, the Ford Puma and Hyundai Bayon both offer compelling choices for urban drivers. The Ford Puma is praised for its sporty handling and stylish design, making it a favorite for those who enjoy a dynamic driving experience. Meanwhile, the Hyundai Bayon …
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.