Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Renault Arkana - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 28500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Renault Arkana?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the Renault Arkana costs 28500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3686 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Arkana manages with 4.70 L and is therefore slightly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.70 L per 100 km.
Arkana
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a to a small extent edge – offering 168 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 25 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 3.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs a bit better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Renault Arkana tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 38 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 290 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 85 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is somewhat lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1510 kg. The difference is around 194 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers slight more room – 523 L compared to 480 L. That’s a difference of about 43 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs minimal better – up to 1283 L, which is about 20 L more than the Renault Arkana.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma slight takes the win – 469 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 18 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Renault Arkana
4 (1 Reviews)
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
Ford Puma
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
28500 - 31900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.70 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
106 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1510 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
480 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4568 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1821 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1576 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1263 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.80 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
172 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.