VS

Ford Puma vs Renault Arkana comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Renault Arkana?

Ford Puma vs Renault Arkana: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • slightly more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter
details

Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more efficient
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Puma

Battle of the Stylish Crossovers: Ford Puma vs. Renault Arkana

The compact SUV market has been bustling with contenders aiming to offer the perfect blend of style, efficiency, and practicality. Two such contenders, the Ford Puma and the Renault Arkana, have attracted attention for their unique features and performance capabilities. As we delve into the technical details and innovations of these models, we'll see how each holds its ground in this competitive segment.

Arkana

Design and Dimensions

The Ford Puma, often praised for its athletic profile, is relatively compact with a length ranging between 4186 mm to 4226 mm. Its width at 1805 mm and height up to 1555 mm give it a sporty yet spacious design. In comparison, the Renault Arkana takes on a slightly larger footprint. Measuring 4568 mm in length, it's wider and taller at 1821 mm and 1576 mm respectively, offering a more commanding presence on the road.

Puma

Engine Options and Performance

The Ford Puma takes versatility to heart with options for Petrol MHEV and Electric engines. Power ranges from 125 HP to 168 HP, achieving a maximum speed of up to 210 km/h. It showcases admirable acceleration, with its fastest model reaching 100 km/h in 7.4 seconds. The MHEV system boosts efficiency with CO2 emissions as low as 121 g/km and fuel consumption down to 5.4 L/100 km.

On the other hand, Renault Arkana offers hybrid technology with its Full Hybrid and Petrol MHEV engines. The power output varies from 140 HP to 158 HP. While slightly less powerful than the Puma, the Arkana focuses on fuel efficiency, with the Full Hybrid achieving an impressive 4.7 L/100 km and CO2 emissions beginning at 106 g/km. It reaches 100 km/h in 9.1 seconds, and its maximum speed tops at 174 km/h.

Arkana

Transmission and Drive

The Puma comes equipped with either a manual gearbox or a Dual-Clutch Automatic transmission across most models, providing flexibility depending on driving preferences. Both vehicles maintain front-wheel drive ensuring a smooth ride with distinct urban prowess.

Renault's Arkana sticks with an automatic transmission, either standard or dual-clutch, ensuring a smooth and comfortable driving experience, ideal for city and suburban journeys.

Puma

Innovations and Practicality

Renault Arkana's hybrid system is among its standout innovations, integrating a smaller 0.6 kWh battery paired with its petrol engine. This configuration optimizes fuel efficiency without sacrificing usability, along with a generous trunk capacity of up to 513 L. The fuel tank capacity of 50 L further enhances its long-distance travel capabilities.

Ford Puma's hybrid technology blends eco-conscious driving with performance. With a battery capacity of 43 kWh for its electric models, it offers an electric range of up to 376 km. Puma also takes pride in its cargo space, with a trunk capacity ranging from 456 L to 523 L, cleverly utilizing space for everyday practicality.

Arkana

Conclusion

Choosing between the Ford Puma and Renault Arkana depends largely on personal preferences and driving habits. The Puma caters to those craving agile performance and a greener footprint with its diverse powertrain offerings. Meanwhile, the Arkana shines in efficiency and practicality, perfect for the eco-conscious urban driver. Both models encapsulate the modern SUV spirit, each with a distinctive twist that makes them worthy contenders in the crossover market.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Puma is somewhat cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Renault Arkana costs 28,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,543 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Arkana uses 4.7 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.

Arkana

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers slightly more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 25 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers markedly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 85 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is slightly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,510 kg. The difference is around 194 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries very slightly more – 469 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 18 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 404 - 417 km
details
Ford Puma
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Bayon
VS
Ford Puma and Hyundai Bayon are compact crossover rivals that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling and efficient engines. This quick comparison highlights how they differ in driving feel, cabin practicality, equipment and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your daily needs.
Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona are two of the most popular compact crossovers, combining practical interiors, elevated driving positions and city-friendly footprints. Choosing between the Puma’s engaging handling and efficient mild-hybrid options and the Kona’s broader engine range and tech-rich …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising …
Renault Arkana
Renault Rafale
VS
The Renault Arkana and Renault Rafale represent two different takes on Renault's crossover line-up: the Arkana is a compact, value-focused coupe-SUV, while the Rafale aims higher as a larger, more premium fastback crossover packed with technology. This comparison strips away the marketing to help …
Ford Puma
Jeep Avenger
VS
The Ford Puma and Jeep Avenger are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want city-friendly dimensions, practical interiors and a dose of SUV styling. The Puma leans toward sporty handling, clever packaging and frugal petrol/mild-hybrid options, while the Avenger prioritises rugged looks and an …
Ford Puma
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,821 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.