Compare performance (143 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 24,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Peugeot 2008?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
As the automotive market continues to evolve, compact SUVs are gaining traction among consumers looking for versatility without compromising on style or functionality. Two of the strongest contenders in this segment are the Peugeot 2008 and the Renault Arkana. This comparison delves into their technical specifications, design innovations, and overall performance to help you decide which one best suits your needs.
The Peugeot 2008 showcases a modern and aggressive SUV design that marries functionality with aesthetics. With a length of 4304 mm, width of 1770 mm, and height of 1523 mm, it offers a compact yet spacious feel. The 2008’s exterior features sharp lines and a distinct front grille that accentuates its sporty character.
On the other hand, the Renault Arkana takes a more coupe-inspired approach with its elongated silhouette. Measuring 4568 mm in length, 1821 mm in width, and 1576 mm in height, the Arkana provides a bolder presence on the road. Its sloping roofline and sleek design elements contribute to both aerodynamics and visual appeal.
Performance is at the heart of any vehicle, and both the Peugeot 2008 and Renault Arkana deliver in this regard. The 2008 offers a variety of engine options, including MHEV and fully electric variants. Power outputs range from 101 HP to 156 HP, providing options for different driving styles. The 2008 also features a choice between automatic and manual transmissions, offering flexibility in driving preferences.
In comparison, the Arkana boasts engine options that include a full hybrid and petrol MHEV engines, with power output ranging from 140 HP to 158 HP. The Arkana’s engine repertoire emphasizes efficiency, achieving exceptional fuel consumption figures of as low as 4.7 L/100km, making it a great choice for eco-conscious drivers.
The Peugeot 2008 excels in acceleration, particularly with its higher-powered variants, achieving 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds. This sharp performance is complemented by its responsive handling and front-wheel-drive setup, providing an enjoyable driving experience.
In contrast, the Renault Arkana’s performance clocks a 0-100 km/h time of 9.1 seconds at its best. While not as quick as the 2008, it still offers commendable performance, particularly for daily commuting and city driving. The Arkana’s handling is enhanced by its slightly lower center of gravity due to its coupe-like design.
Fuel efficiency is a critical aspect for most buyers. The Peugeot 2008 shows impressive numbers across its range, with the most efficient version consuming just 5 L/100 km, while its fully electric variant offers an electric range of up to 406 km. The CO2 emissions for the 2008 can vary, going as low as 113 g/km depending on the engine choice.
The Renault Arkana raises the bar slightly in this category, boasting a superb fuel consumption of 4.7 L/100 km. Its hybrid technology enhances fuel efficiency, making it an excellent option for environmentally-conscious consumers. The emissions range from 106 g/km to 135 g/km, depending on the chosen engine setup.
Inside, the Peugeot 2008 offers a stylish and modern cabin with high-quality materials, an intuitive infotainment system, and spacious seating for five. The trunk space of 434 liters is competitive in this segment, allowing for ample cargo capacity. The 2008 also welcomes technological innovations, such as a head-up display and a digital cockpit, enhancing the driving experience.
The Renault Arkana does not fall short in terms of interior quality, featuring a contemporary layout with premium materials and a user-friendly infotainment system. It excels in trunk space, offering between 480 to 513 liters, catering to those needing extra storage. Moreover, the Arkana's cabin includes advanced safety features and driver aids, providing peace of mind on the road.
Choosing between the Peugeot 2008 and Renault Arkana ultimately depends on your preferences and priorities. If you crave a sportier dynamic with advanced hybrid options, the 2008 might suit you well. However, if fuel efficiency, ample trunk space, and sleek design capture your attention, then the Arkana could be the ideal choice.
Both SUVs have their strengths and cater to different segments within the compact SUV market. Whichever you choose, both the Peugeot 2008 and the Renault Arkana promise to deliver a blend of practicality and style for today’s modern driver.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Peugeot 2008 is slightly cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Renault Arkana costs 28,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,695 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Arkana uses 4.7 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Peugeot 2008 with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 2008 offers very slightly more power – delivering 156 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 13 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot 2008 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot 2008 delivers markedly more torque with 270 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 2008 is a bit lighter – 1,263 kg compared to 1,510 kg. The difference is around 247 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Arkana carries very slightly more – 451 kg compared to 447 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.
The Peugeot 2008 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
The Peugeot 2008 is a stylish, city-friendly crossover that packs big character into a compact package, turning mundane errands into a mildly entertaining drive. Its clever interior layout, polished looks and confident ride make it a smart choice for buyers who want practical daily sense with a touch of flair.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
Price
24,800 - 40,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.3 - 15.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
405 - 406 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
|
|
co2
106 g/km
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
Curb weight
1,263 - 1,623 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
434 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,304 mm
|
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
Width
1,770 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,523 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,467 L
|
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Payload
407 - 447 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
150 - 206 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España