Compare performance (143 HP vs 325 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 35,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Peugeot 3008?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
As the compact SUV segment continues to boom, the Peugeot 3008 and Renault Arkana stand out as two formidable contenders. Both hailing from renowned French manufacturers, these models offer a blend of style, innovation, and performance. Let's delve into the technical aspects and innovations that define these SUVs, helping potential buyers make an informed decision.
The Peugeot 3008 and Renault Arkana, while both classified as SUVs, present distinct design philosophies. The 3008 measures 4542mm in length, 1895mm in width, and 1641mm in height. It's known for its bold exterior, characterized by sharp lines and a distinctive front grille, reflecting Peugeot's modern design language.
The Arkana, on the other hand, is slightly longer at 4568mm, narrower at 1821mm, and lower in height at 1576mm. Its coupe-like silhouette distinguishes it from traditional SUVs, striking a balance between sporty design and practicality.
Peugeot offers a versatile range of powertrains in the 3008, including petrol MHEV, plug-in hybrid, and electric variants, delivering from 136 HP to 231 HP. The electric model boasts an impressive range of up to 698 km, thanks to a substantial 96.9 kWh battery.
The Renault Arkana provides a simpler lineup with full hybrid and petrol MHEV options. Power outputs range from 140 HP to 158 HP, with a fuel consumption of just 4.7 L/100km for the hybrid model, showcasing its efficiency.
Both SUVs feature automatic transmissions, but the 3008 has the edge with options including a dual-clutch automatic and a reduction gearbox, promoting a smoother drive. Meanwhile, the Arkana comes equipped with either a traditional automatic gearbox or a dual-clutch option, depending on the variant, offering a reliable driving experience.
Inside, both the 3008 and Arkana comfortably seat five occupants. The 3008 impresses with a trunk capacity of 520 liters, making it ideal for families who need more cargo space. The Arkana offers 480 liters, or 513 liters in certain trims, slightly less than its rival but still ample for everyday needs.
Environmental consciousness is a growing factor for many buyers. The 3008’s plug-in hybrid and full-electric variants contribute to a lower carbon footprint with CO2 emissions as low as 0 g/km, aligning with a renewable energy future. In contrast, the Arkana's hybrid model offers emissions starting at 106 g/km, highlighting efficiency with a touch of traditional combustion engineering.
Choosing between the Peugeot 3008 and Renault Arkana comes down to individual preferences and requirements. The 3008 excels with a broader range of powertrains, particularly appealing to those wanting a full-electric option or enhanced cargo space. Meanwhile, the Arkana stands out with its efficient hybrid system and sporty design, ideal for those looking to combine practicality with a touch of flair.
Ultimately, both SUVs deliver on the promise of comfort, style, and performance, cementing their positions as significant players in the compact SUV segment. Whichever model you lean towards, both offer a testament to the innovation and evolution of the modern SUV.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Arkana is clearly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Peugeot 3008 costs 35,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,685 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Peugeot 3008 uses 2.4 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.3 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 3008 offers substantially more power – delivering 325 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 182 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot 3008 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 6 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 4.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot 3008 delivers clearly more torque with 511 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 306 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is barely lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,648 kg. The difference is around 138 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Peugeot 3008 carries barely more – 467 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.
The Peugeot 3008 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
The Peugeot 3008 blends bold French styling with a surprisingly grown-up interior that makes even dull commutes feel a little bit special. Practical enough for family life yet lively to drive, it’s a clever all‑rounder that stands out from the crossover crowd without shouting for attention.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
Price
35,100 - 52,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 5.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 - 17.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
81 - 698 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
0.4 - 96.9 kWh
|
|
co2
106 g/km
|
co2
0 - 121 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
Curb weight
1,648 - 2,266 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
470 - 520 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,542 mm
|
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
Width
1,895 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,641 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,430 - 1,480 L
|
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Payload
432 - 467 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
Power HP
145 - 325 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 10.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
170 - 201 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 511 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
Power kW
107 - 239 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, B
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España