Compare performance (143 HP vs 225 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 35,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Peugeot 408?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the bustling world of SUVs, the latest contenders vying for attention are the Peugeot 408 and the Renault Arkana. Both vehicles represent the innovative spirit of their respective brands, offering distinct features and technical capabilities. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which of these stylish SUVs meets your needs the best.
The physical presence of a vehicle often sets the tone for first impressions. The Peugeot 408 stands as a sleek entry with its dimensions of 4687 mm in length, 1848 mm in width, and 1478 mm in height. This gives it a broader stature compared to the Renault Arkana, which measures 4568 mm in length, 1821 mm in width, and 1576 mm in height. Both vehicles sport a sporty five-door configuration, emphasizing practicality without compromising on aesthetics.
The Peugeot 408 offers a versatile engine lineup, available in petrol mild-hybrid (MHEV), plug-in hybrid, and electric configurations. Power output varies between 136 HP and a robust 225 HP, with torque ranging from 230 Nm to 360 Nm, ensuring a responsive drive in different conditions. The Renault Arkana, meanwhile, focuses on a full hybrid and petrol MHEV options, with horsepower ranging from 140 HP to 158 HP and torque between 205 Nm and 270 Nm.
Both vehicles exhibit commendable efficiency, yet there's a notable distinction in their eco-footprint. The Peugeot 408 impresses with a commendable hybrid consumption rate of 1.5 to 1.4 L/100 km and an electric range stretching up to 453 km. CO2 emissions range from 116 g/km down to zero, depending on the engine choice. The Arkana's consumption is competitively efficient, offering figures from 4.7 to 6 L/100 km, with corresponding CO2 emissions ranging from 106 to 135 g/km.
Transmission technology plays a pivotal role in the driving experience. The Peugeot 408 integrates both dual-clutch and automatic gearboxes, tailored to its diverse engine offerings. Renault Arkana similarly provides an automatic gearbox, emphasizing seamless transitions and a smoother drive. Both models are equipped with front-wheel drive, favoring stability and control on the road.
Inside, both vehicles comfortably seat five occupants, ensuring a spacious and comfortable journey. In terms of cargo space, the Peugeot 408 offers a roomy trunk capacity varying between 471 and 536 liters, compared to the Renault Arkana's range of 480 to 513 liters, depending on the configuration. Each SUV's interior layout prioritizes driver and passenger comfort without sacrificing utility.
The decision between the Peugeot 408 and Renault Arkana ultimately depends on your priorities. The Peugeot 408 is ideal for those keen on advanced hybrid and electric technologies, coupled with a slightly larger physique. On the other hand, the Renault Arkana presents an excellent choice for individuals valuing efficient hybrid performance, balanced with its agile dimensions. Both SUVs underscore innovation and modern design, ensuring that the choice between them reflects personal preference and driving aspirations.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Arkana is clearly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Peugeot 408 costs 35,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,660 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Peugeot 408 uses 2.7 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 408 offers noticeably more power – delivering 225 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 82 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot 408 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 7.2 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot 408 delivers clearly more torque with 360 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 155 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is marginally lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,544 kg. The difference is around 34 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Peugeot 408 carries very slightly more – 456 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 5 kg.
The Peugeot 408 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
The Peugeot 408 blends a coupe-like roofline with practical sensibility, delivering striking looks and a surprisingly airy, premium-feeling cabin. On the road it prefers comfort and poise over manic thrills, making it a smart, stylish choice for buyers who want something a bit different from the usual family hatchback.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
Price
35,100 - 48,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 5.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
79 - 455 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
58.2 kWh
|
|
co2
106 g/km
|
co2
0 - 114 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 52 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
Curb weight
1,544 - 1,879 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
471 - 536 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,687 mm
|
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,478 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,528 - 1,583 L
|
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Payload
371 - 456 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 9.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
160 - 233 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 360 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, B
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España