VS

Renault Arkana vs Skoda Octavia Combi comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 25,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Skoda Octavia Combi?

Renault Arkana vs Skoda Octavia Combi: Key differences

Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
details

Skoda Octavia Combi

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • noticeably more power
  • barely more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Arkana

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Octavia Combi is a bit cheaper – starting at 25,600 £ , while the Renault Arkana costs 28,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,880 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Octavia Combi uses 4.4 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

Octavia Combi

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Octavia Combi offers noticeably more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 61 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Octavia Combi is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 6.7 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 4.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Octavia Combi delivers clearly more torque with 360 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 155 Nm more.

Arkana

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Octavia Combi is slightly lighter – 1,366 kg compared to 1,510 kg. The difference is around 144 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Octavia Combi carries somewhat more – 534 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 83 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Octavia Combi is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,600
Octavia Combi

Skoda Octavia Combi

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 204 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.4 - 6.9 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
Skoda Octavia Combi
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
VS
The Skoda Octavia Combi and the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports are two of the most practical estate cars on the market, each promising roomy cabins and sensible running costs for families and commuters. This comparison focuses on cargo space, fuel efficiency, driving dynamics and overall value to …
Renault Arkana
Skoda Octavia Combi

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Skoda Octavia Combi

The Skoda Octavia Combi is a practical, well‑packaged estate that delivers generous and flexible interior space ideal for families or active owners. Its sensible cabin layout, comfortable ride and solid reputation for reliability make it a pragmatic choice for buyers who value utility over flash.

details
SKODA_OCTAVIA_COMBI_Dynamisch_116407
SKODA_OCTAVIA_COMBI_Dynamisch_116406
SKODA_OCTAVIA_COMBI_Dynamisch_116402
SKODA_OCTAVIA_COMBI_e_TEC_116372

Reviews Skoda Octavia Combi

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Roberto
25 May 2026, 05:05:18

Una gran elección para autopista

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Roberto
25 May 2026, 04:58:36

Tiene mucho más espacio por menos dinero

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Andrzej
12 May 2026, 15:17:48

Great car with a dynamic 1.5 engine and a 7-speed automatic; a downside is the electronics, which often shut off—terrible when reversing!!! It could also have a bigger tank because it averages 7 liters and at most 700 km.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
Choosing between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Austral comes down to whether you want a coupe‑styled compact SUV that prioritises flair and efficiency (Arkana) or a more conventional family SUV that emphasises space and refinement (Austral). This comparison will cut through the marketing to …
Skoda Octavia Combi
VW Golf Variant
VS
If your shopping list includes a boot that can swallow flat-pack furniture and weekend sports equipment without complaint, the Skoda Octavia Estate is the sensible giant with massive practicality and smart value, while the VW Golf Estate packages similar underpinnings into a neater, more refined …
Skoda Octavia Combi
Kia K4
VS
The Skoda Octavia Combi and Kia K4 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Skoda Karoq
Skoda Octavia Combi
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs and wagons, the Skoda Karoq and Skoda Octavia Combi each offer unique advantages suited to different driving preferences. The Skoda Karoq boasts a higher driving position and versatile off-road capabilities, perfect for adventurers seeking practicality …
Kia Ceed Sportswagon
Skoda Octavia Combi
VS
Family-hauling face-off: the Kia Ceed Sportswagon serves big spec, a sweet drive and a long warranty for hatchback money, while the Skoda Octavia Estate counters with limo-like rear legroom, a cavernous boot and a more polished ride. If you prize value and low running costs, pick the Kia; if space, …
Skoda Octavia Combi
Volvo V60
VS
Unsure whether the Skoda Octavia Combi or the Volvo V60 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Renault Arkana
Renault Captur
VS
The Renault Arkana and Renault Captur are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want a blend of stylish design, efficient engines and everyday practicality. The Arkana leans into a sleeker coupe‑SUV look and a firmer driving feel, while the Captur favours flexible interior packaging and …
Renault Arkana
Toyota C-HR
VS
Renault Arkana and Toyota C-HR go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Renault Arkana
Skoda Octavia Combi

Costs and Consumption
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Price
25,600 - 39,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
106 g/km
co2
113 - 157 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Curb weight
1,366 - 1,553 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
640 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,821 mm
Width
1,829 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
451 kg
Payload
502 - 534 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
143 HP
Power HP
116 - 204 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 10.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 Nm
Torque
220 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
105 kW
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, C
Brand
Renault
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the Renault Arkana?

The Renault Arkana is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.