VS

Renault Arkana vs Suzuki Swift comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 82 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Suzuki Swift?

Renault Arkana vs Suzuki Swift: Key differences

Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
details

Suzuki Swift

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • very slightly more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Arkana

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Suzuki Swift is considerably cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Renault Arkana costs 28,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,315 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Swift uses 4.4 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

Swift

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Arkana offers substantially more power – delivering 143 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 61 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Arkana delivers substantially more torque with 205 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 93 Nm more.

Arkana

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swift is considerably lighter – 1,069 kg compared to 1,510 kg. The difference is around 441 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Arkana carries noticeably more – 451 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 155 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Arkana is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £28,500
Arkana

Renault Arkana

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 143 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.7 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swift
Toyota Aygo
VS
If you want a pocket rocket that’s actually practical, the Suzuki Swift mixes sprightly handling, a surprisingly roomy cabin and sensible running costs — ideal for buyers who want fun without sacrificing everyday usability. The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, is the cheeky city specialist: cheaper to buy, …
Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
Renault Arkana
Suzuki Swift

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Suzuki Swift

The Suzuki Swift is a cheeky little hatch that turns city streets into its playground with lively handling and a grin-inducing drive. Practical enough for daily chores, thrifty to run and kinder on your wallet than many rivals, it's a sensible pick for buyers who want fun without drama.

details
SUZUKI-519
SUZUKI SWIFT-678
SUZUKI SWIFT-954
SUZUKI-058
SUZUKI SWIFT-672
Swift_3

Reviews Suzuki Swift

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
Kris
9 Apr 2026, 18:26:38

Superb quality, fun to drive, and every bit of well layed out kit you'll ever need.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Ignis
Suzuki Swift
VS
Choosing between the Ignis and the Swift boils down to whether you want a feisty, high-riding city crossover with extra practicality or a more composed, sportier hatch with sharper handling. The Ignis stands out for its compact SUV character and clever packaging, while the Swift delivers a peppier …
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
Choosing between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Austral comes down to whether you want a coupe‑styled compact SUV that prioritises flair and efficiency (Arkana) or a more conventional family SUV that emphasises space and refinement (Austral). This comparison will cut through the marketing to …
Renault Arkana
Renault Rafale
VS
The Renault Arkana and Renault Rafale represent two different takes on Renault's crossover line-up: the Arkana is a compact, value-focused coupe-SUV, while the Rafale aims higher as a larger, more premium fastback crossover packed with technology. This comparison strips away the marketing to help …
Kia Picanto
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Kia Picanto and Suzuki Swift are two popular small hatchbacks that balance low running costs with practical, city-friendly dimensions. This comparison focuses on real-world usability, ownership costs and driving experience to help you pick the right one.
Fiat 500
Suzuki Swift
VS
Choosing between the Fiat 500 and the Suzuki Swift comes down to whether you prefer retro Italian charm and compact city style or a more practical, versatile hatchback with sharper handling. This comparison looks at space, fuel economy, driving feel, equipment and running costs to help you decide …
Honda Jazz
Suzuki Swift
VS
Choosing between the Honda Jazz and the Suzuki Swift comes down to whether you prioritise interior space and everyday practicality or a punchy, fun-to-drive hatchback with lower running costs. The Jazz is prized for its flexible cabin and comfortable urban manners, while the Swift offers sharper …
Suzuki Swift
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Choosing between the Suzuki Swift and the Suzuki Vitara comes down to whether you want a nimble city hatchback or a roomier compact SUV. The Swift excels with light steering, efficient running costs and easy parking, while the Vitara offers higher seating, more cargo space and light off-road …
Dacia Sandero
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Dacia Sandero and Suzuki Swift are two sensible choices in the small-car segment that take different approaches: the Sandero emphasizes no‑frills value and space, while the Swift aims for sharper handling and a more polished feel. This comparison will focus on practicality, running costs, …
Renault Arkana
Suzuki Swift

Costs and Consumption
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Price
17,100 - 21,200 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
106 g/km
co2
98 - 110 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Curb weight
1,069 - 1,145 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,821 mm
Width
1,735 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
451 kg
Payload
282 - 296 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
143 HP
Power HP
82 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 Nm
Torque
112 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
105 kW
Power kW
61 kW
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,197 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Renault
Brand
Suzuki
What drive types are available for the Renault Arkana?

The Renault Arkana is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.