Compare performance (200 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (29,900 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Austral or Skoda Elroq?
In the ever-evolving world of SUVs, the choices continue to become more diverse and innovative. Two contenders making waves in the market are the Renault Austral and the Skoda Elroq. Both vehicles offer distinct advantages, each catering to different consumer preferences. Let's explore the technical aspects and innovations these models bring to the table.
The Renault Austral is available as either a Petrol Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) or a full hybrid, offering power outputs of 158 HP and 200 HP respectively. The choice between a 1332 cm³ four-cylinder engine or a 1199 cm³ three-cylinder engine allows drivers to select based on performance needs. With a torque of 270 Nm and a top speed of 174 km/h, the Austral provides a balanced drive. Acceleration-wise, it clocks 0-100 km/h in 9.7 seconds for the MHEV and 8.4 seconds for the full hybrid, offering brisk performance in urban environments.
In contrast, the Skoda Elroq embraces an all-electric format, boasting various power outputs ranging from 170 HP to 286 HP, with the top variant employing a powerful 210 kW motor. With torque capabilities of up to 545 Nm, the Elroq is geared for powerful acceleration, achieving 0-100 km/h in as quick as 6.6 seconds. The maximum speed territory is slightly lower than Austral, with a top speed of 180 km/h, offering ample power for the eco-friendly driver.
The Austral's hybrid system guarantees efficient consumption rates, achieving 6.1 L/100km for its hybrid variant and an impressively low 4.7 L/100km for the full hybrid. Given its 55 L fuel tank, the Austral presents a solid option for longer journeys without frequent stops.
Skoda's Elroq, leveraging its electric efficiency, offers an impressive electric range between 375 km to a significant 580 km depending on the chosen battery configuration. The Elroq's consumption ranges from 15.2 kWh/100km to 16.4 kWh/100km, making it an excellent choice for eco-friendly conscious customers. It boasts zero CO2 emissions, which awards it an A-class CO2 efficiency rating.
Both SUVs provide roominess fitting for family or adventure needs. The Austral is slightly longer, measuring 4510 mm, and provides a trunk capacity of 500 L. These dimensions make the Austral an ideal choice if prioritized storage is required.
The Elroq, however, optimizes on interior cabin space with its broad width of 1884 mm and a trunk capacity of 470 L, which is adequate for most excursion requirements. Its length and height are slightly more compact at 4488 mm and 1625 mm respectively, providing ease of maneuverability.
The Renault Austral and Skoda Elroq represent two sophisticated options in the SUV segment, each catering to different lifestyles and priorities. The Austral offers traditionalists a hybrid-powered driving experience coupled with efficient fuel consumption and adequate performance. On the other hand, Skoda Elroq is a dream come true for any environment-savvy enthusiast looking for an electric vehicle with considerable range, powerful performance, and sustainability. Ultimately, whether you prioritize green credentials or prefer a hybrid synergy, both the Austral and Elroq exemplify innovation for their respective paths in the SUV lineage.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Austral is noticeably cheaper – starting at 29,900 £ , while the Skoda Elroq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,954 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Elroq offers substantially more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 200 HP. That’s roughly 140 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Elroq is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Renault Austral takes 8.4 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 180 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Elroq delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 409 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Austral is clearly lighter – 1,548 kg compared to 2,133 kg. The difference is around 585 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Austral offers somewhat more boot space – 527 L compared to 470 L. That’s a difference of about 57 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Renault Austral offers marginally more capacity – up to 1,736 L, about 156 L more than the Skoda Elroq.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Elroq carries very slightly more – 517 kg compared to 477 kg. That’s a difference of about 40 kg.
The Skoda Elroq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Austral dresses the family SUV in elegant modern looks and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that feels thoughtful and livable. It balances comfort and clever technology with a relaxed road presence—an appealing choice for buyers who want style and everyday sense without fuss.
details
The Skoda Elroq is a cleverly packaged family SUV that mixes roomy practicality with sharp, modern looks, making it an easy pick for buyers who prefer common sense over flash. On the road it's composed and user-friendly, with thoughtful interior details that turn everyday driving into something pleasantly efficient — a sensible companion with a wink.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,900 - 37,800 £
|
Price
37,900 - 45,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 6.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 16.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
529 - 573 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
77 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
109 - 145 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,548 - 1,613 kg
|
Curb weight
2,133 - 2,268 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
527 L
|
Trunk capacity
470 L
|
|
Length
4,533 mm
|
Length
4,488 mm
|
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
Width
1,884 mm
|
|
Height
1,645 mm
|
Height
1,608 - 1,625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,736 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,580 L
|
|
Payload
455 - 477 kg
|
Payload
470 - 517 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
148 - 200 HP
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
270 Nm
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
109 - 147 kW
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,332 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España