Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Renault Austral vs Skoda Kodiaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (200 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (29700 £ vs 36800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Austral or Skoda Kodiaq?
Austral
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Austral has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29700 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7106 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Renault Austral with 4.80 L. The difference is about 3.30 L per 100 km.
Kodiaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a distinct edge – offering 265 HP compared to 200 HP. That’s roughly 65 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Renault Austral takes 8.40 s. That’s about 2.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Renault Austral tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 51 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls noticeable stronger with 400 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Austral
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Renault Austral is barely noticeable lighter – 1539 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 145 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers distinct more room – 910 L compared to 555 L. That’s a difference of about 355 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs a bit better – up to 2105 L, which is about 344 L more than the Renault Austral.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq to a small extent takes the win – 563 kg compared to 477 kg. That’s a difference of about 86 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Kodiaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Renault Austral
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £36,800
Skoda Kodiaq
Renault Austral
4.9 (3 Reviews)
The Renault Austral dresses the family SUV in elegant modern looks and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that feels thoughtful and livable. It balances comfort and clever technology with a relaxed road presence—an appealing choice for buyers who want style and everyday sense without fuss.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
5 (2 Reviews)
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Renault Austral
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29700 - 37800 £
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 6.5 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
109 - 148 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1539 - 1613 kg
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
527 - 555 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
4533 mm
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
|
Width
1825 mm
|
Width
1864 mm
|
|
Height
1645 mm
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1736 - 1761 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
|
|
Payload
464 - 477 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
158 - 200 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
|
Torque
270 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
116 - 147 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1332 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drivetrain options does the Renault Austral have?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.