VS

Renault Austral vs VW T-Cross comparison

Compare performance (148 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (29,900 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Austral or VW T-Cross?

Renault Austral vs VW T-Cross: Key differences

Renault Austral

4.9 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more trunk space
details

VW T-Cross

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • marginally more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Austral

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

VW T-Cross is visibly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Renault Austral costs 29,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,520 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW T-Cross uses 5.4 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Renault Austral with 6.4 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.

T-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the VW T-Cross offers marginally more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 148 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW T-Cross is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 8.4 s, while the Renault Austral takes 9.9 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Austral delivers only slightly more torque with 270 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.

Austral

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW T-Cross is clearly lighter – 1,267 kg compared to 1,548 kg. The difference is around 281 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Renault Austral offers slightly more boot space – 555 L compared to 455 L. That’s a difference of about 100 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW T-Cross carries marginally more – 480 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW T-Cross is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,400
T-Cross

VW T-Cross

  • Engine Type Petrol
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 95 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Austral
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Austral and the Renault Symbioz represent two very different faces of Renault: the Austral is a production compact SUV focused on practicality and comfort, while the Symbioz is a concept show car that explores radical design and future technologies. Comparing them helps buyers choose …
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
The Renault Austral and Renault Rafale represent two different takes on the modern Renault SUV: the Austral is a practical, family-oriented compact SUV, while the Rafale aims for a sportier, more premium coupé-SUV character. This comparison focuses on real-world driving, features and ownership …
Renault Austral
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Austral

The Renault Austral is a stylish, well-built crossover that blends a comfortable ride with a spacious, modern cabin. It combines everyday-friendly refinement and contemporary technology with a focus on safety and practicality, making it a sensible choice for drivers who want an all-round family car.

details
r220291p
r220293p
r220394p
r221062p
r221121p
r221115p

Reviews Renault Austral

4.9 (6 Reviews)
rate
Paulo
25 Aug 2026, 14:25:06

More elegant and comfortable to drive, very good fuel economy and, if you find one with low mileage, much better value for money.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

VW T-Cross

The VW T-Cross is a small, city-friendly crossover that blends practical packaging with easygoing driving manners and a high seating position for good visibility. It’s a sensible, comfortable choice for buyers who want the convenience and style of an SUV without big compromises.

details
DB2021AU01108_medium
DB2021AU01109_medium
DB2021AU01111_medium
DB2021AU01114_medium
DB2021AU01120_medium
DB2021AU01124_medium

Reviews VW T-Cross

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Jarek
12 Sept 2026, 16:16:59

Very capable and well-built car. Good on the road, nicely quiet up to 100 km/h. Praise for the 1.5 TSI engine — very dynamic and very economical. Over a distance of 36,000 km the average fuel consumption is 6.2 liters per 100 km. Half on high-speed roads, half in the city. Driven with a heavy foot.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Arturo
27 May 2026, 04:19:26

In terms of interior space and driving, the T‑Cross is far superior.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Monika
12 Feb 2026, 07:34:19

I chose the T‑Cross — more comfortable and roomier inside, especially for adult passengers; bought on the model‑year clearance — running costs work out cheaper even taking into account fuel savings from the Toyota hybrid (planned over five years); I like the space and the VW suited me better — I prefer the view through the front windshield.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Erasmo Paone
21 Oct 2025, 21:49:59

Very practical, interior space is excellent. Lacks charm, fuel consumption is a bit high.

Frequently compared as well

VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
The VW Polo is a nimble, wallet-friendly hatch that makes city driving and tight parking effortless, while the VW T-Cross trades the Polo’s sprightliness for SUV practicality — higher seating, a roomier boot and a more commanding road presence. Pick the Polo if you want cheap, lively motoring; …
Ford Kuga
Renault Austral
VS
The Ford Kuga and Renault Austral are two compelling compact SUVs that blend practicality, comfort and efficiency while taking different approaches to driving character and cabin design. If you prefer a more engaging drive and sharper handling, the Kuga is the likelier pick; if you favour a refined …
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Cross
VS
The Skoda Kamiq and VW T-Cross are direct rivals in the small crossover segment, offering compact, practical packaging and easy urban manners. This quick comparison cuts through the similarities to show which model is stronger on space, equipment, driving feel and value so you can pick the right …
Citroen C3 Aircross
VW T-Cross
VS
Putting the Citroën C3 Aircross up against the VW T‑Cross pits a characterful, comfort-focused small SUV against a more conservative, all-round practical choice. Both target urban buyers who need space and versatility, but they differ in ride, interior quality and features—pick the C3 Aircross for …
VW T-Cross
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volkswagen T-Cross and T-Roc are compact SUVs that share family DNA but target different buyers. The T-Cross prioritizes urban practicality, low running costs and easy parking, while the T-Roc offers more interior space, stronger engine options and a sportier driving character.
Hyundai Bayon
VW T-Cross
VS
The Hyundai Bayon and VW T‑Cross are two popular compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want small‑car agility with SUV practicality, easy city driving and low running costs. The Bayon punches above its weight on value, tech and bold styling, while the T‑Cross leans towards a more refined interior, …
Renault Austral
Renault Captur
VS
The Renault Austral and Renault Captur are two very different SUVs in Renault’s line-up — the Austral is a larger, more upmarket compact SUV while the Captur targets urban buyers with a smaller footprint and lighter running costs. I’ll outline the key differences in size, practicality, powertrains, …
Kia Sportage
Renault Austral
VS
The Kia Sportage is the sensible, value-packed family SUV — comfortable, practical and a reliable all-rounder — while the Renault Austral plays the style card with a sharper interior, clever hybrid tech and more upmarket flair. Pick the Sportage for straightforward practicality and a friendlier …
Renault Austral
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
29,900 - 34,100 £
Price
21,400 - 32,000 £
Consumption L/100km
6.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
145 g/km
co2
124 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,548 kg
Curb weight
1,267 - 1,338 kg
Trunk capacity
555 L
Trunk capacity
455 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,825 mm
Width
1,784 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
455 kg
Payload
463 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
148 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
270 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
109 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,332 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Renault
Brand
VW
What drivetrain options does the Renault Austral have?

The Renault Austral is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.