Compare performance (158 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (21,100 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Captur or Mitsubishi ASX?
When it comes to the competitive world of SUVs, both Mitsubishi and Renault are powerful players that provide unique features and innovative technologies. In this article, we delve into a head-to-head comparison of their latest models, focusing on technical aspects, innovations, and on-road performance.
The 2024 models from both Mitsubishi and Renault reflect a dedication to performance with diverse engine options. Mitsubishi offers various choices, including petrol and petrol Mild Hybrid engines, with outputs ranging from 91 HP to 158 HP. In contrast, Renault showcases its versatility with full hybrid systems and LPG options alongside traditional petrol engines, providing a range of horsepower output from 91 HP to 158 HP as well.
Fuel efficiency is a cornerstone of modern vehicle design. Mitsubishi's range sees consumption figures as low as 4.7 L/100km, while Renault matches this with its most economical options coming in at similar levels. This indicates a commitment to sustainability while maintaining performance.
Both manufacturers employ a Front-Wheel Drive configuration, facilitating control and stability on a variety of terrains. Mitsubishi offers several transmission options, including a manual gearbox and a dual-clutch automatic, complementing its sportier variants. Similarly, Renault provides a well-rounded lineup with automatic and manual gearbox choices, enhancing driver engagement and comfort.
The Mitsubishi models display impressive acceleration, with times ranging from 8.5 seconds to 14 seconds for 0-100 km/h, depending on the engine variant. On the other hand, Renault’s acceleration times are slightly more varied, with the top performers reaching 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.5 seconds, cementing Renault’s reputation for sporty dynamics.
In terms of top speed, Mitsubishi peaks at 180 km/h, while Renault offers a similar range, with some models reaching up to 173 km/h. Both manufacturers balance speed with practicality, ensuring that drivers can enjoy spirited performance while maintaining safety and fuel efficiency.
Dimensions play a crucial role in the perception of space and comfort. Both Mitsubishi and Renault boast similar dimensions; both models feature a length of 4239 mm, width of 1797 mm, and height of 1575 mm. The interior space is optimized for comfort with arrangements for five passengers in both brands.
When it comes to trunk capacity, Mitsubishi takes the lead with 484 liters, while Renault offers a commendable 422 liters, making both options suitable for families and individuals alike. The balance of passenger comfort and cargo space makes these SUVs excellent choices for dynamic lifestyles.
The automotive market is increasingly driven by innovation. Mitsubishi has integrated new technologies into its vehicles, focusing on driver assistance systems, enhanced infotainment, and connectivity features. These advancements improve safety and convenience on the road.
Renault has also embraced cutting-edge technology, particularly in its hybrid models. With features like energy regeneration systems and advanced navigation software, Renault ensures that its vehicles are future-proof and environmentally conscious. With both brands prioritizing innovation, consumers can expect a host of modern amenities and safety technologies.
The choice between Mitsubishi and Renault ultimately comes down to personal preference and specific driving needs. Each brand offers robust SUV options that excel in performance, efficiency, and innovation. Whether it’s Mitsubishi's solid reputation for reliability or Renault’s flair for modern engineering, both models present a compelling case for prospective SUV buyers in 2024.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Captur is only slightly cheaper – starting at 21,100 £ , while the Mitsubishi ASX costs 21,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 292 £.
Both cars consume an average of 4.4 L/100km – no difference here.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
Both models deliver identical power – 158 HP each.
Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 8.9 s from 0 to 100 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Captur delivers marginally more torque with 265 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is barely lighter – 1,296 kg compared to 1,323 kg. The difference is around 27 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers a bit more boot space – 484 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 62 L.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Captur carries very slightly more – 453 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 8 kg.
The Mitsubishi ASX is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Captur is a cheeky little crossover that pairs city-friendly agility with a roomy, well-thought-out cabin and enough style to turn heads at the lights. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want practical versatility and a dash of personality on their daily drives, without taking itself too seriously.
details
The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,100 - 28,400 £
|
Price
21,400 - 32,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
co2
99 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,323 - 1,441 kg
|
Curb weight
1,296 - 1,493 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
|
|
Length
4,239 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
|
Height
1,575 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,363 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
447 - 453 kg
|
Payload
397 - 445 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España