Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Renault Captur - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 21100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Renault Captur?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Captur has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21100 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3643 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Captur manages with 4.40 L and is therefore evident more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.
Captur
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a minimal edge – offering 168 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 10 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Renault Captur takes 8.90 s. That’s about 1.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs to a small extent better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Renault Captur tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls minimal stronger with 290 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is minimal lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1323 kg. The difference is around 7 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers slightly more room – 523 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 101 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Renault Captur performs minimal better – up to 1363 L, which is about 80 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma barely noticeable takes the win – 469 kg compared to 453 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Ford Puma proves to be leads convincingly overall and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Puma is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Renault Captur
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Renault Captur
5 (3 Reviews)
The Renault Captur is a cheeky little crossover that pairs city-friendly agility with a roomy, well-thought-out cabin and enough style to turn heads at the lights. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want practical versatility and a dash of personality on their daily drives, without taking itself too seriously.
details
Ford Puma
Renault Captur
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
21100 - 28400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1323 - 1441 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4239 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1797 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1575 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1363 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
447 - 453 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.