Compare performance (158 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (17,100 £ vs 23,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Clio or Honda Jazz?
In the world of compact hatchbacks, the Honda Jazz and Renault Clio stand out as formidable rivals, each offering a distinctive blend of practicality, performance, and technology. This comparison delves into the attributes of both models, focusing on their technical aspects and innovations that may appeal to potential buyers.
The Honda Jazz, powered by a 1.5-litre full hybrid engine, produces a commendable 122 HP with 253 Nm of torque. Paired with a continuously variable transmission (CVT), it offers smooth acceleration from 0-100 km/h in approximately 9.6 seconds. On the other hand, the Renault Clio presents a more varied lineup, boasting a top-of-the-range 1.6-litre full hybrid engine that generates 143 HP and 205 Nm of torque. This setup allows it to accelerate from 0-100 km/h in an impressive 9.3 seconds.
When it comes to fuel economy, the Honda Jazz shines with consumption rated between 4.5 to 4.8 L/100 km, making it a standout in terms of eco-friendliness with CO2 emissions ranging from 102 to 108 g/km. The Renault Clio, while competitive, offers a broader range of options with a fuel consumption that varies from 4.3 L/100 km for the hybrid to 7.0 L/100 km for the more powerful petrol variants. Its CO2 emissions stretch from 97 g/km to 130 g/km, showcasing the options available for eco-conscious drivers.
Both models are designed with functionality in mind. The Honda Jazz measures 4089 mm in length and 1526 mm in height, offering a trunk capacity of 304 liters, which is sufficient for everyday needs. The Clio, slightly shorter at 4053 mm and lower at 1440 mm, compensates with a larger trunk capacity of 391 liters for its more spacious hatchback design. Both cars comfortably seat five, catering to urban families and city commuters alike.
Inside, the Honda Jazz impresses with its spaciousness and practicality. The ‘Magic Seat’ system provides immense flexibility for cargo arrangements, making it a champion of the compact class. It also features a user-friendly infotainment system with modern connectivity options. The Renault Clio, known for its stylish interior, incorporates a more upscale feel with quality materials, an intuitive 7 to 9.3-inch touchscreen, and a digital cockpit that enhances the driving experience.
Both vehicles are equipped with a suite of advanced safety features. The Honda Jazz comes with Honda Sensing technology, which includes collision mitigation braking, adaptive cruise control, and lane-keeping assistance. Conversely, the Renault Clio does not fall short, boasting Renault's Easy Drive package with features like traffic sign recognition, emergency braking, and more, enhancing its standing in safety ratings.
Honda's focus on hybrid technology in the Jazz demonstrates a commitment to sustainability, while the Clio showcases a more diverse engine lineup, including LPG variants, catering to diverse driver needs. Both manufacturers have prioritised tech advancements—wireless smartphone connections, voice recognition, and connectivity options like Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are available in both vehicles, appealing to the tech-savvy consumer.
Ultimately, the choice between the Honda Jazz and Renault Clio will depend on individual priorities. If you value hybrid efficiency, spaciousness, and innovative utility features, the Jazz is an excellent choice. Conversely, if you seek a stylish hatchback with multiple engine options and modern tech features, the Clio might be the more appealing option. Both vehicles present strong cases in their respective categories, making them worthy contenders in the ever-competitive compact hatchback market.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Clio is markedly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Honda Jazz costs 23,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,043 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Honda Jazz with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio offers clearly more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Clio is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Honda Jazz takes 9.4 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Honda Jazz delivers noticeably more torque with 253 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 63 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is barely lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 1,302 kg. The difference is around 100 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Clio offers marginally more boot space – 327 L compared to 304 L. That’s a difference of about 23 L.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries a bit more – 463 kg compared to 388 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.
The Renault Clio is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.
details
The Honda Jazz is a supremely practical small hatch that hides clever packaging and more usable space than it lets on, with friendly styling and an unfussy charm. It’s economical to run, easy to park and perfect for buyers who want reliable, versatile daily motoring without the hassle.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
|
Price
23,100 - 26,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
92 - 115 g/km
|
co2
102 - 108 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
|
Curb weight
1,302 - 1,321 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
|
Trunk capacity
304 L
|
|
Length
4,116 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,768 mm
|
Width
-
|
|
Height
1,451 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,094 - 1,176 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
453 - 463 kg
|
Payload
369 - 388 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
190 Nm
|
Torque
253 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,026
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Honda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España