VS

Renault Clio vs smart #3 comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (17,100 £ vs 42,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Clio or smart #3?

Renault Clio vs smart #3: Key differences

Renault Clio

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably lighter
details

smart #3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Clio

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Clio is clearly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the smart #3 costs 42,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 24,934 £.

#3

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the smart #3 offers considerably more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 114 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #3 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.3 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the smart #3 delivers substantially more torque with 384 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 194 Nm more.

Clio

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is considerably lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 1,810 kg. The difference is around 608 kg.

Looking at boot space, the smart #3 offers somewhat more boot space – 370 L compared to 327 L. That’s a difference of about 43 L.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries very slightly more – 463 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 13 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The smart #3 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

£41,991
#3

smart #3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 272 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 455 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Opel Corsa
Renault Clio
VS
The Vauxhall Corsa and the Renault Clio are two of the UK’s most popular superminis, each offering a different blend of driving feel, practicality and everyday refinement. This comparison will focus on their driving dynamics, interior quality, running costs and practicality to help you decide which …
Renault Clio
smart #3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Clio

The Renault Clio is a smartly styled and practical compact hatch that feels at home in city traffic while offering a surprisingly refined ride. It pairs user-friendly tech and a comfortable interior with a reputation for being economical and easy to live with.

details
r212202p
r212188p
r212211p

Reviews Renault Clio

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
technoman
31 Mar 2026, 08:36:27

Having owned a clio now for the last 8 years we have found the 0.9ltr engine to work well both around town and on motorways . Averaging around 45mpg on mixed driving. The 3 cylinder engine has no cambelt to worry about . Interior has worked and worn well . No defects at all during owner ship BUT the striking red paintwork (metallic) is showing deterioration and is expensive to put right and this would be the only reason for dropping a star off the rating . There are two main services on the car an A and a B service. All they do on the A service is change the cabin filter and do the usual safety checks which costa around £120 the second B service is oil and filter change around £230 but at 36000 miles need air filter and brake fluid change which can add another £120

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

smart #3

The Smart #3 turns the brand's cheeky city-car attitude into a grown-up compact SUV, pairing sleek styling with a surprisingly roomy, well-made interior. It's a brilliant pick for buyers who want electric ease without dullness — practical enough for daily life, but still lively enough to make parking and grocery runs feel a little fun.

details
smart-hashtag3-brabus-photon-orange-exterior-mallorca1
smart-hashtag3-brabus-photon-orange-exterior-mallorca13
smart-hashtag3-brabus-photon-orange-exterior-mallorca21
smart-hashtag3-brabus-photon-orange-interior-mallorca10
smart-hashtag3-brabus-photon-orange-interior-mallorca3
smart-hashtag3-premium-ceramic-cream-interior-mallorca7

Reviews smart #3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ronny
16 Oct 2025, 13:10:59

Handsome design, packed with advanced driver‑assist technology and stellar performance — all at an attractive price. Highly recommended, this car!

Frequently compared as well

Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
City supermini buyers face a tasty dilemma: the Citroën C3 charms with cosy ride comfort, playful looks and practical flair, while the Renault Clio answers with sharper handling, a more premium cabin and smarter tech. Choose the C3 if you prioritise comfort and personality; pick the Clio if you …
Fiat Panda
Renault Clio
VS
The Fiat Panda and Renault Clio are popular small cars that take very different approaches: the Panda focuses on practicality, rugged simplicity and roomy packaging for its size, while the Clio offers sharper styling, more refined driving and a tech-forward cabin. If you want easy ownership and …
Hyundai i20
Renault Clio
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai i20 and the Renault Clio means weighing practical space and proven reliability against a more stylish, comfort-focused hatch. I'll compare their driving dynamics, interior quality, equipment and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your everyday life.
Peugeot 208
Renault Clio
VS
The Peugeot 208 and Renault Clio are two of Europe’s leading superminis, each blending attractive design, efficient engines, and practical dimensions for everyday driving. This short comparison will highlight their key differences in styling, cabin quality, driving dynamics, tech and running costs …
Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
smart #3
smart #5
VS
smart #3 and smart #5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the smart #3 or the smart #5 is the …
Dacia Sandero
Renault Clio
VS
In the highly competitive subcompact segment, the Dacia Sandero and Renault Clio present distinct offerings tailored to budget-conscious buyers. While the Sandero boasts an impressive value proposition with its spacious interior and practicality, the Clio shines with its refined styling and …
Ford Puma
Renault Clio
VS
The Ford Puma and Renault Clio are two popular compact choices that blend city-friendly dimensions with striking style, yet they adopt different priorities in driving character and practicality. The Puma leans toward a higher-riding, crossover feel with clever boot and storage solutions, while the …
Renault Clio
smart #3

Costs and Consumption
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Price
42,000 £
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
455 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
92 - 118 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Curb weight
1,810 kg
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Trunk capacity
370 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,768 mm
Width
1,844 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
453 - 463 kg
Payload
450 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
190 Nm
Torque
384 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
200 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Renault
Brand
smart
What drivetrain options does the Renault Clio have?

The Renault Clio is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.