@ Renault Group Media
@ Volvo Cars
VS

Renault Clio vs Volvo XC40 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (158 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (16600 £ vs 36800 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Clio or Volvo XC40?

Renault Clio

Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Clio @ Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Clio has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 16600 £, while the Volvo XC40 costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 20177 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Clio manages with 4.10 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 2.40 L per 100 km.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC40 has a to a small extent edge – offering 197 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 39 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC40 is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the performs better – reaching , while the tops out at . The difference is around .

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC40 pulls evident stronger with 300 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 95 Nm difference.

Clio @ Renault Group Media

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Renault Clio is clearly lighter – 1124 kg compared to 1688 kg. The difference is around 564 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC40 offers to a small extent more room – 452 L compared to 391 L. That’s a difference of about 61 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC40 performs somewhat better – up to 1328 L, which is about 152 L more than the Renault Clio.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 slightly takes the win – 532 kg compared to 463 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Renault Clio proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Renault Clio is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £16,600
Clio @ Renault Group Media

Renault Clio

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 67 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.1 - 5.3 L
details
Renault Clio
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Clio

The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.

details
r212202p @ Renault Group Media
r212188p @ Renault Group Media
r212211p @ Renault Group Media

Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal @ Volvo Cars
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl @ Volvo Cars

Reviews Renault Clio

Reviews Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Renault Clio
Volvo XC40
Clio @ Renault Group Media
XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
16600 - 23700 £
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.3 L
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
92 - 121 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1124 - 1331 kg
Curb weight
1688 kg
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4053 - 4116 mm
Length
4425 mm
Width
1768 - 1798 mm
Width
1863 mm
Height
1440 - 1451 mm
Height
1652 mm
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1176 L
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Payload
398 - 463 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
67 - 158 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 17.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
95 - 205 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
49 - 116 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1789 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2023 - 2026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Renault
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EX40
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Austral
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive realm of compact SUVs, the Renault Austral and the Volvo XC40 each offer distinct attributes catering to different customer desires. The Renault Austral emphasizes affordability and efficient urban maneuverability, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers seeking practicality. …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the battle of sportiness and practicality, the CUPRA Formentor and Volvo XC40 present compelling choices for discerning drivers. The Formentor's dynamic styling and performance-oriented features exude a sense of excitement, while the XC40 offers a more refined and spacious interior paired with a …
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
Dacia Sandero
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Clio
VS
In the highly competitive subcompact segment, the Dacia Sandero and Renault Clio present distinct offerings tailored to budget-conscious buyers. While the Sandero boasts an impressive value proposition with its spacious interior and practicality, the Clio shines with its refined styling and …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty styling and performance-oriented features, appealing to driving enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 offers a more refined interior and a strong emphasis on safety, making it an ideal choice for families. Both …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai i10
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Clio
VS
In the competitive realm of compact cars, the Hyundai i10 stands out with its impressive maneuverability and surprising interior space, making it an ideal choice for urban drivers. Meanwhile, the Renault Clio captivates with its stylish design and advanced technology features, offering a more …
Is the Renault Clio offered with different drivetrains?

The Renault Clio is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.