Compare performance (170 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (38,600 £ vs 67,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Master Transporter or Ford Transit Transporter?
In the bustling world of cargo vans, the Ford Transit and Renault Master are titans, each bringing their unique blend of engineering and innovation to the table. As the debate rages on over which transporter reigns supreme, let's delve into the technical aspects and recent innovations of these two impressive vehicles.
The Ford Transit offers a versatile engine lineup, featuring both diesel and electric options. With horsepower ranging from 105 to 269, the Transit is equipped to handle various demands. The diesel engines come with either a manual or automatic gearbox, while the electric variant boasts a reduction gearbox. For the eco-conscious, the Transit’s electric range reaches up to 317 km, powered by a 68 kWh battery. Torque is a strong point for Transit, offering between 310 and 430 Nm across its range.
Not to be outdone, the Renault Master matches the Transit with its own versatile engine choices. It offers diesel engines delivering between 105 and 180 HP, alongside an all-electric option. The Master’s top electric range hits 409 km, setting a high bar in the segment. Transmission options include both manual and automated manual gearboxes, providing a smooth driving experience. Torque stands robust as well, ranging from 245 to 400 Nm.
For fuel consumption, the Ford Transit offers competitive figures, with diesel variants consuming between 7.9 to 10.3 L/100km and electric consumption ranging from 21.3 to 32 kWh/100km. The Transit further offers an eco-friendly edge with its CO2 efficiency class ranging from A to G, reflecting its commitment to lower emissions.
The Renault Master shows its strengths in fuel efficiency as well. Diesel options have a consumption of 7.4 to 13.7 L/100km, and its electric variant ranges from 25.1 to 31 kWh/100km. Its CO2 efficiency classifications vary but include top scores, emphasizing Renault's push towards sustainability.
The Ford Transit measures a range of lengths from 5531 mm to 6704 mm, a width of 2059 mm, and height variations between 2530 mm and 2778 mm. This provides ample room for cargo and passengers, especially with payload capacities hitting up to 2607 kg.
The Renault Master slightly edges out in dimensions, boasting lengths from 5075 mm to 6875 mm. Its width spans up to 2080 mm with heights reaching 2808 mm. The Master supports substantial payloads as well, offering capacities exceeding 2000 kg in select models.
Both vehicles integrate innovations that advance comfort and utility for drivers and passengers. The Ford Transit comes with numerous seating configurations, offering 3 to 6 seats, tailored for varied business needs. The introduction of an all-wheel drive variant adds an extra level of adaptability on challenging road surfaces.
The Renault Master capitalizes on its spacious design, supporting configurations with up to 7 seats. Its modern touch includes advancements in automated manual transmissions and impressive acceleration metrics within its electric models, showcasing versatility.
Choosing between the Ford Transit and Renault Master depends largely on specific needs, whether it's maximum cargo space, superior electric range, or engine power. The Transit shines with its versatile configurations and robust eco-friendly technology, while the Master excels in range and spacious designs. Both models deliver innovations that keep them competitive in the ever-evolving transporter market, promising reliability, efficiency, and performance.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Master Transporter is considerably cheaper – starting at 38,600 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 28,662 £.
As for electric range, the Renault Master Transporter offers a bit more range – reaching up to 448 km, about 46 km more than the Ford Transit Transporter.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers noticeably more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 99 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers a bit more torque with 430 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 6 people.
The Ford Transit Transporter is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Master is a pragmatic workhorse that swallows cargo with an unbothered grin, offering clever practicality and load-friendly packaging for tradespeople and fleet buyers. It won’t excite like a sports car, but it steers predictably, runs economically and gets the job done day after day — like a reliable colleague who never calls in sick.
details
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,600 - 55,400 £
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
22.7 - 22.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
445 - 448 km
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 203 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,128 - 2,461 kg
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,080 mm
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
1,078 - 1,846 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Ford
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España