VS

Renault R5 vs KGM Musso EV comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 414 HP), boot space and price (24,000 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault R5 or KGM Musso EV?

Renault R5 vs KGM Musso EV: Key differences

Renault R5

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

KGM Musso EV

  • substantially more power
  • marginally more electric range
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

R5

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault R5 is significantly cheaper – starting at 24,000 £ , while the KGM Musso EV costs 36,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,991 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Renault R5 is significantly more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 23 kWh/100km for the KGM Musso EV. That’s a difference of about 8.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the KGM Musso EV offers marginally more range – reaching up to 420 km, about 15 km more than the Renault R5.

Musso EV

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the KGM Musso EV offers substantially more power – delivering 414 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 264 HP more horsepower.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 8 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the KGM Musso EV delivers significantly more torque with 678 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 433 Nm more.

R5

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault R5 is clearly lighter – 1,447 kg compared to 2,165 kg. The difference is around 718 kg.

When it comes to payload, the KGM Musso EV carries considerably more – 905 kg compared to 418 kg. That’s a difference of about 487 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The KGM Musso EV stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,000
Musso EV

KGM Musso EV

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 207 - 414 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 23 - 26 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 379 - 420 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault R5
VW ID.3
VS
Choosing between the retro-inspired Renault 5 and the practical VW ID.3 comes down to whether you value character and compact city agility or proven electric range and grown-up practicality. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show where each car shines and which one fits different kinds …
Renault R5
CUPRA Raval
VS
The Renault R5 and the CUPRA Raval represent two very different takes on the compact electric car — the Renault R5 leans on retro charm and urban practicality, while the CUPRA Raval emphasizes sporty dynamics and bold design. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they stack up on …
Renault R5
KGM Musso EV

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault R5

The Renault 5 blends classic styling cues with contemporary design, giving it a playful and characterful presence on the road. It’s a city-focused hatchback that feels nimble and cleverly packaged, ideal for drivers who want personality and practicality.

details
D9BB3E56-4B0D-4E48-A734-11A1714B92A5
79A3C149-BC71-4BE3-A149-986DD84D251C
DDEACB99-545B-4C72-B12C-AB35E7B77365

Reviews Renault R5

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
Petra
7 Aug 2026, 14:01:03

B
Impressed. Very good seats, super easy to use (self-explanatory), very brisk with great suspension. Sticks to the road even in the tightest corners.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Walter
4 Nov 2025, 21:42:46

Practical, nimble, and fun to drive. For rather small drivers up to 1.75 m there's plenty of space even on the back seat. Useful driver-assist systems, and Android Auto works well. Very economical in summer. In winter a lot of energy is used in the first five minutes to bring the battery up to 20°C, which makes consumption on short winter trips very high.

KGM Musso EV

The Musso EV blends pickup practicality with an electric drivetrain, delivering quiet performance and a roomy, well-equipped cabin that suits both work and everyday use. Its robust design and straightforward controls make it a compelling choice for buyers who want a capable utility vehicle with cleaner operation.

details
serpimg_XBhXgy

Reviews KGM Musso EV

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Renault R5
Kia EV2
VS
The Renault 5 and the Kia EV2 represent two different takes on the compact electric — the Renault 5 leans on retro styling and urban agility, while the Kia EV2 focuses on modern practicality and value. This comparison will help you decide between personality and usable space by looking at range, …
Renault R5
VW ID.Polo
VS
This short comparison pits the Renault 5 against the Volkswagen ID. Polo to help you choose which compact electric suits your needs. We'll focus on design, range, practicality, driving feel and ownership costs so you can pick the right city car.
CUPRA Born
Renault R5
VS
The CUPRA Born feels grown-up and focused — a proper hot‑hatch–inspired EV with genuine pace, sensible range and more practical space than its looks suggest, while the Renault 5 is a cheeky, retro‑flavoured city car built to charm tight streets rather than scorch the autobahn. Choose the Born if …
Renault R5
Renault Twingo
VS
Deciding between the Renault 5 and the Renault Twingo comes down to whether you prefer the retro-inspired style and modern reinterpretation of the 5 or the Twingo’s proven compact practicality. This comparison focuses on driving character, interior space, running costs and everyday usability to …
Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Renault R5
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Renault 5 is a retro‑inspired, city‑focused electric hatch that prioritizes style and zippy urban range; the Toyota Yaris is a compact, practical hatch offered with proven hybrid efficiency, everyday usability and mature safety tech. Pick the Renault 5 if you want charismatic design and a …
MG MG4
Renault R5
VS
In the realm of electric hatchbacks, the MG4 and Renault R5 present compelling options for eco-conscious drivers. The MG4 impresses with its spacious interior and robust range, making it suitable for both city commuting and longer journeys. Meanwhile, the Renault R5 captivates with its …
Renault R5
KGM Musso EV

Costs and Consumption
Price
24,000 - 27,000 £
Price
36,000 - 45,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 15.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
23 - 26 kWh/100km
Electric Range
307 - 405 km
Electric Range
379 - 420 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Pickup
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,447 - 1,524 kg
Curb weight
2,165 - 2,285 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,744 mm
Width
1,920 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
396 - 418 kg
Payload
805 - 905 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
122 - 150 HP
Power HP
207 - 414 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
225 - 245 Nm
Torque
339 - 678 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
90 - 110 kW
Power kW
152 - 304 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Renault
Brand
KGM
What drivetrain options does the Renault R5 have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.