Compare performance (158 HP vs 138 HP), boot space and price (24,400 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Symbioz or Kia Niro?
In the competitive automotive market, SUVs are rapidly gaining popularity. In this article, we will compare two significant contenders in the hybrid segment: the Kia Niro and the Renault Symbioz. Both vehicles offer eco-friendly technology without compromising performance, making them ideal choices for environmentally conscious buyers. Let’s delve into their technical specifications, innovations, and overall driving experience.
Both the Kia Niro and Renault Symbioz boast a contemporary SUV design with sleek lines and functional dimensions. The Niro measures 4420 mm in length, 1825 mm in width, and 1545 mm in height, providing a spacious cabin and ample storage with a trunk capacity of 451 liters.
On the other hand, the Symbioz is slightly shorter at 4413 mm, with a width of 1797 mm and a height of 1575 mm. Despite its compact size, it offers a generous trunk space of 492 liters, slightly more than that of the Niro. This advantage makes the Symbioz a practical option for families or those needing extra cargo space.
The Kia Niro comes with two hybrid powertrain options: a Full Hybrid and a Plug-in Hybrid, delivering a power output of 129 HP and 171 HP, respectively. The 1.6-liter engine offers a torque of 265 Nm and accelerates from 0-100 km/h in 11.3 seconds for the Full Hybrid variant, while the Plug-in Hybrid achieves it in just 10.4 seconds.
In comparison, the Renault Symbioz features a Full Hybrid engine producing 143 HP and a torque of 250 Nm. It also has a 0-100 km/h acceleration time of 10.6 seconds, making it competitive in performance. While both vehicles are equipped with automatic transmissions, the Niro utilizes a dual-clutch setup that enhances driving efficiency and responsiveness.
The pursuit of efficiency is pivotal in hybrid vehicles. The Kia Niro stands out with its excellent fuel consumption of as low as 4.4 L/100 km for the Full Hybrid variant and 0.8 L/100 km when considering its electric range of 65 km. In terms of emissions, the Niro excels with CO2 figures starting at 100 g/km, showcasing its commitment to a greener planet.
The Renault Symbioz, while still efficient, has a slightly higher fuel consumption of 4.8 L/100 km, which may be a consideration for the eco-conscious driver. Its emissions are rated at 109 g/km. Both vehicles fall within the CO2 efficiency class C, but the Niro maintains a slight advantage in sustainability.
Inside, the Kia Niro offers a modern, user-friendly infotainment system with an emphasis on connectivity and convenience. It is designed to accommodate five passengers comfortably, which adds to its appeal as a family vehicle.
The Renault Symbioz, also seating five, integrates cutting-edge technology, including advanced driver-assistance systems that enhance safety and ease of driving. Both vehicles feature high-quality materials and a blend of comfort and practicality, ensuring an enjoyable ride for all passengers.
The decision between the Kia Niro and Renault Symbioz ultimately comes down to personal preferences. The Niro impresses with its fuel efficiency, electric range, and greater power options, making it a versatile choice for a wide array of drivers. The Symbioz, however, captivates with its innovative technology, spacious interior, and slightly better trunk capacity.
Regardless of choice, both the Kia Niro and Renault Symbioz represent significant strides forward in the hybrid SUV market, catering to environmentally conscious consumers who seek a blend of performance, technology, and practicality. Whether you prioritize efficiency over luxury or vice versa, both vehicles promise to meet modern demands for sustainability in style.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Symbioz is somewhat cheaper – starting at 24,400 £ , while the Kia Niro costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,706 £.
Both cars consume an average of 4.5 L/100km – no difference here.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Symbioz offers slightly more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 138 HP. That’s roughly 20 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Symbioz is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 9.1 s, while the Kia Niro takes 11.1 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.
Both models offer the same torque – 265 Nm.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Symbioz is barely lighter – 1,359 kg compared to 1,474 kg. The difference is around 115 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Kia Niro carries barely more – 466 kg compared to 459 kg. That’s a difference of about 7 kg.
The Renault Symbioz is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Symbioz feels less like a traditional car and more like a rolling living room that's been told it's allowed to drive — its flowing lines and minimalist cabin are pure concept-car theatre that teases the future of everyday transport. For buyers with an eye for design and a taste for tech-forward ideas, the Symbioz is an alluring vision of what Renault could offer tomorrow, even if it's not yet a model you can park in your driveway.
details
The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24,400 - 30,700 £
|
Price
29,100 - 33,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 136 g/km
|
co2
102 - 111 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,359 - 1,465 kg
|
Curb weight
1,474 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
492 - 576 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,413 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
|
Height
1,575 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,682 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
455 - 459 kg
|
Payload
466 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
138 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 11 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 11.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
102 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,580 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Kia
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España