VS

Renault Symbioz vs Toyota C-HR comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 223 HP), boot space and price (24,700 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Symbioz or Toyota C-HR?

Renault Symbioz vs Toyota C-HR: Key differences

Renault Symbioz

4.8 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • slightly lighter
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

Toyota C-HR

4.8 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Symbioz

Renault Symbioz vs Toyota C-HR — quick orientation

The Renault Symbioz and the Toyota C-HR sit in the same compact crossover space but aim at different priorities: the Symbioz sells everyday efficiency and usable flexibility, while the C-HR pushes design, perceived quality and hybrid efficiency credentials. In short: Renault Symbioz vs Toyota C-HR is a clash of pragmatic packaging against a more image-led, tech‑forward package. Renault leans toward low running costs and family practicality, with features that make daily loading and long commutes easier. Toyota leans toward a sharper presence, a more composed chassis feel and hybrid variants that appeal to commuters and company-car buyers. Read on for how those philosophies play out in steering, comfort, practicality, cabin feel and ultimately which buyer each car suits best.

C-HR

Character and driving dynamics

The Renault Symbioz feels relaxed and composed, tuned for low-stress cruising rather than sporty engagement; its steering is light and confidence‑oriented, which makes urban manoeuvres effortless but leaves enthusiasts wanting feedback. The Toyota C-HR is the firmer, more assured partner on twisty roads, with a more tactile steering and body control that rewards precise inputs even if it never pretends to be a hot hatch. When it comes to punch and passing, the C-HR’s drivetrain offers brisker responses, while the Symbioz favours smoothness and fuel-saving gentleness — so overtakes feel more urgent in the Toyota. If you prefer an unruffled, almost floaty everyday commute pick the Symbioz; if you want a crossover that drives with a bit more intent and reassurance, the C-HR is the natural choice.

Symbioz

Comfort and long-distance behavior

On motorways the Renault Symbioz quietly eats miles — its cabin is hushed at cruising speeds and the relaxed setup makes long hauls less tiring, though rough city bumps can be felt more sharply on large wheels. The Toyota C-HR is equally comfortable over distance but trades a touch of serenity for firmer control; it stays planted and composed, though heavy throttle inputs bring a pronounced drivetrain note. Both cars are suitable for long trips, but the Symbioz leans toward a softer, more restful experience while the C-HR delivers a tauter, confidence‑inspiring ride that can feel less plush over abrupt imperfections. Choose the Symbioz if low noise and relaxed cruising are priorities, choose the C-HR if you want steadier handling and a feel of solidity on fast roads.

C-HR

Usability and practicality for daily life

Practicality is where the Renault Symbioz makes its strongest case: a sliding rear bench and a more generous, practically shaped loadspace make everyday chores and weekend luggage changes easier to manage. The Toyota C-HR sacrifices some of that usability for its shape — rear headroom and boot access are more compromised and the cargo area is less straightforward to pack, particularly in hybrid variants that eat into usable space. For families or anyone who frequently moves bulky items the Symbioz’s flexible layout will feel noticeably more useful; for singles or couples who prioritise style and don’t haul large loads regularly, the C-HR remains acceptable. Both are five‑seat cars on paper, but the Symbioz is the more forgiving companion when passengers and baggage vary day to day.

Symbioz

Cabin feel, technology and perceived quality

The Renault Symbioz trades some flash for clarity: its Google‑centric OpenR Link infotainment is intuitive and fast, and physical climate controls reduce distraction, yet materials and design read as functional rather than premium. The Toyota C-HR presents a crisper, more cohesive interior impression with smarter trim choices and a modern screen layout, although its habit of persistent warning chimes can feel intrusive in daily life. In use the Symbioz feels tech‑friendly and easygoing, while the C-HR feels a touch more refined and composed — the difference you notice most when you sit in each car for the first time. If convincing perceived quality matters to you, the C-HR has the edge; if logical, connected kit and fuss‑free operation are higher on the list, the Symbioz will please.

C-HR

Buyer fit and who should test-drive which

If you’re a cost‑conscious commuter or a family wanting the most usable interior for grocery runs and school runs, the Renault Symbioz aligns with that brief: lower running focus, sliding rear bench and an easygoing character that rewards relaxed driving. If you’re image‑conscious, want a tighter driving feel, or you’re a commuter who values hybrid tax/ev‑range benefits and a more premium cabin, the Toyota C-HR is the match to prioritise. Neither car is perfect for those who need maximum towing or three-across rear seats, so those buyers should look elsewhere, but both excel at opposite ends of the compact crossover remit. Use this editorial contrast to guide a short test loop: quiet motorway miles and luggage loading for the Symbioz, tighter urban handling and cabin polish for the C-HR, then dive into the technical comparison to see how the numbers back up these real‑world impressions.

Frequently compared as well

Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Choosing between the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross comes down to whether you prefer the C-HR’s sharper styling and firmer, more engaging ride or the Yaris Cross’s roomier practicality and better efficiency. I’ll compare their driving feel, interior comfort, fuel economy, and features to …
Renault Captur
Renault Symbioz
VS
Captur and Symbioz showcase two very different Renault directions: Captur is a practical compact crossover focused on everyday comfort, economy and usability, while Symbioz is a forward‑looking concept exploring electric power, autonomous driving and living‑space ideas. This short comparison will …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Symbioz

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Symbioz is slightly cheaper – starting at 24,700 £ , while the Toyota C-HR costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,449 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota C-HR uses 2.3 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Renault Symbioz with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 2.2 L/100km.

C-HR

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR offers noticeably more power – delivering 223 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 65 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Renault Symbioz takes 9.1 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.

Symbioz

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Symbioz is slightly lighter – 1,359 kg compared to 1,505 kg. The difference is around 146 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Renault Symbioz offers noticeably more boot space – 576 L compared to 447 L. That’s a difference of about 129 L.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Symbioz carries only slightly more – 459 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 34 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota C-HR is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £29,100
C-HR

Toyota C-HR

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 223 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range 66 km
details
Renault Symbioz
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Symbioz

The Renault Symbioz is a forward-looking concept car that imagines a seamless link between vehicle and home, pairing a lounge-like cabin with striking, futuristic styling. More idea than production plan, it showcases Renault's vision for connected, autonomous and sustainable mobility while provoking debate about how we will live and travel.

details
R-DAM_1579937
R-DAM_1580039
R-DAM_1579964

Reviews Renault Symbioz

4.8 (5 Reviews)
rate
PF
19 Feb 2026, 11:56:45

A delightful hybrid (family car). Roomy, quick (combined nearly 150 hp) and safe.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michael
5 Dec 2025, 23:17:28

I've been driving the Symbioz Full Hybrid with the iconic trim for 3,500 km. I test-drove both cars. I think the win goes to the Symbioz. Good quality at a family-friendly price. Unfortunately the Opel is simply too expensive. Strangely, what never really gets mentioned is that the Symbioz's suspension is absolutely superb.

Toyota C-HR

The Toyota C-HR is a bold, coupe-styled crossover that grabs attention with angular lines and a modern interior design. It’s aimed at comfortable urban driving and sensible efficiency, offering practical features and distinctive looks rather than rugged off-road ability.

details
64380-c-hr-grey-2020-25-web-lr
64412-c-hr-grey-2020-41-web-lr
64421-c-hr-grey-2020-32-web-lr
64409-c-hr-grey-2020-37-web-lr
64403-c-hr-grey-2020-52-web-lr

Reviews Toyota C-HR

4.8 (7 Reviews)
rate
Jan
16 May 2026, 20:51:01

Great driving comfort, admittedly short trips, but above all a cool impression.

Rav is for wimps.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Sam baba
25 Apr 2026, 21:54:02

Reliability and no maintenance costs, plus a futuristic design.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Renault Austral
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Austral and the Renault Symbioz represent two very different faces of Renault: the Austral is a production compact SUV focused on practicality and comfort, while the Symbioz is a concept show car that explores radical design and future technologies. Comparing them helps buyers choose …
Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Deciding between the Toyota C‑HR and the C‑HR+ is about whether you prefer the C‑HR’s balanced efficiency and bold styling or the C‑HR+’s higher trim level with extra equipment and refinement. I’ll compare performance, comfort, features and running costs to help you pick the one that best matches …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Corolla
VS
Choosing between the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Corolla comes down to whether you want a compact crossover's higher driving position and distinctive styling or a traditional compact car's practicality and efficiency. The C-HR emphasizes bold looks and a more SUV-like feel, while the Corolla …
Lexus LBX
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Lexus LBX and Toyota C-HR are compact crossovers with similar footprints but aimed at different buyers. The LBX prioritizes premium materials, a quieter ride and upscale features, while the C-HR emphasizes bold styling, engaging handling and stronger value for money.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
VS
Choosing between the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports comes down to whether you value the C-HR’s bold crossover styling and city-friendly agility or the Corolla Touring Sports’ practical estate space and relaxed long-distance comfort. This comparison will cover driving feel, …
Omoda 5
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Omoda 5 brings bold, modern styling and a tech-forward package, while the Toyota C‑HR emphasizes distinctive design, proven reliability and a refined hybrid powertrain. This comparison covers practicality, driving character, equipment and running costs to help you decide which compact crossover …
Lexus UX
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Lexus UX and Toyota C-HR are compact crossovers aimed at urban buyers who want agile packaging and distinctive style. The UX leans on Lexus-level refinement and a premium cabin, while the C-HR emphasizes bolder styling and strong value for money.
Renault Symbioz
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption
Price
24,700 - 31,100 £
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
66 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
102 - 136 g/km
co2
52 - 116 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,359 - 1,465 kg
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
Trunk capacity
492 - 576 L
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,797 mm
Width
1,832 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
455 - 459 kg
Payload
375 - 425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 11 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 265 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 116 kW
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Renault
Brand
Toyota
What drive types are available for the Renault Symbioz?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.