Compare performance (158 HP vs 428 HP), boot space and price (24,400 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Symbioz or Volvo EX30?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the ever-evolving automotive industry, the battle between electric and hybrid technology rages on. Today, we delve into a heated comparison between two forward-thinking models: the Renault Symbioz and the Volvo EX30. Both these vehicles are at the forefront of innovation, but they approach the future of driving in their unique ways.
The Renault Symbioz stands as a testament to hybrid engineering with its full hybrid engine type. It comes equipped with a 1.6-liter engine, producing 143 HP and 105 kW of power. This SUV's fuel consumption is commendable at 4.8 L/100 km, making it an efficient choice for eco-conscious drivers. The Symbioz manages an acceleration of 0-100 km/h in 10.6 seconds with a top speed of 170 km/h, powered by a compact 0.6 kWh battery offering a helpful boost when needed.
In contrast, the Volvo EX30 is a pure electromechanical marvel. The EX30 delivers an impressive range of power options, from 272 HP with 200 kW to a staggering 428 HP with 315 kW. It boasts electrifying acceleration options from 0-100 km/h in as little as 3.6 seconds. This electric vehicle offers different drive types, including both rear-wheel and all-wheel drive configurations.
The hybrid nature of the Renault Symbioz ensures a longer range between fuel stops, with a generous fuel tank capacity of 48 liters complementing its efficient engine. It's perfect for those who desire the blend of traditional and renewable power sources, with a CO2 emission of 109 g/km.
The Volvo EX30, with its zero-emissions electric engine, can reach an electric range between 339 km and 476 km depending on the model and driving conditions. Its battery capacity options range from 49 kWh to 65 kWh, emphasizing the brand’s commitment to sustainable motoring. This all translates to a CO2 efficiency class of A.
The Renault Symbioz is designed with practicality in mind. Its more sizable trunk space of 492 liters and a payload capacity of 427 kg makes it a versatile companion for family trips or hauling goods. The SUV stretches out to 4413 mm in length, 1797 mm in width, and 1575 mm in height, offering ample space for passengers and cargo alike.
While the Volvo EX30 focuses on compact efficiency with a length of 4233 mm, a width of 1837 mm, and an adjustable height between 1549 and 1567 mm. Its trunk space is relatively smaller at 318 liters, but the vehicle’s curb weight varies between 1840 kg to 1983 kg, hinting at structural robustness that Volvo is renowned for.
The Renault Symbioz leverages hybrid technology in a user-friendly way, combining a smooth automatic gearbox with a seamless driving experience, led by the forefront hybrid engineering of Renault.
Volvo, on the other hand, goes full throttle with its reduction gearbox for the EX30, simplifying power delivery while offering an engaging driving experience. The EX30 is indicative of Volvo’s pledge for an electrified future, providing drivers with sustainable yet exciting options.
Choosing between the Renault Symbioz and the Volvo EX30 depends largely on individual needs and preferences. The Symbioz shines for hybrid enthusiasts who crave long road trips with minimal environmental impact, while the EX30 appeals to those seeking cutting-edge electric performance. Either way, both vehicles pave the road for a greener tomorrow.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Renault Symbioz is clearly cheaper – starting at 24,400 £ , while the Volvo EX30 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,563 £.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX30 offers clearly more power – delivering 428 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 270 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX30 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the Renault Symbioz takes 9.1 s. That’s about 5.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX30 delivers clearly more torque with 543 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 278 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Symbioz is visibly lighter – 1,359 kg compared to 1,840 kg. The difference is around 481 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Symbioz carries a bit more – 459 kg compared to 390 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.
The Volvo EX30 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Symbioz feels less like a traditional car and more like a rolling living room that's been told it's allowed to drive — its flowing lines and minimalist cabin are pure concept-car theatre that teases the future of everyday transport. For buyers with an eye for design and a taste for tech-forward ideas, the Symbioz is an alluring vision of what Renault could offer tomorrow, even if it's not yet a model you can park in your driveway.
details
The Volvo EX30 arrives as a compact electric with crisp Scandinavian design and a cheeky personality, proving you can be serious about safety and still enjoy a grin on your commute. Its cabin is cleverly packaged and delightfully easy to live with, offering smart tech and practical touches that make it feel like a grown-up's city car with a sense of fun.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24,400 - 30,700 £
|
Price
30,000 - 47,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
339 - 475 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 136 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,359 - 1,465 kg
|
Curb weight
1,840 - 1,960 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
492 - 576 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,413 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
Width
1,838 mm
|
|
Height
1,575 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,682 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
455 - 459 kg
|
Payload
370 - 390 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 428 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 11 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
343 - 543 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
103 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 315 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España