VS

Renault Trafic Transporter vs Mitsubishi Colt comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (38,100 £ vs 18,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Trafic Transporter or Mitsubishi Colt?

Renault Trafic Transporter vs Mitsubishi Colt: Key differences

Renault Trafic Transporter

  • somewhat more power
details

Mitsubishi Colt

  • considerably cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially lighter
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Trafic Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mitsubishi Colt is considerably cheaper – starting at 18,200 £ , while the Renault Trafic Transporter costs 38,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19,935 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Colt uses 4.2 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Renault Trafic Transporter with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 2.6 L/100km.

Colt

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Trafic Transporter offers somewhat more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi Colt is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 9.3 s, while the Renault Trafic Transporter takes 10.8 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Trafic Transporter delivers substantially more torque with 380 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 220 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Renault Trafic Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is substantially lighter – 1,189 kg compared to 1,848 kg. The difference is around 659 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Trafic Transporter carries considerably more – 1,222 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 837 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Trafic Transporter holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,100
Trafic Transporter

Renault Trafic Transporter

  • Engine Type Electric, Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 122 - 170 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 6.8 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 21.2 - 22.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 240 - 318 km
Renault Trafic Transporter
Mitsubishi Colt

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Renault Trafic Transporter

The Renault Trafic is a practical, workhorse transporter that hides thoughtful cabin comfort behind a tough, utilitarian exterior, so you can tackle a busy week without sacrificing sanity. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want reliability and clever flexibility rather than flash, with just enough character to make daily hauling feel less like a chore.

details

Mitsubishi Colt

The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.

details
Renault Trafic Transporter
Mitsubishi Colt

Costs and Consumption

Price
38,100 - 43,500 £
Price
18,200 - 25,000 £
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 22.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
240 - 318 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 184 g/km
co2
96 - 119 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
3 - 6
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,848 - 2,075 kg
Curb weight
1,189 - 1,380 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Length
-
Length
4,053 mm
Width
1,956 mm
Width
1,798 mm
Height
-
Height
1,439 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1,069 L
Payload
899 - 1,222 kg
Payload
381 - 385 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
122 - 170 HP
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 - 13.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
174 km/h
Torque
245 - 380 Nm
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
90 - 125 kW
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3

General

Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Renault
Brand
Mitsubishi
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.