VS

Rolls-Royce Cullinan vs Dacia Sandero comparison

Compare performance (600 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (275,400 £ vs 11,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Rolls-Royce Cullinan or Dacia Sandero?

Rolls-Royce Cullinan vs Dacia Sandero: Key differences

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

  • clearly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

Dacia Sandero

3.6 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • significantly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Cullinan

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Dacia Sandero is considerably cheaper – starting at 11,000 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 264,438 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Dacia Sandero uses 5.3 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L/100km. The difference is about 10.7 L/100km.

Sandero

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers clearly more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 478 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Dacia Sandero takes 9.7 s. That’s about 4.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers considerably more torque with 900 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 700 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Dacia Sandero is significantly lighter – 1,100 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 1,560 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers markedly more boot space – 555 L compared to 372 L. That’s a difference of about 183 L.

When it comes to payload, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan carries significantly more – 840 kg compared to 436 kg. That’s a difference of about 404 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Dacia Sandero is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £11,000
Sandero

Dacia Sandero

  • Engine Type Petrol, LPG
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 67 - 122 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 7.2 L/100km
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Dacia Sandero

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.

details

Dacia Sandero

The Sandero is a no-nonsense hatchback that prioritises practicality and low running costs, making it a smart choice for budget-minded buyers. It delivers a surprisingly roomy interior and straightforward, useful equipment so you get everyday usability without paying for unnecessary frills.

details
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Dacia Sandero

Costs and Consumption

Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
Price
11,000 - 16,300 £
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 7.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
363 - 380 g/km
co2
111 - 131 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,660 kg
Curb weight
1,100 - 1,297 kg
Trunk capacity
555 L
Trunk capacity
328 - 372 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,000 mm
Width
1,853 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
840 kg
Payload
385 - 436 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, LPG
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
Power HP
67 - 122 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.7 - 16.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
Torque
95 - 200 Nm
Number of Cylinders
12
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
Power kW
49 - 90 kW
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,199 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Rolls-Royce
Brand
Dacia
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.