VS

SEAT Arona vs Ford Puma comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (20,700 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – SEAT Arona or Ford Puma?

SEAT Arona vs Ford Puma: Key differences

SEAT Arona

4.9 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • very slightly more efficient
  • moderately lighter
details

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more power
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Arona

Matchup at a glance

Ford Puma VS SEAT Arona set up a neat duel in the subcompact crossover ring, pitting the Puma’s sporty personality against the Arona’s sensible charm. If you’re searching for a comparison of two city-friendly crossovers, this is the page that frames their characters before the spreadsheets take over. The Puma presents itself as the cheeky, more extroverted option while the Arona trades bravado for a quietly practical package. Think of this as the soft intro to the fight — style, comfort and daily usability will decide the rounds rather than raw numbers.

Puma

Vibe and road personality

The Ford Puma leans into a sporty, playful vibe with sharper steering and a cabin that feels a touch more driver-focused, while the SEAT Arona wears understatement as its badge: calm, competent and easy to live with. On twisty roads the Puma wants to entertain, on town streets the Arona prefers to get you there with minimal fuss. Interior ambience follows the same script — the Puma aims for a slightly more premium, sporty feel; the Arona keeps things practical and straightforward. Both have their own kind of charm, but they aim it at different moods behind the wheel.

Arona

How they cope with everyday life

For daily commutes and school runs the SEAT Arona feels like the shoe that fits most days—simple ergonomics, sensible packaging and an easy driving position that removes stress. The Ford Puma makes mundane trips more enjoyable thanks to its livelier handling and a cabin that rewards a more engaged driver, so longer runs feel less like a chore. Both are compact enough for city parking yet offer enough adaptability for weekend shopping and escape plans, but the Arona nudges practicality while the Puma leans toward driver comfort. If real-world usability is your priority, watch how each one treats luggage, ingress/egress and rear-seat life rather than headline specs.

Puma

Buying with your ego in mind

Choose the Ford Puma if you want a car that says you enjoy driving and appreciate a flash of style without being ostentatious; it’s the one that makes you smile reversing into a café. Pick the SEAT Arona if your decision is quieter, more about ticking boxes: efficient, unshowy and hard to argue with when spreadsheets come out. The Puma is easier to justify when the drive itself is part of the appeal, while the Arona’s strengths are the sensible, everyday gains that add up over time. Neither is about bling for bling’s sake, but they sell very different kinds of satisfaction.

Arona

Who should test-drive the Puma first

If you’re more drawn to style, a cozier cockpit and a car that behaves like it enjoys cornering, the Ford Puma should be near the top of your test-drive list — ideal for style-conscious commuters and weekend drivers who value a bit of sparkle. Buyers who prize perceived quality and a slightly more engaging drive will find the Puma more emotionally satisfying than the Arona. That said, bring the SEAT Arona along for the comparison so you can feel the difference in everyday calm and ergonomics. Try both back-to-back: the contrast between playfulness and pragmatism is the point of this duel.

Puma

Who should prefer the Arona — and why you’ll still look back at the Puma

The SEAT Arona is aimed squarely at pragmatic buyers who want a compact crossover that behaves like a grown-up: economical, easy to live with and pleasantly unobtrusive, making it a great fit for budget-minded families and city-first drivers. Its sensible layout and approachable character suit anyone who values low fuss over theatrical flair, yet the Ford Puma will still turn heads when you park beside it. If you want reassurance and everyday logic, the Arona is the safe, steady pick; if you crave a touch of drama on your commute, that’s where the Puma re-enters the conversation. Read on for the detailed numbers if you want to turn these impressions into an exact shopping shortlist.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
SEAT Arona
VS
The Renault Captur and SEAT Arona are two of Europe’s most popular compact crossovers, each offering a city-friendly footprint with raised driving position and SUV styling. This short comparison focuses on practicality, driving character, running costs and feature value to help you pick the one …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Cross
VS
The SEAT Arona and the VW T-Cross are closely matched compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want city-friendly dimensions, practical interiors and a touch of SUV style. This comparison focuses on space, fuel economy, driving feel, safety and running costs to help you decide which suits your …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Arona

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

SEAT Arona is a bit cheaper – starting at 20,700 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,214 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the SEAT Arona uses 5.3 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

Puma

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers a bit more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the SEAT Arona takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers somewhat more torque with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm more.

Arona

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, SEAT Arona is moderately lighter – 1,188 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 128 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers noticeably more boot space – 523 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 123 L.

When it comes to payload, the SEAT Arona carries somewhat more – 522 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 53 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
details
SEAT Arona
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

SEAT Arona

The SEAT Arona is a compact crossover that blends practical, city-friendly packaging with a sporty, youthful design. It delivers a comfortable ride, an intuitive cabin and economical running costs, making it a sensible pick for daily drives and weekend getaways.

details
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_07_HQ
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_06_HQ
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_04_HQ
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_02_HQ

Reviews SEAT Arona

4.9 (4 Reviews)
rate
Jorge Soares
29 May 2026, 20:19:35

É um excelente crossover...
Tem uma imagem desportiva e está bem equipado a nível de segurança e de tecnologia...
Tem uma óptima posição de condução...
É muito divertido de conduzir...
Só tenho pena de não trazer de fábrica o pneu sobresselente...

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Jorge Soares
26 Mar 2026, 01:31:22

Comprei há 2 meses o Seat Arona novo DE 95 cv... ´Trata-se da versão base...
Estou muito contente com o mesmo...
Tem um ótima posição elevada da condução, é económico, tem uma bagageira com uma boa capacidade de arrumação...
Considero que este B Suv tem uma aparência bem desportiva e atraente...
Só tenho pena deste carro não ter instalados de fábrica os faróis dianteiros de nevoeiro, nem a câmara de ré acho que isto faz muita falta a nível da segurança da condução... Só a versão superior do carro é que traz instalada isto tudo...

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

SEAT Arona
VW Taigo
VS
The SEAT Arona is the zesty city crossover that trades bravado for practicality, while the VW Taigo dresses up the same bones with a sleeker, coupé-like roofline — pick Arona for everyday sense and Taigo if style tops your shopping list. Both share VW Group underpinnings and efficient engines, so …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Roc
VS
Sibling rivalry in compact-SUV clothing: the SEAT Arona and VW T‑Roc go head-to-head — one brings Spanish spice and value, the other German polish and refinement. We’ll compare driving feel, practicality, tech and running costs so you can pick the compact crossover that deserves a spot in your …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
Kia EV2
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia EV2 represent two different approaches in the compact crossover class: the Puma delivers engaging handling, practical packaging and petrol/hybrid options, while the EV2 is a clean-sheet electric aimed at low running costs, range and modern tech. Choose the Puma if driving …
SEAT Arona
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Picking between the SEAT Arona and the Skoda Kamiq is largely a choice between a sportier, style-led crossover and a more practical, spacious, value-focused one. Both share similar underpinnings and efficient engines, but the Arona leans toward engaging looks and driving feel while the Kamiq …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona are two of the most popular compact crossovers, combining practical interiors, elevated driving positions and city-friendly footprints. Choosing between the Puma’s engaging handling and efficient mild-hybrid options and the Kona’s broader engine range and tech-rich …
SEAT Arona
SEAT Ibiza
VS
Think of the SEAT Arona as the chunky crossover that gives you a higher view of the road, more boot space and practical family-friendly packaging, while the SEAT Ibiza is the sharper, lighter hatch that’s more fun to hustle through town and returns better fuel economy. Pick the Arona if you want …
SEAT Arona
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
Price
20,700 - 30,300 £
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
120 - 132 g/km
co2
0 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,188 - 1,268 kg
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Trunk capacity
400 L
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,780 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
502 - 522 kg
Payload
367 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 11.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
Brand
SEAT
Brand
Ford
What drivetrain options does the SEAT Arona have?

The SEAT Arona is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.