VS

SEAT Ateca vs KGM Musso EV comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 414 HP), boot space and price (25,100 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – SEAT Ateca or KGM Musso EV?

SEAT Ateca vs KGM Musso EV: Key differences

SEAT Ateca

4.5 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

KGM Musso EV

  • substantially more power
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ateca

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

SEAT Ateca is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,100 £ , while the KGM Musso EV costs 36,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,886 £.

Musso EV

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the KGM Musso EV offers substantially more power – delivering 414 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 264 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the KGM Musso EV is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the SEAT Ateca takes 9 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the KGM Musso EV delivers considerably more torque with 678 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 318 Nm more.

Ateca

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, SEAT Ateca is clearly lighter – 1,345 kg compared to 2,165 kg. The difference is around 820 kg.

When it comes to payload, the KGM Musso EV carries substantially more – 905 kg compared to 525 kg. That’s a difference of about 380 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The KGM Musso EV holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,000
Musso EV

KGM Musso EV

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 207 - 414 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 23 - 26 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 379 - 420 km
details

Frequently compared as well

SEAT Ateca
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The SEAT Ateca and Skoda Kamiq are two popular compact SUVs that take different approaches: the Ateca leans toward a roomier, more driver-focused experience while the Kamiq prioritizes city-friendly practicality and efficiency. This comparison will focus on space, driving dynamics, equipment and …
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
The SEAT Ateca and the VW T‑Roc are two closely related compact crossover SUVs from the Volkswagen Group, each offering a blend of practicality, comfort and engaging driving manners. This comparison will highlight where the Ateca’s straightforward value and roomy practicality differ from the …
SEAT Ateca
KGM Musso EV

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

SEAT Ateca

The SEAT Ateca blends sharp, purposeful styling with practical space that turns everyday errands into something a bit more enjoyable. It’s poised and engaging to drive for its segment, offers solid value, and has just enough personality to make you smile on the school run.

details
SEAT-Ateca-2020_36_HQ
SEAT-Ateca_012
SEAT-Ateca_011
SEAT-Ateca_006
SEAT-Ateca_004

Reviews SEAT Ateca

4.5 (7 Reviews)
rate
editor
1 Jul 2026, 17:23:30

Exactly the right size. Just still suitable for families. The touchscreen is nicely integrated, not just a tablet stuck on — it flows into a console with the Virtual Cockpit and still has real buttons for the most important everyday functions. Perfect mix. My comparisons were the new 2er Active Tourer, the B‑Class and the Kia Sportage. The Ateca won for me overall by a clear margin, but it was a bit overpriced in comparison. And it wasn't my dream car. More a "practical car." Cheap is a thing of the past.

The speedo shows up to 218 km/h, but it really struggles to get beyond about 180. Above 150 km/h it also gets noticeably louder, but still acceptable. For people who like to glide along comfortably it's a very good choice; for those who like to drive fast, rather not. It handles dirt tracks well thanks to its ground clearance, and it also takes corners very well. Already somewhat sporty, agile.

Folding tow hitch, partially autonomous driving, lots of useful driver aids, a good multimedia concept, etc., as well as the very good seating position and controls make it attractive.

My previous 2.0L diesel was noticeably better to drive at higher speeds. But yes, times have changed. Not everything is perfect, but overall it has earned its 5 stars when you factor in the price and compare what you get for your money. 1.5 TSI Xperience DSG +XL + ***

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Stefan
10 Jun 2026, 12:17:28

The Seat Ateca is a very affordable SUV with excellent handling and plenty of space for the whole family. A companion that can do it all and is equally suited to everyday use as to long trips fully loaded. A very good choice for the active family that needs a car that fits most needs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nico
20 May 2026, 12:31:33

+ Great, firm seats, large boot for such a compact car, good fuel economy, lots of interior space, uncomplicated controls, very agile and safe handling, good build quality, very good steering, good braking performance, relatively small turning circle
- Very poor voice control and navigation, cockpit display too small with very small fonts and symbols, steering wheel too thin, seats too flat despite electric adjustment, poor engine soundproofing, tank far too small, complicated maintenance (oil change appalling), undersized rear brake, fuel filler on the wrong side, sound almost without bass (Beats)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

KGM Musso EV

The Musso EV blends pickup practicality with an electric drivetrain, delivering quiet performance and a roomy, well-equipped cabin that suits both work and everyday use. Its robust design and straightforward controls make it a compelling choice for buyers who want a capable utility vehicle with cleaner operation.

details
serpimg_XBhXgy

Reviews KGM Musso EV

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

CUPRA Terramar
SEAT Ateca
VS
The CUPRA Terramar serves up sharp handling, punchy powertrains and a premium, slightly flashy cabin that feels like the hot hatch’s grown-up, wearing an SUV’s clothes. The SEAT Ateca is the sensible alternative — roomier, cheaper to run and refreshingly unpretentious — perfect for buyers who want …
SEAT Arona
SEAT Ateca
VS
SEAT Arona and SEAT Ateca go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the SEAT Arona or the SEAT Ateca …
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the SEAT Ateca stands out with its sportier design and slightly more powerful engine options compared to the Volkswagen T-Cross. While the T-Cross offers a comfortable ride with an emphasis on practicality and interior space, the Ateca leans towards a more …
Kia Sportage
SEAT Ateca
VS
When comparing the Kia Sportage and the SEAT Ateca, both models stand out for their blend of style and practicality. The Sportage boasts a more spacious interior and a comprehensive suite of tech features, appealing to families and tech enthusiasts alike. Meanwhile, the Ateca offers agile handling …
Ford Kuga
SEAT Ateca
VS
In the highly competitive compact SUV segment, the Ford Kuga and SEAT Ateca both offer compelling options for consumers. The Kuga stands out with its robust hybrid powertrain options and impressive in-cabin technology, while the Ateca boasts a sportier drive and agility on the road, enhanced by its …
SEAT Ateca
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The SEAT Ateca and Suzuki Vitara are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want everyday practicality with a bit of style, but they take different routes to get there. The Ateca favours sharper driving dynamics, a more refined cabin and stronger tech, while the Vitara prioritises value, straightforward …
CUPRA Ateca
SEAT Ateca
VS
The CUPRA Ateca turns the sensible family SUV into a pocket rocket with sharper suspension, a punchier engine and aggressive styling that makes commuting feel like a weekend trackday. If you prefer lower running costs, more comfort and smarter value, the SEAT Ateca is the clear choice — practical, …
Honda HR-V
SEAT Ateca
VS
Honda HR-V and SEAT Ateca go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Honda HR-V or the SEAT Ateca …
SEAT Ateca
KGM Musso EV

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,100 - 36,900 £
Price
36,000 - 45,400 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 6.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
23 - 26 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
379 - 420 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 144 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Pickup
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,345 - 1,514 kg
Curb weight
2,165 - 2,285 kg
Trunk capacity
510 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,841 mm
Width
1,920 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
516 - 525 kg
Payload
805 - 905 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 150 HP
Power HP
207 - 414 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 11 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
Torque
339 - 678 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Power kW
152 - 304 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,968 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
SEAT
Brand
KGM
What drive types are available for the SEAT Ateca?

The SEAT Ateca is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.