VS

Skoda Elroq vs Rolls-Royce Phantom comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 571 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 445,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Elroq or Rolls-Royce Phantom?

Skoda Elroq vs Rolls-Royce Phantom: Key differences

Skoda Elroq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • noticeably lighter

Rolls-Royce Phantom

  • substantially more power
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Video - Skoda Elroq

Video Thumbnail
▶

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Elroq

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Elroq is clearly cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Phantom costs 445,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 407,846 £.

Phantom

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Phantom offers substantially more power – delivering 571 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 231 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Phantom is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 5.3 s, while the Skoda Elroq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Phantom delivers visibly more torque with 900 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 221 Nm more.

Elroq

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Elroq is noticeably lighter – 2,133 kg compared to 2,560 kg. The difference is around 427 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Rolls-Royce Phantom offers somewhat more boot space – 548 L compared to 470 L. That’s a difference of about 78 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Elroq carries a bit more – 517 kg compared to 440 kg. That’s a difference of about 77 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Elroq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Elroq

Skoda Elroq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 286 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.2 - 16.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 529 - 573 km
details

Frequently compared as well

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Skoda Enyaq vs Skoda Elroq: the seasoned EV family hauler squares up to the fresh-faced compact crossover in a duel for your driveway. Same sensible Czech DNA, but which one nails the sweet spot of space, range, and value without draining your budget—or your patience?
Skoda Elroq
Rolls-Royce Phantom

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Elroq

The Skoda Elroq is a cleverly packaged family SUV that mixes roomy practicality with sharp, modern looks, making it an easy pick for buyers who prefer common sense over flash. On the road it's composed and user-friendly, with thoughtful interior details that turn everyday driving into something pleasantly efficient — a sensible companion with a wink.

details
1_skoda_elroq_166e0554
2_skoda_elroq_b393d405
28_skoda_elroq_3a5d05f5

Reviews Skoda Elroq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
Kay
2 Mar 2026, 11:27:36

We’ve been driving the Elroq 85 Sportline for four weeks. Nice SUV — functional and not overdone. Downside for me: software issues. Infotainment crashed once so far, and the traffic-sign recognition isn’t updating (often shows outdated roadworks).

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
ygfg
16 Feb 2026, 01:00:58

yg

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Franz E.
21 Nov 2025, 11:43:00

Excellent value for money; top-notch equipment.

Rolls-Royce Phantom

The Phantom stands as the epitome of luxury and craftsmanship, effortlessly merging opulence with unparalleled performance. With its iconic design and attention to detail, this flagship sedan commands respect on the road while cocooning its passengers in sumptuous comfort. Every journey in the Phantom is an experience, where timeless elegance meets cutting-edge technology.

details
serpimg_Nvbd2M

Reviews Rolls-Royce Phantom

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

VW ID.3
Skoda Elroq
VS
Line them up and the electric VW ID.3 comes off as the clever, zippy high-tech hatch you want for city runs and engaging driving, while the Skoda Elroq plays the straight man—roomy, practical and relentlessly sensible. Pick the ID.3 for zero‑emission fun and gadgetry; go for the Elroq if everyday …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Elroq
VS
Packed into a compact electric package, the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers premium polish and slick tech while the Skoda Elroq plays the clever-value card with roomy practicality and a friendlier price tag. Which one should sit in your garage — the status-savvy Q4 e-tron or the no-nonsense Elroq? We’ll …
Skoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
In this head-to-head, the Škoda Elroq squares up against the quirky Toyota C-HR+, pitting Škoda’s roomy, sensible practicality against Toyota’s bold looks and city-savvy efficiency. Which one deserves your money and garage space — the value-packed family hauler or the personality-packed crossover …
Toyota bZ4X
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Toyota bZ4X stakes its claim as a sensible, go-anywhere electric with Toyota toughness and straightforward tech, while the Skoda Elroq answers with clever packaging, sharper styling and a dose of European practicality. In this short showdown we’ll cut through badges and specs to tell you which …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Ford Explorer EV arrives with true American muscle—room for the whole crew, solid range and tow-ready guts—perfect if you want a family hauler that eats motorways for breakfast. The Skoda Elroq, by contrast, is a nimble, value-packed city specialist with clever storage and low running costs, …
Volvo EX40
Skoda Elroq
VS
Think of the Volvo EX40 as the cool, safety-obsessed Swede — minimalist cabin, clever tech and a calm, premium feel — while the Skoda Elroq is all about everyday practicality: roomy, sensible and great value for money. Want Scandinavian refinement and understated luxury? Pick the EX40; want space, …
CUPRA Tavascan
Skoda Elroq
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the CUPRA Tavascan showcases its sporty aesthetics and performance-oriented features, making it a standout in the electric SUV segment. Meanwhile, the Skoda Elroq offers a more pragmatic approach with its spacious interior and impressive range, appealing to families …
CUPRA Born
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electrification, the CUPRA Born and Skoda Elroq present unique offerings for discerning drivers. While the Born boasts a sportier design and performance-oriented features that cater to enthusiasts, the Elroq shines with its practicality and value, making it a perfect choice for …
Skoda Elroq
Rolls-Royce Phantom

Costs and Consumption
Price
37,900 - 45,500 £
Price
445,700 - 514,300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
15.5 - 15.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 16.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
529 - 573 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
77 - 79 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
351 - 361 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,133 - 2,268 kg
Curb weight
2,560 - 2,610 kg
Trunk capacity
470 L
Trunk capacity
0 - 548 L
Length
4,488 mm
Length
-
Width
1,884 mm
Width
2,018 mm
Height
1,608 - 1,625 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,580 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
470 - 517 kg
Payload
390 - 440 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Power HP
571 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 5.4 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Torque
900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Power kW
420 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,022
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Rolls-Royce
What drive types are available for the Skoda Elroq?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.