VS

Skoda Elroq vs Volvo EX40 comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (32,000 £ vs 45,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Elroq or Volvo EX40?

Skoda Elroq vs Volvo EX40: Key differences

Skoda Elroq

4.5 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • marginally more efficient
  • very slightly lighter
  • a bit more trunk space
details

Volvo EX40

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • very slightly more electric range
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Elroq

Volvo EX40 vs Skoda Elroq: what really matters in daily driving

The Volvo EX40 and Skoda Elroq meet head‑to‑head in a compact EV showdown that’s less about numbers and more about how they live with you. Think of this Volvo EX40 VS Skoda Elroq comparison as a reality check on character, comfort and usability. The EX40 leans into a calm, premium vibe with effortless punch, while the Elroq majors on space, softness and value. Both are quiet and easygoing, but they go about ease of use in different ways that will quickly become obvious on your commute and your next family trip.

EX40

Driving character and everyday feel

The Volvo EX40 feels instantly stronger when you tap the accelerator, yet it prefers a relaxed rhythm to backroad antics. Steering is light and secure but a touch aloof, underlining its serene, safety‑first character. The Skoda Elroq feels more neutral and steady than urgent, with a chassis tuned for stability and confidence rather than thrills. If you want quick thrust with a premium hush, the EX40 suits; if you value calm, predictable responses and a settled gait, the Elroq plays to that brief.

Elroq

Ride comfort and long‑distance manners

On motorways both settle down nicely, though they take different paths to the same destination. The EX40’s front seats are superb for hours at a time and cabin noise is impressively low; just be mindful that very large wheels can chip away at its plushness on rougher surfaces. The Skoda Elroq rides with a gentle, well‑damped composure that keeps bad roads at arm’s length and remains wonderfully stable at speed. Efficiency tends to tilt toward the Elroq on long hauls, while the EX40’s integrated Google route planning makes charging stops feel less stressful when you press on.

EX40

Cabin tech and usability

The EX40’s Google‑built‑in setup nails navigation and voice control, but occasional software hiccups and menu‑deep settings for regen can frustrate. Its interface is clean and the one‑pedal mode is great in town, though the reversing camera could be crisper and rearward visibility isn’t its strong suit. The Elroq’s latest infotainment boots quickly and the menu logic is straightforward, but key climate functions live behind the touchscreen and take a week to feel second nature. If you want seamless maps and route planning, the Volvo feels smarter; if you prefer a clear, conventional menu flow and less tech drama, the Skoda keeps things easy.

Elroq

Space, practicality and family life

Families will notice the Elroq’s generous second row first: access is easy, head‑ and kneeroom are adult‑friendly, and fitting child seats is simple. Its boot is usefully shaped and carries more, though the load lip is high and you don’t get a perfectly flat floor with the seats folded. The EX40 isn’t as airy in the back, but it counters with clever touches: a variable boot floor that doubles as a divider and a small front trunk for cables and messy bits. Day to day, the Skoda wins for outright space and payload, while the Volvo’s thoughtful storage and tidy footprint make city living simpler.

EX40

Costs, efficiency and buyer fit

The Skoda Elroq undercuts the Volvo on price and typically sips a little less energy, making it the stronger value play for high‑mileage families. The Volvo EX40 feels more premium inside and delivers stronger acceleration, but asks more at the till and on faster journeys may require a touch more charging discipline. City dwellers will appreciate how easily the EX40 slots into tight streets and its relaxed one‑pedal flow, while the Elroq suits buyers who prioritise room, comfort and calm efficiency above all else. If your brief is premium feel and stress‑free thrust, lean Volvo; if it’s space, serenity and sensible running, the Skoda lines up neatly—now let’s see how the specs underpin those differences.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 pits two compact premium electric SUVs against each other: the Q4 e-tron brings Audi’s refined driving dynamics and a traditionally upscale cabin, while the EX40 focuses on minimalist Scandinavian design, safety, and efficiency. Choose the Q4 for a …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Elroq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Elroq is substantially cheaper – starting at 32,000 £ , while the Volvo EX40 costs 45,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,200 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Elroq is marginally more efficient: consuming 15.1 kWh/100km compared to 16.6 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX40. That’s a difference of about 1.5 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX40 offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 576 km, about 2 km more than the Skoda Elroq.

EX40

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX40 offers noticeably more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX40 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Skoda Elroq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Elroq delivers marginally more torque with 679 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 9 Nm more.

Elroq

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Elroq is very slightly lighter – 2,036 kg compared to 2,040 kg. The difference is around 4 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Elroq offers a bit more boot space – 470 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 60 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Elroq carries slightly more – 549 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Elroq sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £32,000
Elroq

Skoda Elroq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 441 - 574 km
details
Skoda Elroq
Volvo EX40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Elroq

The Skoda Elroq is a practical and well-rounded compact SUV that blends clever packaging with a calm, comfortable ride. It offers a sensible interior, straightforward technology and a value-focused approach, making it a particularly good choice for families and everyday drivers.

details
1_skoda_elroq_166e0554
2_skoda_elroq_b393d405
28_skoda_elroq_3a5d05f5

Reviews Skoda Elroq

4.5 (8 Reviews)
rate
Dirk
16 May 2026, 17:53:06

For me personally, compared directly with the ID4 "GTX", the Elroq is the slightly more mature and better-thought-out car for everyday use. It offers better ride comfort, software that runs a bit more smoothly for me, and by far the nicer design.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Gerry
15 May 2026, 09:17:17

First electric buy, so glad we chose the Elroq. Everything is so intuitive, car very spacious comfortable and nicely appointed, everything just feels right. Turning circle of 9.3M is so useful for such a largish car. Only small gripe is it's has quite a bit of road noise at 100KPH plus, absolutely fine below .

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Caelin
14 May 2026, 14:15:42

EV built for 80 km/h roads; range is very disappointing if you use the highway daily. You won't find this in the specifications. Which means in hindsight it wasn't the right choice.
Comfort fine.
Car catches a lot of wind; a lot of wind noise/whistling.
It's a shame that you have to reset a number of functions every time you start; no automatic memory.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Kay
2 Mar 2026, 11:27:36

We’ve been driving the Elroq 85 Sportline for four weeks. Nice SUV — functional and not overdone. Downside for me: software issues. Infotainment crashed once so far, and the traffic-sign recognition isn’t updating (often shows outdated roadworks).

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
ygfg
16 Feb 2026, 01:00:58

yg

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Volvo EX40

The Volvo EX40 is a compact electric SUV that blends Scandinavian minimalism with a comfortable, high-quality interior suited to daily driving and longer trips. It prioritizes safety and intuitive technology, delivering a calm, refined experience that feels mature and easy to live with.

details
311247_XC40_Recharge
311246_XC40_Recharge
308521_Rear-wheel_drive_more_range_and_faster_charging_for_fully_electric_Volvo

Reviews Volvo EX40

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
Bent
16 May 2026, 19:14:01

Stable car and generally good build quality — but I hate the Google and infotainment systems, which both seem designed to irritate the user as much as possible.
I'm looking at a Toyota B4ZX AWD when the lease on my EX40 expires. I need to be able to tow 1,500 kg, but without going broke.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX40
Volvo EX60
VS
Volvo’s EX40 and EX60 lock horns in a neatly staged duel: the nimble EX40 is a city-savvy, efficiency-first EV built for tight streets and savvy budgets, while the larger EX60 brings more space, stronger performance and longer range for family life and weekend escapes. Pick this showdown for a …
VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two …
Skoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Elroq and the Toyota C‑HR comes down to practicality versus personality in the compact crossover class. The Elroq emphasises roomy, clever packaging and value, while the C‑HR focuses on bold styling and efficient drivetrains—pick the Elroq for everyday versatility or the …
Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
The Volvo EX40 and Volvo XC40 put two sides of Volvo’s compact-SUV line-up head-to-head: the EX40 is a dedicated electric model focused on efficiency, range and modern tech, while the XC40 is a versatile compact SUV available with petrol, hybrid and electric options that delivers a more traditional …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Elroq
VS
Comparing the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Elroq helps you decide between two different approaches to modern motoring. I’ll focus on range, interior space, driving dynamics, technology and ownership costs so you can pick the one that best matches your priorities.
VW ID.3
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the VW ID.3 and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a nimble, hatchback-style EV focused on urban driving or a slightly more spacious, crossover-style model prioritizing practicality. This comparison looks at range, interior space, driving feel and overall value to help …
Ford Explorer EV
Volvo EX40
VS
In one corner the burly, tech-heavy Ford Explorer EV tries to translate American SUV swagger into electric range and cargo-flex practicality, while the polished Volvo EX40 delivers Scandinavian poise, efficient packaging and a safety-first, city-friendly footprint. If you crave roomy presence and …
Hyundai Kona
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Hyundai Kona and the Škoda Elroq are close rivals in the small-to-compact SUV segment — this quick comparison will help you spot the practical differences that matter. The Kona is a nimble, tech-rich option with multiple powertrain choices (including electric), while the Elroq prioritizes …
Skoda Elroq
Volvo EX40

Costs and Consumption
Price
32,000 - 47,000 £
Price
45,200 - 56,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
441 - 574 km
Electric Range
477 - 576 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,036 - 2,255 kg
Curb weight
2,040 - 2,170 kg
Trunk capacity
470 L
Trunk capacity
410 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,884 mm
Width
1,863 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
482 - 549 kg
Payload
430 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Volvo
What drive types are available for the Skoda Elroq?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.