Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Enyaq vs MG HS/EHS - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (340 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (38100 £ vs 24000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or MG HS/EHS?
Enyaq
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
MG HS/EHS has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24000 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 38100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14066 £.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq performs clearly better – achieving up to 587 km, about 487 km more than the MG HS/EHS.
HS/EHS
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq has a slightly edge – offering 340 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the MG HS/EHS takes 6.80 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the MG HS/EHS performs minimal better – reaching 195 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls clearly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 329 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Enyaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, MG HS/EHS is distinct lighter – 1625 kg compared to 2002 kg. The difference is around 377 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers slightly more room – 585 L compared to 507 L. That’s a difference of about 78 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs to a small extent better – up to 1710 L, which is about 226 L more than the MG HS/EHS.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq noticeable takes the win – 509 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 109 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Skoda Enyaq shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £38,100
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Enyaq
MG HS/EHS
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
MG HS/EHS
5 (1 Reviews)
The MG HS, also known as the EHS in its hybrid variant, is a midsize SUV that combines modern design with a focus on comfort and technology. Its spacious interior offers a premium feel, enhanced by quality materials and an array of advanced features aimed at ensuring a smooth driving experience. Known for its efficiency, the MG HS/EHS delivers an enjoyable ride whether navigating city streets or taking on longer road trips.
details
Skoda Enyaq
MG HS/EHS
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
Price
24000 - 36000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 7.6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
Electric Range
100 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
14 - 173 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
Curb weight
1625 - 1930 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
441 - 507 L
|
|
Length
4658 mm
|
Length
4655 - 4670 mm
|
|
Width
1879 mm
|
Width
1890 mm
|
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
Height
1663 - 1664 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1291 - 1484 L
|
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Payload
400 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
170 - 272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 9.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
Max Speed
190 - 195 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
275 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
125 - 200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1496 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B, D
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
MG
|
Is the Skoda Enyaq offered with different drivetrains?
The Skoda Enyaq is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.