VS

Skoda Enyaq vs MG HS/EHS – Which model is better for everyday use?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Skoda Enyaq or MG HS/EHS?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq @ skoda-media.de

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

MG HS/EHS has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24000 £, while the Skoda Enyaq costs 38100 £. That’s a price difference of around 14066 £.

As for range, the Skoda Enyaq performs clearly better – achieving up to 587 km, about 487 km more than the MG HS/EHS.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq has a slightly edge – offering 340 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the MG HS/EHS takes 6.80 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the MG HS/EHS performs minimal better – reaching 195 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls clearly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 329 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, MG HS/EHS is distinct lighter – 1625 kg compared to 2002 kg. The difference is around 377 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers slightly more room – 585 L compared to 507 L. That’s a difference of about 78 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs to a small extent better – up to 1710 L, which is about 226 L more than the MG HS/EHS.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq noticeable takes the win – 509 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 109 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Enyaq shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £38,100
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117406

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 16.2 kWh
  • Electric Range : 428 - 587 km
details

Skoda Enyaq

5 (2)
rate

The Škoda Enyaq represents a bold step for the Czech manufacturer, embracing a stylish design and environmental consciousness with its electric powertrain. Inside, the cabin offers a blend of comfort and advanced technology, creating a modern driving experience. With its spacious interior and practical features, the Enyaq is perfect for families or anyone looking for a practical yet luxurious electric vehicle.

details
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117406 @ skoda-media.de
SKODA_ENYAQ_COUPÃ_iV_118256 @ skoda-media.de
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117395 @ skoda-media.de
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117410 @ skoda-media.de
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117400 @ skoda-media.de

MG HS/EHS

5 (1)
rate

The MG HS, also known as the EHS in its hybrid variant, is a midsize SUV that combines modern design with a focus on comfort and technology. Its spacious interior offers a premium feel, enhanced by quality materials and an array of advanced features aimed at ensuring a smooth driving experience. Known for its efficiency, the MG HS/EHS delivers an enjoyable ride whether navigating city streets or taking on longer road trips.

details

Reviews MG HS/EHS

Mac Finn 29 Oct 2025, 11:27:52

Good perfomance and superbly low fuel consumption in daily use.

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
CUPRA Tavascan
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Between the showy CUPRA Tavascan and the sensible Skoda Enyaq you get adrenaline and design versus roominess and value — the Tavascan is a sporty, design-led EV that prioritises engagement, while the Enyaq is a spacious, pragmatic family SUV with sensible range and a friendlier price of entry. Pick the Tavascan to turn heads and enjoy sharper handling; choose the Enyaq if rear-seat comfort, boot space and real-world practicality win the day.
Skoda Enyaq
MG HS/EHS
Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
38100 - 52200 £
Price
24000 - 36000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 7.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
Electric Range
100 km
Battery Capacity
59 - 79 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
14 - 173 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
Curb weight
1625 - 1930 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
441 - 507 L
Length
4658 - 4660 mm
Length
4655 - 4670 mm
Width
1879 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
Height
1663 - 1664 mm
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
Max trunk capacity
1291 - 1484 L
Payload
457 - 509 kg
Payload
400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
170 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 9.6 s
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
Max Speed
190 - 195 km/h
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
Torque
275 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
125 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1496 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B, D
Brand
Skoda
Brand
MG

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
The Škoda Enyaq is the roomy, no-nonsense EV SUV that puts practicality and bang‑for‑buck front and centre, while the VW ID.7 Touring is a sleek, aerodynamic estate that prioritises range and motorway comfort — sensible family hauler versus long‑distance specialist. Buy the Enyaq for space, simplicity and value; choose the ID.7 Touring if you want a more refined cabin, better high‑speed efficiency and the sort of long legs that turn weekends into epic road trips.
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX40
VS
The Skoda Enyaq bundles generous space, sensible packaging and impressive range into a down‑to‑earth package that undercuts rivals on price and practicality. The Volvo EX40, by contrast, offers sharper styling, a posher interior and tauter handling — Scandi calm and high‑tech polish for buyers who prefer premium flair over rear‑seat legroom.
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
In the showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID.7, both electric SUVs impress with their modern design and spacious interiors. The Enyaq stands out with its practicality and value for money, while the ID.7 boasts cutting-edge technology and an extensive driving range. Ultimately, the choice between these two electric contenders may hinge on brand loyalty and specific feature preferences.
MG HS/EHS
MG MGS5 EV
VS
Think of the MG HS (and its EHS plug‑in hybrid) as the sensible, budget‑friendly family SUV — roomy, comfortable and annoyingly practical — while the MG MGS5 EV flips the script with instant electric torque, sharper handling and far more tech for your money. Pick the HS/EHS if you want proven value and easy refuelling; choose the MGS5 EV if you crave silent performance, lower running costs and can live with charging.
Skoda Enyaq
BYD Sealion 7
VS
In the burgeoning electric vehicle market, the Skoda Enyaq and the BYD Seal take center stage, each vying for the attention of eco-conscious drivers. The Skoda Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and family-friendly practicality, making it an ideal choice for everyday commutes and long road trips. Meanwhile, the BYD Seal distinguishes itself with its dynamic driving performance and innovative technology suite, appealing to those looking for a cutting-edge EV experience.
Honda CR-V
MG HS/EHS
VS
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the realm of family-friendly SUVs, the all-electric Skoda Enyaq and the traditional combustion engine-powered Skoda Kodiaq offer distinct experiences to prospective buyers. The Enyaq impresses with its futuristic design and seamless electric driving, providing an environmentally friendly alternative that excels in efficiency and innovation. Meanwhile, the Kodiaq stands as a versatile choice with a robust engine lineup and spacious interior, delivering a reliable performance that caters to those who prioritize long-distance capability and a classic SUV feel.
Nissan Ariya
Skoda Enyaq
VS
In the evolving landscape of electric vehicles, the Nissan Ariya and Skoda Enyaq stand out as compelling options for eco-conscious drivers. The Ariya impresses with its sleek design and advanced technology features, while the Enyaq offers a spacious interior and a strong driving range. Both models cater to different preferences, making them worthy contenders for anyone looking to step into the electric future.
Is the Skoda Enyaq offered with different drivetrains?

The Skoda Enyaq is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.