VS

Skoda Enyaq vs Polestar 4 comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 544 HP), boot space and price (41,900 £ vs 53,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Polestar 4?

Skoda Enyaq vs Polestar 4: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • noticeably more efficient
  • very slightly lighter
  • a bit more trunk space
details

Polestar 4

4.8 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • barely more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Enyaq

The Battle of the Electric SUVs: Skoda Enyaq vs Polestar 4

In the rapidly evolving world of electric vehicles, the SUV segment is seeing substantial innovation and competition. Two standout players in this space are the Skoda Enyaq and the Polestar 4. Both models offer modern design, advanced technology, and eco-friendly credentials, but how do they stack up against each other? Let's explore their technical specifications and groundbreaking features.

4

Power and Performance

The Skoda Enyaq offers a range of power outputs, with its highest performing model delivering up to 340 HP through an all-wheel-drive system. It reaches 0-100 km/h in just 5.5 seconds and has a maximum speed of 180 km/h. In contrast, the Polestar 4 boasts a maximum power output of 544 HP and an impressive acceleration from 0-100 km/h in 3.8 seconds, with a top speed of 200 km/h, showcasing its performance edge.

Enyaq

Battery Life and Efficiency

When it comes to range, the Skoda Enyaq provides a maximum electric range of 587 km on a single charge, supported by its efficient consumption of as low as 14.6 kWh/100km. On the other hand, the Polestar 4 offers a strong performance in this category with a top range of 620 km, albeit with a slightly higher energy consumption of 18.7 kWh/100km. Polestar's larger 94 kWh battery capacity plays a crucial role in extending its driving range.

4

Design and Dimensions

Both SUVs hold a striking presence on the road with their unique designs. The Skoda Enyaq measures up to 4658 mm in length, 1879 mm in width, and 1623 mm in height, offering a trunk capacity of up to 585 liters. Alternatively, the Polestar 4 stretches out more with dimensions of 4840 mm in length, 2008 mm in width, and 1534 mm in height, but with a smaller trunk capacity of 526 liters, it could be less appealing for those needing substantial cargo space.

Enyaq

Comfort and Practicality

Both vehicles are designed with practicality in mind, accommodating five passengers comfortably. The Enyaq is especially noted for its spaciousness and efficient use of interior space. Payload capacity differs slightly, with the Enyaq offering up to 528 kg compared to the Polestar 4's 516 kg, potentially a consideration for those needing to haul more substantial loads.

4

Environmental Impact and Innovation

Both the Skoda Enyaq and Polestar 4 proudly bear a CO2 efficiency class of "A," emitting zero direct carbon emissions, which is a testament to their commitment to sustainability. They each employ a reduction gearbox transmission, ensuring a smooth and efficient drive regardless of the terrain.

Enyaq

Conclusion

Ultimately, the choice between the Skoda Enyaq and the Polestar 4 boils down to priorities. For those seeking exhilarating performance and greater range, the Polestar 4 is the clear winner. However, if efficiency, spaciousness, and practicality are at the top of your list, the Skoda Enyaq stands out as a balanced and capable option in the electric SUV market. Both offer an inspiring glimpse into the future of automotive design and technology.

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail
▶

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Skoda Enyaq vs Skoda Elroq: the seasoned EV family hauler squares up to the fresh-faced compact crossover in a duel for your driveway. Same sensible Czech DNA, but which one nails the sweet spot of space, range, and value without draining your budget—or your patience?
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Enyaq is markedly cheaper – starting at 41,900 £ , while the Polestar 4 costs 53,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,143 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is noticeably more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 17.8 kWh/100km for the Polestar 4. That’s a difference of about 3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Polestar 4 offers barely more range – reaching up to 620 km, about 33 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.

4

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Polestar 4 offers visibly more power – delivering 544 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 204 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Polestar 4 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Polestar 4 delivers barely more torque with 686 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 7 Nm more.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is very slightly lighter – 2,179 kg compared to 2,230 kg. The difference is around 51 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers a bit more boot space – 585 L compared to 526 L. That’s a difference of about 59 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries barely more – 489 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 34 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Polestar 4 leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £53,100
4

Polestar 4

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 272 - 544 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.8 - 18.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 590 - 620 km
details
Skoda Enyaq
Polestar 4

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a reassuring, family‑first electric SUV that trades sporting drama for exceptional quiet, roomy rear seats and a genuinely practical boot. It’s remarkably easy to live with thanks to sensible controls and steady fast charging, though the touchscreen‑led infotainment can be sluggish and driving enthusiasts looking for sharp handling should look elsewhere.

details
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117406
SKODA_ENYAQ_COUPÃ_iV_118256
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117395
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117410
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117400

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Polestar 4

The Polestar 4 wears a coupe-like profile and a Scandinavian-minimal interior that feels premium and unexpectedly roomy, with composed handling that makes urban driving and country roads a pleasure. For buyers who want an electric car that turns heads without shouting, the Polestar 4 is a stylish, clever choice that balances practicality with personality.

details
7458E184-FE1C-49CD-8688-8D9AD87DD167
3ACA6B65-1C98-412F-9D32-588E078B6285
3634B075-6672-406F-B1C3-46F68F4A8DD7

Reviews Polestar 4

4.8 (9 Reviews)
rate
Carlos
21 Jan 2026, 19:23:48

The Polestar 4 has a very attractive design that doesn’t go unnoticed.
The interior is elegant, comfortable and finished with good materials.
Easy to drive, great grip on the tarmac and strong acceleration.
For the price, there are things to improve to be competitive with other brands of equal quality and technology; it needs meaningful upgrades — e.g., better driving ADAS, true autonomous parking and the ability to move the car remotely if you can’t get inside. Improving charging times is essential, and not having a rear window while relying on a camera in the interior mirror shouldn’t be a cause for concern. Otherwise, a spectacular car with a gorgeous design.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
The Skoda Enyaq plays the sensible family EV: calm, roomy and beautifully screwed together, while the Kia EV5 turns up with concept-car swagger, smart storage and value that’ll have accountants smiling. If you want long-haul refinement and a cavernous boot, pick the Enyaq; if bold design, generous …
Polestar 4
Volvo EX60
VS
Polestar 4 and Volvo EX60 go head-to-head in a clash of Scandinavian design, tech and electric muscle — one is a sporty provocateur, the other a polished family flagship. Time to find out which brings the sharper drive, smarter cabin and better real-world value for buyers who want style with …
CUPRA Tavascan
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Between the showy CUPRA Tavascan and the sensible Skoda Enyaq you get adrenaline and design versus roominess and value — the Tavascan is a sporty, design-led EV that prioritises engagement, while the Enyaq is a spacious, pragmatic family SUV with sensible range and a friendlier price of entry. Pick …
Polestar 3
Polestar 4
VS
Polestar 3 is the grown‑up grand tourer of the pair — a spacious, plush coupe‑SUV that favours comfort, range and open‑road refinement. The Polestar 4, by contrast, trades some rear‑seat space for sleeker styling, sharper handling and a friendlier price tag, making it the sportier, more city‑savvy …
Polestar 4
Polestar 5
VS
Polestar 4 and Polestar 5 are sibling EVs with shared design DNA but different missions: the Polestar 4 is a compact coupe‑SUV aimed at style and everyday practicality, while the Polestar 5 is a larger four‑door gran turismo focused on performance, range and long‑distance comfort. This comparison …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
The Škoda Enyaq is the roomy, no-nonsense EV SUV that puts practicality and bang‑for‑buck front and centre, while the VW ID.7 Touring is a sleek, aerodynamic estate that prioritises range and motorway comfort — sensible family hauler versus long‑distance specialist. Buy the Enyaq for space, …
BMW i4
Polestar 4
VS
The BMW i4 is the driver's EV — taut handling, rear‑drive poise and a cockpit that still feels satisfyingly analogue — while the Polestar 4 plays the Scandinavian minimalist card, pairing bold coupe‑SUV looks with luxurious simplicity and polished electric range. Choose the i4 if you want …
Polestar 4
ZEEKR 7GT
VS
Polestar 4 and ZEEKR 7GT go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Skoda Enyaq
Polestar 4

Costs and Consumption
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
Price
53,100 - 59,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 18.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
Electric Range
590 - 620 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
94 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
Curb weight
2,230 - 2,355 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
526 L
Length
-
Length
4,840 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Width
2,008 mm
Height
-
Height
1,534 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,536 L
Payload
443 - 489 kg
Payload
455 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Power HP
272 - 544 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 7.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
200 km/h
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Torque
343 - 686 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Power kW
200 - 400 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Polestar
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Enyaq have?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.