Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Enyaq vs Polestar 4 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (340 HP vs 544 HP), boot space and price (38100 £ vs 53100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Polestar 4?
Enyaq
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Skoda Enyaq has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 38100 £ , while the Polestar 4 costs 53100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15000 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s evident more efficient than the Polestar 4 with 17.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3 kWh.
As for electric range, the Polestar 4 performs barely noticeable better – achieving up to 620 km, about 33 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.
4
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Polestar 4 has a noticeable edge – offering 544 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 204 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Polestar 4 is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.40 s. That’s about 1.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Polestar 4 performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Polestar 4 pulls minimal stronger with 686 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 7 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Enyaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is a bit lighter – 2002 kg compared to 2230 kg. The difference is around 228 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers somewhat more room – 585 L compared to 526 L. That’s a difference of about 59 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs slightly better – up to 1710 L, which is about 174 L more than the Polestar 4.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq to a small extent takes the win – 509 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 54 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Polestar 4 stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Skoda Enyaq
Polestar 4
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £53,100
Polestar 4
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
Polestar 4
5 (3 Reviews)
The Polestar 4 wears a coupe-like profile and a Scandinavian-minimal interior that feels premium and unexpectedly roomy, with composed handling that makes urban driving and country roads a pleasure. For buyers who want an electric car that turns heads without shouting, the Polestar 4 is a stylish, clever choice that balances practicality with personality.
details
Skoda Enyaq
Polestar 4
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
Price
53100 - 59900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 18.7 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
Electric Range
590 - 620 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
94 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
Curb weight
2230 - 2355 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
526 L
|
|
Length
4658 mm
|
Length
4840 mm
|
|
Width
1879 mm
|
Width
2008 mm
|
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
Height
1534 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1536 L
|
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Payload
455 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
272 - 544 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 7.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
343 - 686 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
200 - 400 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Polestar
|
Is the Skoda Enyaq offered with different drivetrains?
The Skoda Enyaq is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.