Skoda Enyaq vs Polestar 4 comparison

Q: How much power does the Skoda Enyaq deliver on the road?

The Skoda Enyaq reaches a peak output of 340 HP, depending on the model.

Q: What is the Skoda Enyaq’s energy consumption?

Average electricity consumption is 14.80 kWh.

Q: What is the electric driving range of the Skoda Enyaq?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 587 km.

Q: How many kWh does the Skoda Enyaq’s battery hold?

The battery offers a capacity of 77 kWh.

Q: What are the Skoda Enyaq’s length, width and height?

Overall, the Skoda Enyaq is 4658 mm long, 1879 mm wide and 1620 mm high.

Q: Is the Polestar 4 offered with different drivetrains?

The Polestar 4 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

Q: How much power does the Polestar 4 deliver on the road?

Depending on the version, the Polestar 4 delivers up to 544 HP.

Q: What are the Polestar 4’s WLTP consumption values in kWh/100 km?

In the WLTP cycle, the Polestar 4 consumes around 17.80 kWh.

Q: How far can the Polestar 4 go on a full charge?

The WLTP range is up to 620 km.

Compare performance (340 HP vs 544 HP), boot space and price (41900 £ vs 53100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Polestar 4?

scroll down

Enyaq

The Battle of the Electric SUVs: Skoda Enyaq vs Polestar 4

In the rapidly evolving world of electric vehicles, the SUV segment is seeing substantial innovation and competition. Two standout players in this space are the Skoda Enyaq and the Polestar 4. Both models offer modern design, advanced technology, and eco-friendly credentials, but how do they stack up against each other? Let's explore their technical specifications and groundbreaking features.

Power and Performance

The Skoda Enyaq offers a range of power outputs, with its highest performing model delivering up to 340 HP through an all-wheel-drive system. It reaches 0-100 km/h in just 5.5 seconds and has a maximum speed of 180 km/h. In contrast, the Polestar 4 boasts a maximum power output of 544 HP and an impressive acceleration from 0-100 km/h in 3.8 seconds, with a top speed of 200 km/h, showcasing its performance edge.

Enyaq

Battery Life and Efficiency

When it comes to range, the Skoda Enyaq provides a maximum electric range of 587 km on a single charge, supported by its efficient consumption of as low as 14.6 kWh/100km. On the other hand, the Polestar 4 offers a strong performance in this category with a top range of 620 km, albeit with a slightly higher energy consumption of 18.7 kWh/100km. Polestar's larger 94 kWh battery capacity plays a crucial role in extending its driving range.

Design and Dimensions

Both SUVs hold a striking presence on the road with their unique designs. The Skoda Enyaq measures up to 4658 mm in length, 1879 mm in width, and 1623 mm in height, offering a trunk capacity of up to 585 liters. Alternatively, the Polestar 4 stretches out more with dimensions of 4840 mm in length, 2008 mm in width, and 1534 mm in height, but with a smaller trunk capacity of 526 liters, it could be less appealing for those needing substantial cargo space.

scroll down

Enyaq

Comfort and Practicality

Both vehicles are designed with practicality in mind, accommodating five passengers comfortably. The Enyaq is especially noted for its spaciousness and efficient use of interior space. Payload capacity differs slightly, with the Enyaq offering up to 528 kg compared to the Polestar 4's 516 kg, potentially a consideration for those needing to haul more substantial loads.

Environmental Impact and Innovation

Both the Skoda Enyaq and Polestar 4 proudly bear a CO2 efficiency class of "A," emitting zero direct carbon emissions, which is a testament to their commitment to sustainability. They each employ a reduction gearbox transmission, ensuring a smooth and efficient drive regardless of the terrain.

Enyaq

Conclusion

Ultimately, the choice between the Skoda Enyaq and the Polestar 4 boils down to priorities. For those seeking exhilarating performance and greater range, the Polestar 4 is the clear winner. However, if efficiency, spaciousness, and practicality are at the top of your list, the Skoda Enyaq stands out as a balanced and capable option in the electric SUV market. Both offer an inspiring glimpse into the future of automotive design and technology.

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq vs Polestar 4: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)

clearly perceptible cheaper
evident more efficient
barely noticeable lighter
somewhat more trunk space

Polestar 4

4.8 (8 Reviews)

noticeable more power
barely noticeable more electric range
convincingly quicker from 0–100 km/h

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Enyaq has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41900 £ , while the Polestar 4 costs 53100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11143 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s evident more efficient than the Polestar 4 with 17.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3 kWh.

As for electric range, the Polestar 4 performs barely noticeable better – achieving up to 620 km, about 33 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Polestar 4 has a noticeable edge – offering 544 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 204 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Polestar 4 is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.40 s. That’s about 1.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Polestar 4 performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Polestar 4 pulls minimal stronger with 686 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 7 Nm difference.

scroll down

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is barely noticeable lighter – 2179 kg compared to 2230 kg. The difference is around 51 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers somewhat more room – 585 L compared to 526 L. That’s a difference of about 59 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs slightly better – up to 1710 L, which is about 174 L more than the Polestar 4.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq slight takes the win – 489 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 34 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Polestar 4 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq

Skoda Elroq

Skoda Enyaq is the composed, fully electric family SUV that prizes range, space and a quietly premium feel for buyers ready to go electric. The Skoda Elroq is the cheekier, budget-friendly sibling—petrol and hybrid options, sharper looks and clever packaging—for shoppers who want SUV practicality …

Skoda Enyaq

Kia EV5

The Skoda Enyaq plays the sensible family EV: calm, roomy and beautifully screwed together, while the Kia EV5 turns up with concept-car swagger, smart storage and value that’ll have accountants smiling. If you want long-haul refinement and a cavernous boot, pick the Enyaq; if bold design, generous …

Skoda Enyaq

Polestar 4

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Price

Consumption kWh/100km

Electric Range

Battery Capacity

co2

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Power HP

Acceleration 0-100km/h

Max Speed

Torque

Power kW

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Seats

Curb weight

Trunk capacity

Max trunk capacity

Payload

from about £53,100

Polestar 4

Price : 53100 - 59900 £
Body Type : SUV
Engine Type : Electric
Transmission : Automatic
Transmission Detail : Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP : 272 - 544 HP
Consumption kWh/100km : 17.8 - 18.7 kWh
Electric Range : 590 - 620 km
Battery Capacity : 94 kWh
Seats : 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h : 3.8 - 7.1 s
Model Year : 2024
Max Speed : 200 km/h
Torque : 343 - 686 Nm
Doors : 5
Model : 4
Modell : 4 Long Range Dual Motor, 4 Long Range Single Motor
CO2 Efficiency Class : A
Power kW : 200 - 400 kW
co2 : 0 g/km
Curb weight : 2230 - 2355 kg
Trunk capacity : 526 L
Length : 4840 mm
Width : 2008 mm
Height : 1534 mm
Brand : Polestar
Max trunk capacity : 1536 L
Payload : 455 kg

details

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)

The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.

details

Polestar 4

4.8 (8 Reviews)

The Polestar 4 wears a coupe-like profile and a Scandinavian-minimal interior that feels premium and unexpectedly roomy, with composed handling that makes urban driving and country roads a pleasure. For buyers who want an electric car that turns heads without shouting, the Polestar 4 is a stylish, clever choice that balances practicality with personality.

details

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)

Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Genomtänkt och praktisk bil, (85x my2024) som tyvärr fallerar pga buggar i systemet och irriterande förarstödsystem som inte klarar vanligt höst eller vinterväder utan felmeddelanden och varningar

Show detailed rating

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)

Efficiency / Consumption & Range

Comfort & Interior

Driving Fun / Performance

Technology & Infotainment

Safety

Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use

Value for Money

Reviews Polestar 4

4.8 (8 Reviews)

Carlos
21 Jan 2026, 19:23:48

The Polestar 4 has a very attractive design that doesn’t go unnoticed.
The interior is elegant, comfortable and finished with good materials.
Easy to drive, great grip on the tarmac and strong acceleration.
For the price, there are things to improve to be competitive with other brands of equal quality and technology; it needs meaningful upgrades — e.g., better driving ADAS, true autonomous parking and the ability to move the car remotely if you can’t get inside. Improving charging times is essential, and not having a rear window while relying on a camera in the interior mirror shouldn’t be a cause for concern. Otherwise, a spectacular car with a gorgeous design.

Show detailed rating

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)

Efficiency / Consumption & Range

Comfort & Interior

Driving Fun / Performance

Technology & Infotainment

Safety

Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use

Value for Money

Skoda Enyaq

Polestar 4

Costs and Consumption
Price 41900 - 52200 £	Price 53100 - 59900 £
Consumption L/100km -	Consumption L/100km -
Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 16.2 kWh	Consumption kWh/100km 17.8 - 18.7 kWh
Electric Range 538 - 587 km	Electric Range 590 - 620 km
Battery Capacity 77 kWh	Battery Capacity 94 kWh
co2 0 g/km	co2 0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity -	Fuel tank capacity -

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 2179 - 2293 kg	Curb weight 2230 - 2355 kg
Trunk capacity 570 - 585 L	Trunk capacity 526 L
Length 4658 mm	Length 4840 mm
Width 1879 mm	Width 2008 mm
Height 1620 - 1621 mm	Height 1534 mm
Max trunk capacity 1610 - 1710 L	Max trunk capacity 1536 L
Payload 443 - 489 kg	Payload 455 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Electric	Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox	Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP 286 - 340 HP	Power HP 272 - 544 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.4 - 6.7 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 3.8 - 7.1 s
Max Speed 180 km/h	Max Speed 200 km/h
Torque 545 - 679 Nm	Torque 343 - 686 Nm
Number of Cylinders -	Number of Cylinders -
Power kW 210 - 250 kW	Power kW 200 - 400 kW
Engine capacity -	Engine capacity -