Compare performance (340 HP vs 350 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 51,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Volvo V60?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the modern automotive landscape, the Skoda Enyaq and Volvo V60 stand out as titans in their respective categories. The Enyaq represents Skoda's entry into the electric SUV market, while the V60 continues Volvo's legacy in the wagon segment with multiple powertrain options. Here's a detailed comparison that delves into the technical aspects and innovative features that make each vehicle unique.
The Skoda Enyaq is purely electric, catering to the environmentally conscious with zero emissions (0 g/km CO2). Available with multiple power outputs ranging from 204 HP to 340 HP, the Enyaq offers brisk acceleration, achieving 0-100 km/h in as little as 5.5 seconds. Its max speed caps at a respectable 180 km/h.
Conversely, the Volvo V60 offers a range of powertrains, including petrol mild hybrid, diesel mild hybrid, and a plug-in hybrid variant, with power outputs between 197 HP and 455 HP. The four-cylinder engines deliver torques up to 709 Nm, providing robust performance with a top speed also limited to 180 km/h. Acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h is as fast as 4.6 seconds, notably swift for a wagon.
Efficiency is where the Skoda Enyaq truly shines. With consumption figures between 14.6-16.4 kWh/100 km and an extensive electric range stretching to 587 km, it ensures extended drives with minimal stops.
The Volvo V60's plug-in hybrid offers a good balance between electric and fuel usage, boasting a consumption figure as low as 0.7 L/100 km and an electric range of 92 km. The V60 supports a fuel tank capacity of up to 71 liters, ideal for longer journeys without frequent refueling for non-electric uses.
Practically speaking, both the Enyaq and V60 comfortably seat five passengers and offer generous cargo space. The Enyaq provides between 570 to 585 liters of trunk capacity, while the V60 offers 519 liters. This makes both vehicles viable for family trips or carrying substantial cargo, but the Enyaq slightly edges out with its additional storage capacity.
The Skoda Enyaq embraces the SUV form factor, with dimensions of around 4650 mm in length, 1879 mm in width, and a height range of 1620 to 1623 mm. This gives it a commanding road presence and a high driving position that many drivers favor.
In contrast, the Volvo V60 retains a classic wagon silhouette, longer at approximately 4787 mm, narrower at 1850 mm, and distinctly lower in height (1432 mm to 1499 mm). This design delivers a sleek and elegant profile with a low center of gravity, contributing to enhanced handling dynamics.
The Skoda Enyaq is built on the MEB platform, emphasizing its electric-centric design with features like a reduction gearbox and options for all-wheel-drive. Its digital cockpit and sustainable material usage in the interior are notable electrification enhancements.
Meanwhile, the Volvo V60 excels in safety and semi-autonomous driving technology. Equipped with the latest infotainment system powered by Google, the V60 provides Google Assistant, Maps, and more for a seamless driving experience. Volvo’s traditional emphasis on safety is seen in its suite of driver-assist technologies and robust safety ratings.
Both the Skoda Enyaq and Volvo V60 bring unique strengths to the table. The Enyaq, with its electric prowess and modern SUV appeal, is perfect for those prioritizing sustainability without sacrificing range. The V60 offers diverse powertrain options and a storied reputation for safety and practical luxury. The choice between these titans will ultimately depend on individual preferences and priorities in the driving experience. Whether leaning towards electric versatility or hybrid efficiency, both models ensure satisfaction and cutting-edge automotive innovation.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Skoda Enyaq is visibly cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Volvo V60 costs 51,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,572 £.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers considerably more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 490 km more than the Volvo V60.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo V60 offers only slightly more power – delivering 350 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 10 HP more horsepower.
Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 5.4 s from 0 to 100 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers somewhat more torque with 679 Nm compared to 589 Nm. That’s about 90 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo V60 is slightly lighter – 1,734 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 340 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers somewhat more boot space – 585 L compared to 519 L. That’s a difference of about 66 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries only slightly more – 526 kg compared to 506 kg. That’s a difference of about 20 kg.
The Skoda Enyaq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.
details
The Volvo V60 blends elegant Scandinavian design with a practical estate layout, making it a composed and sensible choice for buyers who want style without sacrifice. Inside, a serene cabin, clever safety features and a supple ride turn daily commutes and weekend getaways into effortless, grown-up motoring.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
|
Price
51,400 - 62,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
2 - 6.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
|
Electric Range
99 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
45 - 141 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
|
Curb weight
1,734 - 2,070 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
Width
1,850 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
449 - 526 kg
|
Payload
460 - 506 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
197 - 350 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 589 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
145 - 247 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España