VS

Skoda Enyaq vs VW ID.Polo comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 226 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or VW ID.Polo?

Skoda Enyaq vs VW ID.Polo: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • markedly more electric range
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
details

VW ID.Polo

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • a bit more efficient
  • visibly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

VW ID.Polo is significantly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,424 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the VW ID.Polo is a bit more efficient: consuming 13.3 kWh/100km compared to 14.9 kWh/100km for the Skoda Enyaq. That’s a difference of about 1.6 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers markedly more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 135 km more than the VW ID.Polo.

ID.Polo

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 226 HP. That’s roughly 114 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the VW ID.Polo takes 6.8 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 389 Nm more.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW ID.Polo is visibly lighter – 1,568 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 506 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more boot space – 585 L compared to 441 L. That’s a difference of about 144 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries moderately more – 526 kg compared to 444 kg. That’s a difference of about 82 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 449 - 589 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
CUPRA Raval
VW ID.Polo
VS
The CUPRA Raval and the Volkswagen ID. Polo are fresh contenders in the compact electric city-car segment, with the Raval pushing sporty design and tech while the ID. Polo leans on Volkswagen’s familiar practicality. This comparison focuses on driving feel, range, interior space and ownership costs …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.Polo

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
04_new_skoda_enyaq_68cf74d6-1920x1280
11_new_skoda_enyaq_c2b962a0-1920x1280
12_new_skoda_enyaq_de0afe4c-1920x1280
33_new_skoda_enyaq_833cbb5e-1920x1440
48_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_dad4ad75-1920x1280
49_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_37c35e34-1920x1280
50_new_skoda_enyaq_coupe_f55ae8bb-1920x1858

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
Delporte
16 May 2026, 16:33:37

More options and more room for discounts and negotiation, just as comfortable, better than a Hyundai Ioniq 5 (which is not comfortable at all), a Toyota bZ4X (feels cramped and has little space), a Tesla Model Y Premium (a bit too high-tech for me but otherwise fine), a Jaecoo 5 (entry-level, comfort impeccable but no options and little tech), and an Omoda (less comfortable and very few options). This is all a personal opinion — we drove the cars mentioned above and the Skoda seems the best value for money with good comfort, a variety of options and reliable after-sales service close to us.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

VW ID.Polo

The VW ID.Polo brings classic Polo sensibility to the EV age with a calm, refined ride, an unusually large boot, and refreshingly simple controls with real buttons. It favors easygoing efficiency and family-friendly practicality over playful handling or high-speed autobahn pace, and the smaller-battery versions ask for a bit more planning on long trips.

details
DB2026AU00361_medium
DB2026AU00362_medium
DB2026AU00356_large
DB2026AU00304_large
DB2026AU00351_medium
DB2026AU00301_large

Reviews VW ID.Polo

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
Rajczi Zoltan
5 Jun 2026, 16:19:32

Super! Batery klein.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Kia EV2
VW ID.Polo
VS
The Kia EV2 and the Volkswagen ID. Polo are fresh contenders in the small electric hatchback segment, offering compact dimensions, modern tech and city-friendly range. This head-to-head will focus on real-world usability, costs and driving characteristics to help you decide which suits your daily …
Renault R5
VW ID.Polo
VS
This short comparison pits the Renault 5 against the Volkswagen ID. Polo to help you choose which compact electric suits your needs. We'll focus on design, range, practicality, driving feel and ownership costs so you can pick the right city car.
VW ID.Polo
Skoda Epiq
VS
Comparing the VW ID. Polo and the Skoda Epiq to help you decide which one fits your driving needs and budget. I’ll cut through the spec sheets and focus on real-world driving, interior space, tech and running costs so you can pick with confidence.
Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
Comparing the Škoda Enyaq and the Kia EV5 pits two spacious, family-friendly electric SUVs against each other: the Enyaq focuses on practicality, value and a straightforward user experience, while the EV5 emphasizes cutting-edge cabin tech, distinctive styling and a more premium feel. This short …
VW ID.3
VW ID.Polo
VS
Choosing between the Volkswagen ID.3 and the VW ID. Polo comes down to whether you want a compact electric hatch with more range and interior space (ID.3) or a smaller, city-focused EV that prioritizes maneuverability and lower running costs (ID. Polo). Below I'll compare their range, practicality, …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Here’s a clear comparison between the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq to help determine which electric SUV suits your needs. I’ll focus on driving range, interior space, technology and overall value so you can pick the right balance of practicality and performance.
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
Comparing the Skoda Enyaq and the Volkswagen ID.7 Touring pits a practical, roomy electric SUV against a sleek, long-distance electric estate. Both share VW Group underpinnings, but the Enyaq prioritizes interior space and value while the ID.7 Touring focuses on aerodynamic efficiency, range and …
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.Polo

Costs and Consumption
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Price
21,400 - 36,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13.3 - 14.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Electric Range
424 - 454 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Curb weight
1,568 - 1,635 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
441 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,879 mm
Width
1,816 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
449 - 526 kg
Payload
444 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
116 - 226 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 7.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
85 - 166 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
VW
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Enyaq have?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.