Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Enyaq vs VW Tayron - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (340 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (38100 £ vs 39600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or VW Tayron?
Enyaq
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Enyaq has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 38100 £ , while the VW Tayron costs 39600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1555 £.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq performs decisively better – achieving up to 587 km, about 464 km more than the VW Tayron.
Tayron
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq has a a bit edge – offering 340 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the VW Tayron takes 6.10 s. That’s about 0.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the VW Tayron performs noticeable better – reaching 240 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 60 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls convincingly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 279 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Enyaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, VW Tayron is somewhat lighter – 1682 kg compared to 2002 kg. The difference is around 320 kg.
In terms of boot space, the VW Tayron offers distinct more room – 885 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 300 L.
In maximum load capacity, the VW Tayron performs to a small extent better – up to 2090 L, which is about 380 L more than the Skoda Enyaq.
When it comes to payload, VW Tayron to a small extent takes the win – 566 kg compared to 509 kg. That’s a difference of about 57 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Enyaq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Skoda Enyaq
VW Tayron
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £38,100
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
VW Tayron
5 (1 Reviews)
The VW Tayron is Volkswagen's roomy, no-nonsense SUV that pairs clean, familiar styling with a practical cabin built for families and everyday use. It rides comfortably, packs sensible tech and creature comforts, and feels like the sensible sweater of SUVs for buyers who prefer steady value over headline-grabbing drama.
details
Skoda Enyaq
VW Tayron
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
Price
39600 - 53300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
Electric Range
116 - 123 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
33 - 192 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
Curb weight
1682 - 1948 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
705 - 885 L
|
|
Length
4658 mm
|
Length
4792 mm
|
|
Width
1879 mm
|
Width
1853 - 1866 mm
|
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
Height
1666 - 1668 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1915 - 2090 L
|
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Payload
489 - 566 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.1 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
Max Speed
204 - 240 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, G, B
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
VW
|
Is the Skoda Enyaq offered with different drivetrains?
The Skoda Enyaq is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.