@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VS

Skoda Enyaq vs VW Tayron – Differences & prices compared

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Skoda Enyaq or VW Tayron?

Enyaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Enyaq vs VW Tayron: A Detailed Car Comparison

As electric vehicles become increasingly popular and the automotive market continues to evolve, the comparison between established players like Skoda and VW raises eyebrows. The Skoda Enyaq and VW Tayron are two notable entries in the SUV segment, but they cater to different driving needs and preferences. This article will delve into their technical specifications, innovations, and what sets them apart in the competitive SUV market.

Tayron @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Powertrain and Performance

The Skoda Enyaq is an all-electric SUV available in multiple configurations, boasting power outputs ranging from 150 kW (204 HP) to a sporty 250 kW (340 HP). The Enyaq features both rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive options, making it a versatile choice for various driving conditions. Its acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h is an impressive 5.5 seconds for the top specification, with a maximum speed of 180 km/h.

In contrast, the VW Tayron features a mix of petrol, diesel, and hybrid options, with power outputs between 110 kW (150 HP) and 200 kW (272 HP). The Tayron's acceleration figures range from a respectable 7.3 seconds to an impressive 6.1 seconds for the performance variants, with a top speed reaching as high as 240 km/h. The diversity of engine options in the Tayron allows for greater flexibility to choose a model tailored to personal power preferences.

Enyaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Energy Efficiency and Driving Range

When it comes to energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq shines with figures as low as 14.6 kWh/100 km, indicating a highly efficient electric drivetrain. This efficient energy use translates to an impressive electric range of up to 587 km on a single charge, making it ideal for long journeys and weekend getaways.

On the flip side, the VW Tayron’s fuel consumption ranges between 5.4 to 7.8 L/100 km, depending on the engine choice and driving style. The hybrid models provide a limited electric range of around 126 km, which might cater to those who mostly drive in urban settings but falls short of the Enyaq’s capabilities for longer trips.

Tayron @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Interior Comfort and Technology

Both vehicles cater to families with five seats and spacious interiors. The Skoda Enyaq offers a trunk capacity of 585 liters, ensuring ample storage for luggage, while the VW Tayron boasts a slightly larger trunk capacity of 885 liters, beneficial for those needing extra space.

In terms of technology, the Enyaq emphasizes an intuitive user interface paired with a suite of safety features, including advanced driver assistance systems. Moreover, it integrates innovative infotainment systems that are user-friendly and enhance the overall driving experience.

The Tayron, however, integrates a sophisticated digital cockpit that adds a modern touch to the traditional SUV experience. With advanced connectivity options and a customizable display, the Tayron caters to tech-savvy drivers who value a personal touch in their driving environment.

Enyaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Conclusion: Which One is Right for You?

Deciding between the Skoda Enyaq and VW Tayron largely depends on individual preferences and needs. The Enyaq stands out for those looking for an eco-friendly, fully electric vehicle with impressive driving range and energy efficiency. It combines modern design with functionality, making it a practical choice for both city and highway driving.

Conversely, the VW Tayron appeals to those wanting versatility in powertrains with a mix of petrol, diesel, and hybrid options. Its robust performance and larger trunk capacity make it suitable for families or adventurers who require flexibility in their vehicle choice.

Ultimately, both the Skoda Enyaq and VW Tayron deliver unique selling points that can cater to different lifestyles. Whether you lean towards an electric future or prefer traditional combustion engines, the choice is yours.

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Tayron @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Enyaq has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 38100 £, while the VW Tayron costs 39600 £. That’s a price difference of around 1555 £.

As for range, the Skoda Enyaq performs decisively better – achieving up to 587 km, about 464 km more than the VW Tayron.

Enyaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq has a a bit edge – offering 340 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the VW Tayron takes 6.10 s. That’s about 0.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW Tayron performs noticeable better – reaching 240 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 60 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls convincingly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 279 Nm difference.

Tayron @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, VW Tayron is somewhat lighter – 1682 kg compared to 2002 kg. The difference is around 320 kg.

In terms of boot space, the VW Tayron offers distinct more room – 885 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 300 L.

In maximum load capacity, the VW Tayron performs to a small extent better – up to 2090 L, which is about 380 L more than the Skoda Enyaq.

When it comes to payload, VW Tayron to a small extent takes the win – 566 kg compared to 509 kg. That’s a difference of about 57 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Enyaq shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £38,100
Enyaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 16.2 kWh
  • Electric Range : 428 - 587 km

Skoda Enyaq

5 (3)
rate

The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.

details

VW Tayron

The VW Tayron is Volkswagen's roomy, no-nonsense SUV that pairs clean, familiar styling with a practical cabin built for families and everyday use. It rides comfortably, packs sensible tech and creature comforts, and feels like the sensible sweater of SUVs for buyers who prefer steady value over headline-grabbing drama.

details
Skoda Enyaq
VW Tayron
Enyaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Tayron @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Costs and Consumption

Price
38100 - 52200 £
Price
39600 - 53300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
Electric Range
116 - 123 km
Battery Capacity
59 - 79 kWh
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
33 - 192 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
Curb weight
1682 - 1948 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
705 - 885 L
Length
4658 - 4660 mm
Length
4792 mm
Width
1879 mm
Width
1853 - 1866 mm
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
Height
1666 - 1668 mm
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
Max trunk capacity
1915 - 2090 L
Payload
457 - 509 kg
Payload
489 - 566 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.1 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
Max Speed
204 - 240 km/h
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, G, B
Brand
Skoda
Brand
VW
Is the Skoda Enyaq offered with different drivetrains?

The Skoda Enyaq is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.