VS

Skoda Enyaq vs ZEEKR 7GT comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 646 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 41,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or ZEEKR 7GT?

Skoda Enyaq vs ZEEKR 7GT: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • moderately more efficient
  • marginally lighter
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

ZEEKR 7GT

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • somewhat more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Enyaq is somewhat cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the ZEEKR 7GT costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,286 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is moderately more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 16.6 kWh/100km for the ZEEKR 7GT. That’s a difference of about 1.7 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the ZEEKR 7GT offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 655 km, about 66 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.

7GT

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the ZEEKR 7GT offers significantly more power – delivering 646 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 306 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the ZEEKR 7GT is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.3 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the ZEEKR 7GT delivers barely more torque with 710 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 31 Nm more.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is marginally lighter – 2,074 kg compared to 2,265 kg. The difference is around 191 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers noticeably more boot space – 585 L compared to 456 L. That’s a difference of about 129 L.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The ZEEKR 7GT is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £41,100
7GT

ZEEKR 7GT

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 421 - 646 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.6 - 19.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 519 - 655 km
details

Frequently compared as well

ZEEKR 7X
ZEEKR 7GT
VS
Comparing the Zeekr 7X and Zeekr 7 GT helps you decide whether you want a more comfort- and practicality-focused electric model or a sportier, performance-oriented variant. The 7X leans toward everyday usability and refinement, while the 7 GT prioritizes sharper driving dynamics and a more …
XPeng G6
ZEEKR 7GT
VS
Putting the XPeng G6 and ZEEKR 7GT side-by-side highlights two sharply styled Chinese electric contenders that each promise strong range, advanced tech and engaging performance. I’ll compare driving feel, range, interior quality and ownership value so you can see which one better fits your …
Skoda Enyaq
ZEEKR 7GT

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
04_new_skoda_enyaq_68cf74d6-1920x1280
11_new_skoda_enyaq_c2b962a0-1920x1280
12_new_skoda_enyaq_de0afe4c-1920x1280
33_new_skoda_enyaq_833cbb5e-1920x1440
48_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_dad4ad75-1920x1280
49_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_37c35e34-1920x1280
50_new_skoda_enyaq_coupe_f55ae8bb-1920x1858

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
Delporte
16 May 2026, 16:33:37

More options and more room for discounts and negotiation, just as comfortable, better than a Hyundai Ioniq 5 (which is not comfortable at all), a Toyota bZ4X (feels cramped and has little space), a Tesla Model Y Premium (a bit too high-tech for me but otherwise fine), a Jaecoo 5 (entry-level, comfort impeccable but no options and little tech), and an Omoda (less comfortable and very few options). This is all a personal opinion — we drove the cars mentioned above and the Skoda seems the best value for money with good comfort, a variety of options and reliable after-sales service close to us.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

ZEEKR 7GT

The Zeekr 7 GT stakes its claim as a smartly styled, quietly confident grand tourer that mixes comfort with a sporty edge to keep daily drives interesting. Inside it feels more grown-up EV than gadget toy, offering a polished cabin and driver-focused flair that will appeal to buyers who want presence without pretension.

details
optisch-setzt-neue--431648
-preis-7gt-deutschland-kommt-steht-noch-fest-431653
zeekr-7gt-durchaus-reize-allem--431649

Reviews ZEEKR 7GT

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
Peter S
13 May 2026, 21:26:50

SUV — good off‑road, but makes no sense for urban driving, neither for efficiency nor for feel.
Hatchbacks give a modest boost in practicality over a traditional sedan while keeping a true sense of driving, rather than “riding” the car like you do in an SUV.
Granted, the SUV is a clear winner on those days when my back hurts and lowering myself into the driver’s seat is a problem.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
ZEEKR 001
ZEEKR 7GT
VS
Comparing the Zeekr 001 and the Zeekr 7 GT pits a compact, performance‑leaning electric fastback against a larger, GT‑oriented electric sedan focused on comfort and long‑distance refinement. If you want sharper handling and a sportier image, choose the 001; if you value rear‑seat space, ride …
Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
Comparing the Škoda Enyaq and the Kia EV5 pits two spacious, family-friendly electric SUVs against each other: the Enyaq focuses on practicality, value and a straightforward user experience, while the EV5 emphasizes cutting-edge cabin tech, distinctive styling and a more premium feel. This short …
Tesla Model 3
ZEEKR 7GT
VS
The Tesla Model 3 and Zeekr 7GT take very different approaches to modern EV ownership: the Model 3 is a compact, performance‑leaning sedan known for brisk acceleration, precise handling and Tesla’s ecosystem, while the Zeekr 7GT emphasizes a roomier, more comfort‑oriented experience with premium …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
Comparing the Skoda Enyaq and the Volkswagen ID.7 Touring pits a practical, roomy electric SUV against a sleek, long-distance electric estate. Both share VW Group underpinnings, but the Enyaq prioritizes interior space and value while the ID.7 Touring focuses on aerodynamic efficiency, range and …
Polestar 4
ZEEKR 7GT
VS
Polestar 4 and Zeekr 7 GT represent two different approaches to the modern premium EV coupe-SUV: Polestar brings Scandinavian restraint and driver-focused dynamics, while the Zeekr emphasizes tech-rich features and value-packed performance. This comparison cuts through specs and marketing to show …
XPeng P7+
ZEEKR 7GT
VS
Comparing the XPeng P7+ and the Zeekr 7 GT puts two sporty, tech‑heavy Chinese electric sedans head-to-head, each aiming to blend performance with premium features. I’ll break down range, driving dynamics, interior quality and tech so you can decide which one fits your priorities.
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Here’s a clear comparison between the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq to help determine which electric SUV suits your needs. I’ll focus on driving range, interior space, technology and overall value so you can pick the right balance of practicality and performance.
Skoda Enyaq
ZEEKR 7GT

Costs and Consumption
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Price
41,100 - 51,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 19.8 kWh/100km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Electric Range
519 - 655 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Curb weight
2,265 - 2,405 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
456 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,879 mm
Width
1,910 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
449 - 526 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
421 - 646 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.3 - 5.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
440 - 710 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
310 - 475 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
ZEEKR
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Enyaq have?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.