VS

Skoda Kamiq vs Kia Stonic comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 115 HP), boot space and price (22,300 £ vs 20,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kamiq or Kia Stonic?

Skoda Kamiq vs Kia Stonic: Key differences

Skoda Kamiq

4.9 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • barely more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately more trunk space
details

Kia Stonic

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Kamiq

Quick comparison: Kia Stonic VS Skoda Kamiq

Kia Stonic VS Skoda Kamiq frames a familiar trade-off: the Stonic is the city‑first, value‑focused small SUV while the Kamiq leans toward room, calm and everyday utility. The Stonic sells on compact agility, a very competitive price and a long factory guarantee that lowers ownership anxiety. The Kamiq answers with noticeably more rear space, a larger boot and a quieter, more assured highway demeanor. Buyers will quickly see this is not about one being strictly better but about whether you value nimble city manners and low entry cost (Stonic) or cabin space and long‑distance composure (Kamiq).

Stonic

Driving character and everyday usability

The Kia Stonic feels light on its feet: sharp initial turn‑in and a steering that makes urban weaving and tight parking effortless, which suits short trips and frequent stops. The Skoda Kamiq trades some of that immediacy for a steadier, less fidgety personality that masks speed changes and keeps highway cruising relaxed. In town the Stonic’s smaller footprint and eager responses mask its limited torque on highways, whereas the Kamiq’s stronger engine and calmer setup give it the reserve to overtake without fuss. Both are easy to live with day‑to‑day, but the Stonic rewards city commuters while the Kamiq better fits mixed routes with longer runs.

Kamiq

Comfort and long‑distance behavior

On long runs the differences become obvious: the Stonic’s suspension and higher noise levels make prolonged motorway stints more tiring, with road and wind noise intruding at pace. The Kamiq is quieter and rides with more composure, absorbing sustained speed and crosswinds in a way that reduces driver fatigue. Seats feel appropriately supportive in the Kamiq for hours on end; the Stonic’s seats are fine for shorter stints but the chassis transmits more sharp inputs. If you spend a lot of time on the motorway, the Kamiq’s long‑distance refinement will be more appreciated.

Stonic

Cabin feel, controls and perceived quality

The Stonic’s facelifted cockpit brings modern dual displays and a tidy layout but the touch is often economical — visible hard plastics remind you it’s a budget‑minded package. The Kamiq opts for practical, tactile controls with climate knobs and useful physical buttons that feel easier to use without looking away from the road. Both interiors are functional, but the Kamiq presents a more robust, utility‑first atmosphere while the Stonic leans on style updates and connectivity to mask simpler materials. Infotainment contrast is subtle: Stonic’s system is snappy and phone‑friendly often by cable, while the Kamiq can be reliable but occasionally sluggish depending on spec.

Kamiq

Practicality, space and everyday loading

Practical differences are decisive: the Kamiq gives noticeably more rear legroom and a larger, more usable boot that suits families and weekend luggage without constant Tetris packing. The Stonic’s boot and rear space are acceptable for two and occasional trips, but taller rear passengers and bulky loads quickly expose its limits. Both cars have trade‑offs around boot floor design and loading height, so think about how often you haul prams, bikes or awkward boxes. If you prioritise parking ease and tight‑city comfort, the Stonic wins on maneuverability; if daily cargo and passenger space matter more, the Kamiq is the smarter choice.

Stonic

Who should choose which car?

Choose the Kia Stonic if you want the cheapest entry to a modern small SUV, value a long warranty, and spend most time in town where agility and ease of parking dominate. Opt for the Skoda Kamiq if you need real rear‑seat room, a larger boot and a composed highway companion that saves stress and fuel on long commutes. The decision comes down to a clear buyer fit: Stonic for city‑centric, budget‑sensitive drivers; Kamiq for small families and mixed‑route commuters who prize space and refinement. Below this editorial comparison the technical section lays out the measurable differences — engine character, consumption and luggage numbers — so you can match those facts to the lifestyle trade‑offs described here.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kamiq

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Kia Stonic is marginally cheaper – starting at 20,400 £ , while the Skoda Kamiq costs 22,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,877 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kamiq uses 5.3 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Kia Stonic with 5.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

Stonic

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kamiq offers markedly more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 35 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kamiq is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the Kia Stonic takes 10.7 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kamiq delivers somewhat more torque with 250 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.

Kamiq

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Kia Stonic is barely lighter – 1,205 kg compared to 1,231 kg. The difference is around 26 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kamiq offers moderately more boot space – 400 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 48 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kamiq carries somewhat more – 539 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 94 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kamiq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,300
Kamiq

Skoda Kamiq

  • Engine Type Petrol
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 95 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
Skoda Kamiq
Kia Stonic

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Skoda Kamiq

The Skoda Kamiq is a practical, well-built small crossover that mixes city-friendly manners with surprisingly versatile interior space and clever storage solutions. It offers a comfortable ride, user-friendly technology and solid value, making it a sensible choice for everyday driving.

details

Kia Stonic

The Kia Stonic is a compact crossover that pairs nimble city manners with a surprisingly spacious and comfortable cabin. It’s a practical, well-equipped choice for buyers who value sensible features, approachable styling and easy everyday usability.

details
Skoda Kamiq
Kia Stonic

Costs and Consumption

Price
22,300 - 32,700 £
Price
20,400 - 26,800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
121 - 128 g/km
co2
126 - 128 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
Curb weight
1,205 - 1,270 kg
Trunk capacity
400 L
Trunk capacity
352 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,793 mm
Width
1,760 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
439 - 539 kg
Payload
440 - 445 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Power HP
100 - 115 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.7 - 12.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Torque
172 - 200 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Power kW
74 - 85 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
998 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Kia
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.