Compare performance (150 HP vs 306 HP), boot space and price (22,300 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kamiq or Mitsubishi Outlander?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Skoda Kamiq is considerably cheaper – starting at 22,300 £ , while the Mitsubishi Outlander costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,580 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Outlander uses 2.6 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 2.7 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Outlander offers considerably more power – delivering 306 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 156 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi Outlander is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.9 s, while the Skoda Kamiq takes 8.1 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is substantially lighter – 1,231 kg compared to 2,070 kg. The difference is around 839 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Mitsubishi Outlander carries marginally more – 595 kg compared to 539 kg. That’s a difference of about 56 kg.
The Mitsubishi Outlander is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Skoda Kamiq is a neatly packaged city crossover that pairs practical space with unshowy, thoughtful design. It’s easy to live with, economical to run and full of clever details that make daily driving feel intelligently sorted rather than flashy.
detailsThe Mitsubishi Outlander is a sensible family SUV that blends roomy practicality with a calm, assured ride—ideal for school runs and weekend getaways. It won’t set pulses racing, but its tidy interior, straightforward equipment and low-stress ownership make it a smart, unfussy pick for buyers who prefer reliability over flash.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22,300 - 32,700 £
|
Price
42,800 - 53,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 2.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
121 - 128 g/km
|
co2
60 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
|
Curb weight
2,070 - 2,120 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,241 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,793 mm
|
Width
1,862 mm
|
|
Height
1,562 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,395 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
439 - 539 kg
|
Payload
545 - 595 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
-
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
306 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
183 - 216 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
225 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,360 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|