VS

Skoda Kamiq vs Renault Captur comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (22,300 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kamiq or Renault Captur?

Skoda Kamiq vs Renault Captur: Key differences

Skoda Kamiq

5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
details

Renault Captur

4.8 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • marginally more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • barely more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Kamiq

Renault Captur vs Skoda Kamiq — which small SUV suits your everyday life?

The Renault Captur and Skoda Kamiq make very different promises in the same compact-SUV envelope, and the choice often comes down to priorities rather than specs. The Captur sells a tech-forward, quietly composed experience with hybrid options and a sliding rear bench that hints at clever packaging, whereas the Kamiq trades flash for everyday generosity: more rear room, familiar controls and straightforward practicality. If you want digital convenience and a calm hybrid ride the Captur leans in; if you value cabin space, visibility and simple ergonomics the Kamiq is more convincing. Below we compare character, comfort, usability, cabin feel and buyer fit so you can see which trade-offs matter in daily use.

Captur

Character and driving feel: relaxed tech versus pragmatic poise

The Renault Captur drives with a deliberate, comfort-first personality — especially in its hybrid guise where electric rolling and muted engine transitions create a serene feel. The Skoda Kamiq is noticeably more pragmatic: its steering is light and predictable, and the chassis rewards steady, confident inputs rather than sporty flicks. In traffic and on long runs the Captur feels composed and slightly insulated from the road, but it also masks feedback that enthusiastic drivers would miss; the Kamiq gives more direct sight and movement cues, which helps confidence though it leans into body roll on twisty roads. For buyers chasing calm, tech-assisted commuting the Captur’s character is attractive, while those who prefer readable, workmanlike responses will favour the Kamiq.

Kamiq

Comfort and long-distance behavior: quiet hybrid versus roomy touring

On long journeys the Captur’s quieter cabin and hybrid cruising make motorway miles less fatiguing, translating into a relaxed, almost premium-feeling rhythm at speed. The Kamiq compensates with an impressively spacious rear and stable straight-line manners that suit families and tall passengers on longer trips, even if the ride is a touch firmer over sharp longitudinal joints. Captur owners will appreciate the adjustable rear bench for balancing legroom and luggage, while Kamiq owners enjoy consistent rear-seat space that rarely demands compromise. In short, choose the Captur if noise isolation and hybrid efficiency top your list; pick the Kamiq if rear-seat comfort and predictable touring behavior are your priority.

Captur

City friendliness and everyday usability: agility versus visibility and tricks

Both cars are city-capable, but they approach urban life differently: the Captur feels nimble in tight streets and benefits from parking aids and frequent electric rolling in town, yet its rearward visibility can be restricted. The Kamiq’s large glass areas, slim pillars and intuitive controls make short trips and parking effortless, and a raft of clever storage solutions rewards everyday chores. Captur’s sliding bench gives a flexibility edge for mixed city hauling — you can trade trunk depth for passenger space quickly — whereas Kamiq’s straightforward layout means fewer surprises and easier day‑to‑day handling. If you live in cramped urban environments and value tech-assisted maneuvering choose the Captur, but for clear sightlines and fuss-free practicality the Kamiq gets the nod.

Kamiq

Cabin feel, infotainment and perceived quality: modern polish versus honest pragmatism

The Renault Captur presents a more contemporary cabin mood, with a large Google-based infotainment display and softer upper materials that lend a nicer first impression; the trade-off is fewer physical controls and fiddlier touch interactions for routine tasks. The Skoda Kamiq leans the opposite way: tactile knobs and a logical switch layout make instant adjustments easy, and the interior feels robust and utilitarian rather than indulgent. Infotainment responsiveness can be a weak spot for the Kamiq in some trims, while the Captur’s system is slicker but demands a little more attention when driving. Buyers who prize a modern digital feel and perceived refinement will prefer the Captur’s cabin, while those who value ergonomic certainty and durable practicality will favour the Kamiq.

Captur

Buyer fit and the big trade-offs before the technical details

Choosing between the Renault Captur and Skoda Kamiq is ultimately a question of temperament: the Captur suits tech-minded buyers and hybrid-oriented commuters who want a quiet, versatile small SUV with modern connectivity and flexible rear packaging. The Kamiq better serves buyers who prioritise rear passenger space, clear sightlines, simple ergonomics and the kind of dependable, low-drama usability that makes family life easier. Price and trim choices amplify these differences — Captur’s equipment and hybrid options appeal on value, while Kamiq often needs higher lines to match feature content but rewards with everyday practicality. Below you’ll find the technical comparison that quantifies these behavioral differences so you can match measured strengths to your personal priorities.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you prioritise everyday practicality and value or a bolder, slightly sportier compact SUV. Both share similar underpinnings, but the Kamiq excels in interior space and efficiency while the T‑Roc offers sharper styling and a …
Renault Captur
Renault Symbioz
VS
Captur and Symbioz showcase two very different Renault directions: Captur is a practical compact crossover focused on everyday comfort, economy and usability, while Symbioz is a forward‑looking concept exploring electric power, autonomous driving and living‑space ideas. This short comparison will …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kamiq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault Captur is barely cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Skoda Kamiq costs 22,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 883 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Captur uses 4.4 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.

Captur

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Captur offers marginally more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 8 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kamiq is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the Renault Captur takes 8.9 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Captur delivers barely more torque with 265 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 15 Nm more.

Kamiq

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is only slightly lighter – 1,231 kg compared to 1,323 kg. The difference is around 92 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Renault Captur offers barely more boot space – 422 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 22 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kamiq carries a bit more – 539 kg compared to 453 kg. That’s a difference of about 86 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Captur comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,400
Captur

Renault Captur

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 6 L/100km
details
Skoda Kamiq
Renault Captur

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Kamiq

The Skoda Kamiq is a practical, well-built small crossover that mixes city-friendly manners with surprisingly versatile interior space and clever storage solutions. It offers a comfortable ride, user-friendly technology and solid value, making it a sensible choice for everyday driving.

details
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114819
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114822
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ _114865
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ – Kofferraum_114870
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ Interieur_114688

Reviews Skoda Kamiq

5 (5 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Captur

The Renault Captur is a stylish and practical compact crossover that combines a high seating position and easy manoeuvrability with a comfortable, well‑equipped cabin. Its flexible interior layout and modern infotainment make it a sensible, polished choice for city drivers and small families.

details
r210470p
r210480p
r210476p
r210485p

Reviews Renault Captur

4.8 (7 Reviews)
rate
Lüsi
15 May 2026, 16:11:37

More affordable, high-level infotainment and better quality — good value for money.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Pet
4 Feb 2026, 11:01:12

The car was a very pleasant surprise. Very comfortable and enjoyable. The 1.3 TCe 158 hp engine is brilliant.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Waldemar
1 Feb 2026, 13:55:20

A 2025 mild‑hybrid, 160 hp.
Really nice little car. Mostly doing 200 km trips. Driving isn’t tiring. I trusted the driver‑assistance systems and… I wasn’t disappointed. The adaptive cruise control is brilliant, though I’d trust it about 90%. Overtaking punch is a plus. I recommend it with a clear conscience. Ah, just those 18" wheels 🤦. Obviously fuel consumption is higher because it’s an automatic.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
VW Taigo
VS
Deciding between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW Taigo? Both are compact crossovers aimed at urban buyers, but the Kamiq emphasizes practicality, interior space and value while the Taigo favors sporty styling and a slightly sharper driving feel—this comparison will help you choose which suits your needs.
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Captur
VS
The Nissan Qashqai stays the sensible family favourite — roomier, better built and more composed on the motorway, so it’s the pick if you value comfort and practicality without drama. The Renault Captur, meanwhile, charms with bolder styling, clever packaging and nippier city manners (usually for …
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Fabia and Skoda Kamiq comes down to whether you prefer a practical, efficient supermini or a taller, more versatile compact crossover. The Fabia excels for city driving and low running costs, while the Kamiq offers extra interior space, a higher driving position and …
Renault Captur
SEAT Arona
VS
The Renault Captur and SEAT Arona are two of Europe’s most popular compact crossovers, each offering a city-friendly footprint with raised driving position and SUV styling. This short comparison focuses on practicality, driving character, running costs and feature value to help you pick the one …
SEAT Arona
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Picking between the SEAT Arona and the Skoda Kamiq is largely a choice between a sportier, style-led crossover and a more practical, spacious, value-focused one. Both share similar underpinnings and efficient engines, but the Arona leans toward engaging looks and driving feel while the Kamiq …
Skoda Kamiq
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Small crossover showdown: the Skoda Kamiq and Toyota Yaris Cross both promise compact-SUV practicality, but they take very different routes — the Kamiq leans on clever space, solid build and punchy petrols, while the Yaris Cross trades on hybrid frugality and nimble city manners. We’ll compare …
Dacia Sandero
Renault Captur
VS
Choosing between the Dacia Sandero and the Renault Captur comes down to whether you prioritise affordable, no-nonsense practicality or a more refined, crossover-style package with extra equipment. The Sandero delivers exceptional value and low running costs, while the Captur offers more comfort, …
Citroen C3
Renault Captur
VS
Choosing between the Citroën C3 and the Renault Captur comes down to whether you want a compact, comfort-focused hatch with quirky styling or a slightly larger, more versatile crossover with a higher driving position. I’ll compare practicality, fuel economy, driving feel and value so you can pick …
Skoda Kamiq
Renault Captur

Costs and Consumption
Price
22,300 - 32,700 £
Price
21,400 - 28,400 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
121 - 128 g/km
co2
100 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
Curb weight
1,323 - 1,441 kg
Trunk capacity
400 L
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,793 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
439 - 539 kg
Payload
447 - 453 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Kamiq have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.